IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i15-16p3021-3032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of the social networks of families living with parental cancer and support provided

Author

Listed:
  • May Aasebø Hauken
  • Kari Dyregrov
  • Mette Senneseth

Abstract

Objective To examine the characteristics of the social networks of families living with parental cancer and the kind of social support they provide compared with what the families report having received. Background Parental cancers are highly distressing for both parents and children. Among other concerns, families report a severe lack of social support. However, we know little about these families’ private social networks, nor support provided and received as reported by network members and the family. Methods Using a descriptive cross‐sectional design, 16 families living with parental cancer and 130 of their network members participated. Healthy parents and network members filled out The Assistance Questionnaire‐Receivers of support (AQR)/The Assistance Questionnaire‐Providers of Support (AQP). Results Network members were mainly resourceful friends (44%) and family members (42%). Only 1/3 became supporters at diagnosis, and nearly 50% had to be asked. Supporters provided a variety of types of help, especially emotional support. A match between the perception of the healthy parent and that of the network members was found for provided (p = 0.211) and received (p = 0.741) support. Supporters were satisfied with their provided support, experiencing it as rewarding and associated with few negative aspects. The STROBE checklist for observational studies was followed in reporting the results. Conclusions The social networks, being mainly family and friends, were able to provide different types of help, especially emotional support. A useful suggestion may be to involve supporters at an earlier stage, providing more practical support. Relevance for clinical practice Nurses are in a unique position to promote social support for families living with parental cancer by embracing a network focus, by emphasising the importance and potential of social support, by helping families to map their network and by teaching them how to be explicit in their requests for support.

Suggested Citation

  • May Aasebø Hauken & Kari Dyregrov & Mette Senneseth, 2019. "Characteristics of the social networks of families living with parental cancer and support provided," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 3021-3032, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:3021-3032
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14859
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ussher, Jane & Kirsten, Laura & Butow, Phyllis & Sandoval, Mirjana, 2006. "What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(10), pages 2565-2576, May.
    2. Seyedezahra Shadi Erfani & Babak Abedin & Yvette Blount, 2017. "The effect of social network site use on the psychological well-being of cancer patients," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(5), pages 1308-1322, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devendra Potnis & Macy Halladay, 2022. "Information practices of administrators for controlling information in an online community of new mothers in rural America," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(11), pages 1621-1640, November.
    2. Sue Kim & Jeehee Han & Min Young Lee & Min Kyeong Jang, 2020. "The experience of cancer‐related fatigue, exercise and exercise adherence among women breast cancer survivors: Insights from focus group interviews," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 758-769, March.
    3. Barak-Nahum, Ayelet & Haim, Limor Ben & Ginzburg, Karni, 2016. "When life gives you lemons: The effectiveness of culinary group intervention among cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Babak Abedin & Abdul Babar, 2018. "Institutional vs. Non-institutional use of Social Media during Emergency Response: A Case of Twitter in 2014 Australian Bush Fire," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 729-740, August.
    5. Annette Felgenhauer & Katharina Kaufmann & Julia Klier & Mathias Klier, 2021. "In the same boat: social support in online peer groups for career counseling," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 197-213, March.
    6. Britt Borregaard & Mette Spliid Ludvigsen, 2018. "Exchanging narratives—A qualitative study of peer support among surgical lung cancer patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 328-336, January.
    7. Vanessa C. Delisle & Stephanie T. Gumuchian & Danielle B. Rice & Alexander W. Levis & Lorie A. Kloda & Annett Körner & Brett D. Thombs, 2017. "Perceived Benefits and Factors that Influence the Ability to Establish and Maintain Patient Support Groups in Rare Diseases: A Scoping Review," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 10(3), pages 283-293, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:3021-3032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.