IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v60y2023i1d10.1007_s12597-022-00605-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decision support tool for oil spill response strategy selection: application of LBWA and Z MABAC methods

Author

Listed:
  • Darko Božanić

    (University of Defense in Belgrade)

  • Dragan Pamucar

    (University of Belgrade)

  • Ibrahim Badi

    (Libyan Academy)

  • Duško Tešić

    (University of Defense in Belgrade)

Abstract

The high global demand for oil and its derivatives has increased the risk of oil spills associated with the extraction, processing, and transportation of this product. Oil spill emergency management considers that decision-making is a very complex and multi-criteria problem that must be taken into account, given that the effects of these spills include several aspects, the most important of which are the environmental and economic impacts. Oil spill response management decisions are aimed at minimizing these impacts. To solve such a complex problem, this paper is devoted to propose a new multi-criteria model using LBWA-Z MABAC methods. In the first step, the model uses the LBWA method to calculate the criteria weights coefficients. In the second step, the modified MABAC method with Z-numbers was used to select the best contingency strategy to deal with oil spill risks. The calculations were performed on the El Sharara field, which is the second largest oil producing field in Libya. In the case study, six criteria and nine strategies were used, which were selected by a group of experts. The results showed that the type and volume of the oil spill is the most important criterion for selecting the appropriate strategy, and that the best strategy for managing the oil spill in the case study is drain blocking. In order to check the model, a sensitivity analysis was performed by analyzing the effect of changes in the values of the weighting coefficients on the ranking results, as well as by studying the effect of changing the p, q factors. The results obtained were also compared with the fuzzy method and the Z numbers.

Suggested Citation

  • Darko Božanić & Dragan Pamucar & Ibrahim Badi & Duško Tešić, 2023. "A decision support tool for oil spill response strategy selection: application of LBWA and Z MABAC methods," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(1), pages 24-58, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:60:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-022-00605-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-022-00605-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-022-00605-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-022-00605-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ljubomir Gigović & Dragan Pamučar & Zoran Bajić & Milić Milićević, 2016. "The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Thomas L. Saaty & Daji Ergu, 2015. "When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1171-1187, November.
    3. Wenshuai Wu, 2021. "A Revised Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multicriteria Group Decision-Making with Expected Utility Theory for Oil Spill Emergency Management," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-13, March.
    4. Anjali Singh & Anjana Gupta & Aparna Mehra, 2021. "Best criteria selection based PROMETHEE II method," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(1), pages 160-180, March.
    5. Anjana Kuiri & Barun Das, 2020. "An application of FISM and TOPSIS to a multi-objective multi-item solid transportation problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(4), pages 1299-1318, December.
    6. Stewart, Theodor J. & French, Simon & Rios, Jesus, 2013. "Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning—Review and extension," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 679-688.
    7. M. A. El Sayed & Ibrahim A. Baky & Pitam Singh, 2020. "A modified TOPSIS approach for solving stochastic fuzzy multi-level multi-objective fractional decision making problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(4), pages 1374-1403, December.
    8. Wenshuai Wu & Yi Peng, 2016. "Extension of grey relational analysis for facilitating group consensus to oil spill emergency management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 615-635, March.
    9. Iakovou, Eleftherios & Ip, Chi M. & Douligeris, Christos & Korde, Ashutosh, 1997. "Optimal location and capacity of emergency cleanup equipment for oil spill response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 72-80, January.
    10. Stanley Zionts & Jyrki Wallenius, 1983. "An Interactive Multiple Objective Linear Programming Method for a Class of Underlying Nonlinear Utility Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 519-529, May.
    11. Junhua Hu & Panpan Chen & Yan Yang, 2019. "An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Similarity-Based MABAC Approach for Patient-Centered Care," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Wenshuai Wu & Yi Peng, 2016. "Extension of grey relational analysis for facilitating group consensus to oil spill emergency management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 615-635, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    2. Hua Shi & Mei-Yun Quan & Hu-Chen Liu & Chun-Yan Duan, 2018. "A Novel Integrated Approach for Green Supplier Selection with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Uncertain Linguistic Information: A Case Study in the Agri-Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Xiao-Wen Qi & Jun-Ling Zhang & Shu-Ping Zhao & Chang-Yong Liang, 2017. "Tackling Complex Emergency Response Solutions Evaluation Problems in Sustainable Development by Fuzzy Group Decision Making Approaches with Considering Decision Hesitancy and Prioritization among Asse," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-35, October.
    4. Sukanta Malakar & Abhishek K. Rai, 2022. "Earthquake vulnerability in the Himalaya by integrated multi-criteria decision models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(1), pages 213-237, March.
    5. Xuedong Liang & Meng Ye & Li Yang & Wanbing Fu & Zhi Li, 2018. "Evaluation and Policy Research on the Sustainable Development of China’s Rare Earth Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Valentinas Podvezko & Ieva Ubarte & Arturas Kaklauskas, 2017. "MCDM Assessment of a Healthy and Safe Built Environment According to Sustainable Development Principles: A Practical Neighborhood Approach in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    9. Al-Ebbini, Lina & Oztekin, Asil & Chen, Yao, 2016. "FLAS: Fuzzy lung allocation system for US-based transplantations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 1051-1065.
    10. Böyükaslan, Adem & Ecer, Fatih, 2021. "Determination of drivers for investing in cryptocurrencies through a fuzzy full consistency method-Bonferroni (FUCOM-F’B) framework," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Wang, Shaojun & Sarker, Bhaba R. & Mann, Lawrence & Triantaphyllou, Evangelos, 2004. "Resource planning and a depot location model for electric power restoration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 22-43, May.
    12. Frankie KK Wong & Tung Fung, 2016. "Ecotourism planning in Lantau Island using multiple criteria decision analysis with geographic information system," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(4), pages 640-662, July.
    13. Scholz, Roland W. & Czichos, Reiner & Parycek, Peter & Lampoltshammer, Thomas J., 2020. "Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 627-643.
    14. Saeid Alaei & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Unveiling the role of sustainable supply chain drivers toward knowledge-based economy via a novel permutation approach: implications from an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1231-1250, September.
    15. Piotr Wojewnik & Tomasz Szapiro, 2010. "Bireference Procedure fBIP for Interactive Multicriteria Optimization with Fuzzy Coefficients," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 2(3), pages 169-193, June.
    16. Corrado Zoppi, 2014. "Does Landscape Protection Really Matter? An Assessment Based on Multicriteria Analysis," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1 Suppl.), pages 47-69.
    17. Poli, Giuliano & Cuntò, Stefano & Muccio, Eugenio & Cerreta, Maria, 2024. "A spatial decision support system for multi-dimensional sustainability assessment of river basin districts: the case study of Sarno river, Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    18. Francesco Ciardiello & Andrea Genovese, 2023. "A comparison between TOPSIS and SAW methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 967-994, June.
    19. Haddad, M. & Sanders, D. & Tewkesbury, G., 2020. "Selecting a discrete multiple criteria decision making method for Boeing to rank four global market regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-15.
    20. Adrian Castro-Lopez & Javier Puente & Rodolfo Vazquez-Casielles, 2018. "e-Service Quality Model for Spanish Textile and Fashion Sector: Positioning Analysis and B2C Ranking by F-Topsis," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(02), pages 485-512, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:60:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12597-022-00605-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.