IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v11y2018i1d10.1007_s40271-017-0267-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire in Patients with Stroke: A Latent Trait Analysis Using Rasch Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Yi-Jing Huang

    (National Taiwan University)

  • Cheng-Te Chen

    (National Tsing Hua University)

  • Gong-Hong Lin

    (National Taiwan University)

  • Tzu-Yi Wu

    (Academia Sinica)

  • Sheng-Shiung Chen

    (E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University)

  • Li-Fong Lin

    (Taipei Medical University
    Taipei Medical University)

  • Wen-Hsuan Hou

    (Taipei Medical University
    Taipei Medical University
    Taipei Medical University Hospital)

  • Ching-Lin Hsieh

    (National Taiwan University
    National Taiwan University Hospital)

Abstract

Background The effective self-management and treatment of long-term disability after stroke depends greatly on the health literacy of patients. The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q) is a comprehensive and theory-based measure that captures multiple self-perceived competencies of health literacy and covers a diverse range of health contexts. However, there is no psychometric evidence on the HLS-EU-Q in the stroke population. Objective The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the HLS-EU-Q in patients with stroke using Rasch analysis. Methods We compared the model deviance among the one-domain, three-domain, four-domain, and 12-domain structures using likelihood ratio tests to determine the dimensionality of the HLS-EU-Q. Thereafter, we examined the unidimensionality of each domain, local independence, item fit, response categories, and differential item functioning (DIF) for the best fitting structure. Results A total of 311 patients with stroke participated in this study. Rasch analysis revealed that the 12-domain HLS-EU-Q demonstrated the best data–model fit. The original 4-point scales showed disordering, which can be corrected by rescaling them as 3-point scales with the two middle categories collapsed. All 47 items in the rescaled HLS-EU-Q fit the 12-domain Rasch model, demonstrated local independence, assessed the 12 unidimensional domains respectively, and had invariant difficulties between different age or education groups of the patients with stroke. Conclusion We recommend using the 12-domain scores of the rescaled HLS-EU-Q to comprehensively and accurately capture the competencies to access, understand, appraise, and apply health information within the three health contexts of healthcare, disease prevention, and health promotion for patients with stroke.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi-Jing Huang & Cheng-Te Chen & Gong-Hong Lin & Tzu-Yi Wu & Sheng-Shiung Chen & Li-Fong Lin & Wen-Hsuan Hou & Ching-Lin Hsieh, 2018. "Evaluating the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire in Patients with Stroke: A Latent Trait Analysis Using Rasch Modeling," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 11(1), pages 83-96, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0267-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0267-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-017-0267-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-017-0267-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David W. Baker & Julie A. Gazmararian & Joseph Sudano & Marian Patterson, 2000. "The Association Between Age and Health Literacy Among Elderly Persons," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 55(6), pages 368-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lopez, Claude & Kim, Bumyang & Sacks, Katherine, 2022. "Health Literacy in the United States: Enhancing Assessments and Reducing Disparities," MPRA Paper 114019, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Liesbeth de Wit & Pania Karnaki & Archontoula Dalma & Peter Csizmadia & Charlotte Salter & Andrea de Winter & Louise Meijering, 2020. "Health Literacy in the Everyday Lives of Older Adults in Greece, Hungary, and the Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Aleksandra Jovic-Vranes & Vesna Bjegovic-Mikanovic & Jelena Marinkovic & Nikola Kocev, 2011. "Health literacy in a population of primary health-care patients in Belgrade, Serbia," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(2), pages 201-207, April.
    4. Jingyi Wang & Jing Guan & Guojun Wang, 2023. "Impact of long‐term care insurance on the health status of middle‐aged and older adults," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 558-573, March.
    5. Yunna Kwan & Sungwon Choi & Tae Rim Eom & Tae Hui Kim, 2021. "Development of a Structured Interview to Explore Interpersonal Schema of Older Adults Living Alone Based on Autobiographical Memory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Elisabeth Rohwer & Natascha Mojtahedzadeh & Felix Alexander Neumann & Albert Nienhaus & Matthias Augustin & Volker Harth & Birgit-Christiane Zyriax & Stefanie Mache, 2021. "The Role of Health Literacy among Outpatient Caregivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Pilar Bas-Sarmiento & Miriam Poza-Méndez & Martina Fernández-Gutiérrez & Juan Luis González-Caballero & María Falcón Romero, 2020. "Psychometric Assessment of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16) for Arabic/French-Speaking Migrants in Southern Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Barbara K Kondilis & Ismene J Kiriaze & Anastasia P Athanasoulia & Matthew E Falagas, 2008. "Mapping Health Literacy Research in the European Union: A Bibliometric Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-6, June.
    9. Du, Xuyang & Mohd, Saidatulakmal, 2024. "Urban–Rural heterogeneity in the effect of population ageing on the savings rate of urban and rural households in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 999-1010.
    10. Yoko Aihara & Kiyoshi Maeda, 2020. "Dementia Literacy and Willingness to Dementia Screening," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-11, November.
    11. Nida Buawangpong & Wachiranun Sirikul & Chanya Anukhro & Mathuramat Seesen & Aroon La-up & Penprapa Siviroj, 2022. "Health Information Sources Influencing Health Literacy in Different Social Contexts across Age Groups in Northern Thailand Citizens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Yoon-Sook Kim & Hyun Ah Kim & Moon-Sook Kim & Hyuo Sun Kim & Mi Jeong Kwak & Jahae Chun & Jee-In Hwang & Hyeran Kim, 2020. "How to Improve Patient Safety Literacy?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-12, October.
    13. Patrizio Zanobini & Chiara Lorini & Vieri Lastrucci & Valentina Minardi & Valentina Possenti & Maria Masocco & Giorgio Garofalo & Giovanna Mereu & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi, 2021. "Health Literacy, Socio-Economic Determinants, and Healthy Behaviours: Results from a Large Representative Sample of Tuscany Region, Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-11, November.
    14. Han-Gyul Lee & Seungwon Kwon & Bo-Hyoung Jang & Jin Pyeong Jeon & Ye-Seul Lee & Woo-Sang Jung & Sang-Kwan Moon & Ki-Ho Cho, 2022. "A Study on the Perceptions of Korean Older Adult Patients and Caregivers about Polypharmacy and Deprescribing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:11:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s40271-017-0267-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.