IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/orspec/v38y2016i2d10.1007_s00291-016-0436-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A rough-cut capacity planning model with overlapping

Author

Listed:
  • Georges Baydoun

    (École Polytechnique)

  • Alain Haït

    (University of Toulouse)

  • Robert Pellerin

    (École Polytechnique)

  • Bernard Clément

    (École Polytechnique)

  • Guillaume Bouvignies

    (University of Toulouse)

Abstract

In the early phases of projects, capacity planning is performed to assess the feasibility of the project in terms of delivery date, resource usage and cost. This tactical approach relies on an aggregated representation of tasks in work packages. At this level, aggressive project duration objectives are achieved by adopting work package overlapping policies that affect both workload and resource usage. In this article, we propose a mixed-time MILP model for project capacity planning with different possibilities for overlapping levels between work packages. In the model, the planning time horizon is divided into time buckets used to evaluate resource usage, while starting and ending times for work packages are continuous. The model was tested on a benchmark of 5 sets of 450 theoretical instances each. More than half of the tested instances were solved to optimality within 500 s. Results also show that, while overlapping is more beneficial for accelerating project delivery times, it can still have a positive impact on project cost by allowing a better distribution of workload. Finally, overlapping options seem to have less influence on the performance of the model than project slack or number of work packages.

Suggested Citation

  • Georges Baydoun & Alain Haït & Robert Pellerin & Bernard Clément & Guillaume Bouvignies, 2016. "A rough-cut capacity planning model with overlapping," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(2), pages 335-364, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:38:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00291-016-0436-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00291-016-0436-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00291-016-0436-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00291-016-0436-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer Kolisch & Arno Sprecher & Andreas Drexl, 1995. "Characterization and Generation of a General Class of Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(10), pages 1693-1703, October.
    2. Tamás Kis, 2006. "RCPS with Variable Intensity Activities and Feeding Precedence Constraints," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Joanna Józefowska & Jan Weglarz (ed.), Perspectives in Modern Project Scheduling, chapter 0, pages 105-129, Springer.
    3. Naber, Anulark & Kolisch, Rainer, 2014. "MIP models for resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 335-348.
    4. François Berthaut & Robert Pellerin & Nathalie Perrier & Adnène Hajji, 2014. "Time-cost trade-offs in resource-constraint project scheduling problems with overlapping modes," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3), pages 215-236.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2022. "An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 1-14.
    2. Neumann, Anas & Hajji, Adnene & Rekik, Monia & Pellerin, Robert, 2022. "A model for advanced planning systems dedicated to the Engineer-To-Order context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    3. Rainer Kolisch & Erik Demeulemeester & Rubén Ruiz Garcia & Vincent T’Kindt & Jan Węglarz, 2016. "Editorial “Project Management and Scheduling”," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(2), pages 279-281, March.
    4. Neumann, Anas & Hajji, Adnene & Rekik, Monia & Pellerin, Robert, 2024. "Integrated planning and scheduling of engineer-to-order projects using a Lamarckian Layered Genetic Algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mick Van Den Eeckhout & Broos Maenhout & Mario Vanhoucke, 2020. "Mode generation rules to define activity flexibility for the integrated project staffing problem with discrete time/resource trade-offs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(1), pages 133-160, September.
    2. Tritschler, Martin & Naber, Anulark & Kolisch, Rainer, 2017. "A hybrid metaheuristic for resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(1), pages 262-273.
    3. Kellenbrink, Carolin & Helber, Stefan, 2015. "Scheduling resource-constrained projects with a flexible project structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 379-391.
    4. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    5. Wendi Tian & Erik Demeulemeester, 2014. "Railway scheduling reduces the expected project makespan over roadrunner scheduling in a multi-mode project scheduling environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 271-291, February.
    6. M. Vanhoucke & J. Coelho & L. V. Tavares & D. Debels, 2004. "On The Morphological Structure Of A Network," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/272, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    7. Rainer Kolisch & Andreas Drexl, 1996. "Adaptive search for solving hard project scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 23-40, February.
    8. Jan Böttcher & Andreas Drexl & Rainer Kolisch & Frank Salewski, 1999. "Project Scheduling Under Partially Renewable Resource Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 543-559, April.
    9. Sprecher, Arno & Drexl, Andreas, 1996. "Minimal delaying alternatives and semi-active timetabling in resource-constrained project scheduling," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 426, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    10. Brech, Claus-Henning & Ernst, Andreas & Kolisch, Rainer, 2019. "Scheduling medical residents’ training at university hospitals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 253-266.
    11. Schirmer, Andreas & Potzhar, Kathrin, 2001. "Professional course scheduling in airline transport pilot training: A case from Lufthansa flight training," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 539, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    12. Nima Zoraghi & Aria Shahsavar & Babak Abbasi & Vincent Peteghem, 2017. "Multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with material ordering under bonus–penalty policies," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(1), pages 49-79, April.
    13. Yamashita, Denise Sato & Armentano, Vinicius Amaral & Laguna, Manuel, 2006. "Scatter search for project scheduling with resource availability cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(2), pages 623-637, March.
    14. Schirmer, Andreas & Riesenberg, Sven, 1997. "Parameterized heuristics for project scheduling: Biased random sampling methods," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 456, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    15. Aristide Mingozzi & Vittorio Maniezzo & Salvatore Ricciardelli & Lucio Bianco, 1998. "An Exact Algorithm for the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem Based on a New Mathematical Formulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(5), pages 714-729, May.
    16. Ripon K. Chakrabortty & Ruhul A. Sarker & Daryl L. Essam, 2020. "Single mode resource constrained project scheduling with unreliable resources," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1369-1403, September.
    17. Gréanne Leeftink & Erwin W. Hans, 2018. "Case mix classification and a benchmark set for surgery scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 17-33, February.
    18. Drexl, Andreas & Nissen, Rudiger & Patterson, James H. & Salewski, Frank, 2000. "ProGen/[pi]x - An instance generator for resource-constrained project scheduling problems with partially renewable resources and further extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 59-72, August.
    19. Sönke Hartmann, 1998. "A competitive genetic algorithm for resource‐constrained project scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(7), pages 733-750, October.
    20. Cédric Verbeeck & Vincent Peteghem & Mario Vanhoucke & Pieter Vansteenwegen & El-Houssaine Aghezzaf, 2017. "A metaheuristic solution approach for the time-constrained project scheduling problem," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 39(2), pages 353-371, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:orspec:v:38:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s00291-016-0436-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.