IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/patien/v10y2017i3d10.1007_s40271-016-0213-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Benefits and Factors that Influence the Ability to Establish and Maintain Patient Support Groups in Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa C. Delisle

    (McGill University
    Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital)

  • Stephanie T. Gumuchian

    (McGill University
    Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital)

  • Danielle B. Rice

    (McGill University
    Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital)

  • Alexander W. Levis

    (McGill University
    Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital)

  • Lorie A. Kloda

    (Concordia University)

  • Annett Körner

    (McGill University
    Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital)

  • Brett D. Thombs

    (McGill University
    Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital)

Abstract

Background Support groups are an important resource for many people living with rare diseases. The perceived benefits of participating in support groups for people with rare diseases and factors that may influence the ability to successfully establish and maintain these groups are not well understood. Thus, the objective of this scoping review was to provide a mapping of the available evidence on the (1) benefits or perceived benefits of participating in rare disease support groups and (2) barriers and facilitators of establishing and maintaining these groups. Methods CINAHL and PubMed were searched from January 2000 to August 2015, with no language restrictions. Publications that described the benefits or perceived benefits of participating in rare disease support groups or the barriers and facilitators of establishing and maintaining them were eligible for inclusion. Two investigators independently evaluated titles/abstracts and full-text publications for eligibility, and extracted data from each included publication. Results Ten publications were included in the scoping review. There was no trial evidence on support group benefits. All ten publications reported on the perceived benefits of participating in rare disease support groups. Three reported on barriers and facilitators of establishing and maintaining them. Overall, seven different perceived benefits of participating in rare disease support groups were identified: (1) meeting and befriending other people with the same rare disease and similar experiences; (2) learning about the disease and related treatments; (3) giving and receiving emotional support; (4) having a place to speak openly about the disease and one’s feelings; (5) learning coping skills; (6) feeling empowered and hopeful; and (7) advocating to improve healthcare for other rare disease patients. Several facilitators (e.g., meeting via teleconference) and barriers (e.g., getting patients and/or family members to lead the group) of establishing and maintaining these groups were identified. Conclusions Rare disease support groups are an important source of emotional and practical support for many patients. There is no trial evidence on the benefits of these groups and limited evidence on the perceived benefits and barriers and facilitators to establishing and maintaining them.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa C. Delisle & Stephanie T. Gumuchian & Danielle B. Rice & Alexander W. Levis & Lorie A. Kloda & Annett Körner & Brett D. Thombs, 2017. "Perceived Benefits and Factors that Influence the Ability to Establish and Maintain Patient Support Groups in Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(3), pages 283-293, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-016-0213-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0213-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-016-0213-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40271-016-0213-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ussher, Jane & Kirsten, Laura & Butow, Phyllis & Sandoval, Mirjana, 2006. "What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2565-2576, May.
    2. Sharon Lohr & Peter Z. Schochet & Elizabeth Sanders, "undated". "Partially Nested Randomized Controlled Trials in Education Research: A Guide to Design and Analysis," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7dce2a40502a473eb80425d5e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Inhestern & Maja Brandt & Joenna Driemeyer & Jonas Denecke & Jessika Johannsen & Corinna Bergelt, 2023. "Experiences of Health Care and Psychosocial Needs in Parents of Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-10, March.
    2. Eitan Mijiritsky & Michal Dekel-Steinkeller & Oren Peleg & Shlomi Kleinman & Clariel Ianculovici & Amir Shuster & Shimrit Arbel & Menachem Ben-Ezra & Maayan Shacham, 2021. "Knowledge and Associated Factors about Rare Diseases among Dentists in Israel: A Cross Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annette Felgenhauer & Katharina Kaufmann & Julia Klier & Mathias Klier, 2021. "In the same boat: social support in online peer groups for career counseling," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 197-213, March.
    2. Britt Borregaard & Mette Spliid Ludvigsen, 2018. "Exchanging narratives—A qualitative study of peer support among surgical lung cancer patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 328-336, January.
    3. Sue Kim & Jeehee Han & Min Young Lee & Min Kyeong Jang, 2020. "The experience of cancer‐related fatigue, exercise and exercise adherence among women breast cancer survivors: Insights from focus group interviews," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 758-769, March.
    4. Martin Bøg & Jens Dietrichson & Anna A. Isaksson, 2021. "A multi-sensory tutoring program for students at risk of reading difficulties: Evidence from a randomized field experiment," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(3), pages 233-251, April.
    5. Barak-Nahum, Ayelet & Haim, Limor Ben & Ginzburg, Karni, 2016. "When life gives you lemons: The effectiveness of culinary group intervention among cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-8.
    6. May Aasebø Hauken & Kari Dyregrov & Mette Senneseth, 2019. "Characteristics of the social networks of families living with parental cancer and support provided," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 3021-3032, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:patien:v:10:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s40271-016-0213-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.