IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v56y2019i3d10.1007_s12597-019-00377-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of trust in the strategic decisions of a decentralized supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel-Josué Heredia-Roldán

    (Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla)

  • Damián-Emilio Gibaja-Romero

    (Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla)

  • José-Luis Martínez-Flores

    (Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla)

  • Santiago-Omar Caballero-Morales

    (Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla)

Abstract

The establishment of contracts pursues the efficient fulfillment of supply chain members’ needs. However, this is not always possible due to market features and, more interestingly, the additional constraints that such mechanisms impose. Trust relationships, that we define as the absence of contracts, appear as a mean to deal with situations where contracts block decision making. Although trust enhances production/management activities, it is not clear how the absence of contracts impact on delivery times, which we investigate in this paper. We analyze a decentralized supply chain where a manufacturer needs an intermediate input, but typical suppliers that have a contract with the manufacturer do not provide it; so, he establishes a non-contractual relationship with an “external” provider. We model this interaction as a two-stage game and show necessary and sufficient condition to guarantee the existence and uniqueness of the Sub-game perfect Nash equilibria. Also, we show the relationship between delivery times and input’s requisition, at equilibrium, with exogenous variables like production costs and base revenue. We find that intuitive relationships hold when the requisition cost is higher than a third of the manufacturer’s revenue.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel-Josué Heredia-Roldán & Damián-Emilio Gibaja-Romero & José-Luis Martínez-Flores & Santiago-Omar Caballero-Morales, 2019. "The impact of trust in the strategic decisions of a decentralized supply chain," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(3), pages 757-779, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:56:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00377-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-019-00377-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-019-00377-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-019-00377-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Paul MacDuffie, 2011. "Inter-organizational trust and the dynamics of distrust," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(1), pages 35-47, January.
    2. Andreas Brinkhoff & Özalp Özer & Gökçe Sargut, 2015. "All You Need Is Trust? An Examination of Inter-organizational Supply Chain Projects," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(2), pages 181-200, February.
    3. Schipmann, Christin & Qaim, Matin, 2011. "Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers' marketing preferences: The case of sweet pepper in Thailand," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 666-676, October.
    4. Hou, Yunzhang & Wang, Xiaoling & Wu, Yenchun Jim & He, Peixu, 2018. "How does the trust affect the topology of supply chain network and its resilience? An agent-based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 229-241.
    5. Detken, Carsten & Smets, Frank, 2004. "Asset price booms and monetary policy," Working Paper Series 364, European Central Bank.
    6. Joyee Deb & Jin Li & Arijit Mukherjee, 2016. "Relational contracts with subjective peer evaluations," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 47(1), pages 3-28, February.
    7. Peter M. Ralston & Jennifer Blackhurst & David E. Cantor & Michael R. Crum, 2015. "A Structure–Conduct–Performance Perspective of How Strategic Supply Chain Integration Affects Firm Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 51(2), pages 47-64, April.
    8. Jeff Dyer & Wujin Chu, 2011. "The determinants of trust in supplier–automaker relations in the US, Japan, and Korea: A retrospective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(1), pages 28-34, January.
    9. Jeffrey H Dyer & Wujin Chu, 2011. "The determinants of trust in supplier–automaker relationships in the US, Japan, and Korea," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 42(1), pages 10-27, January.
    10. Phillip J. Lederer & Lode Li, 1997. "Pricing, Production, Scheduling, and Delivery-Time Competition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 407-420, June.
    11. Lu, Qing & Meng, Fanwen & Goh, Mark, 2014. "Choice of supply chain governance: Self-managing or outsourcing?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 32-38.
    12. Tiaojun Xiao & Xiangtong Qi, 2016. "A two-stage supply chain with demand sensitive to price, delivery time, and reliability of delivery," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 241(1), pages 475-496, June.
    13. Schipmann, Christin & Qaim, Matin, 2011. "Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers’ marketing preferences: the case of sweet pepper in Thailand," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 108349, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    14. Hossain, Md Shahriar J. & Ohaiba, Mohamed M. & Sarker, Bhaba R., 2017. "An optimal vendor-buyer cooperative policy under generalized lead-time distribution with penalty cost for delivery lateness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 50-62.
    15. Schipmann, Christin & Qaim, Matin, 2011. "Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers’ marketing preferences: The case of sweet pepper in Thailand," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 667-677.
    16. Jeffrey H Dyer & Wujin Chu, 2000. "The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-Automaker Relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 31(2), pages 259-285, June.
    17. Martino, Gaetano & Fritz, Melanie, 2010. "Expectations, Experiences, Trust in the Case of Short Circuit Food Supply Networks," 2010 International European Forum, February 8-12, 2010, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 100592, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carole Couper & A. Rebecca Reuber & Shameen Prashantham, 2020. "Lost that lovin’ feeling: The erosion of trust between small, high-distance partners," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(3), pages 326-352, April.
    2. Chen, Yi-Su & Su, Hung-Chung & Ro, Young K., 2017. "The co-evolution of supplier relationship quality and product quality in the U.S. auto industry: A cultural perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 245-255.
    3. Sebastian Kunte & Meike Wollni & Claudia Keser, 2017. "Making it personal: breach and private ordering in a contract farming experiment," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(1), pages 121-148.
    4. Adu-Gyamfi Poku & Regina Birner & Saurabh Gupta, 2018. "Making Contract Farming Arrangements Work in Africa’s Bioeconomy: Evidence from Cassava Outgrower Schemes in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Susanne Väth & Michael Kirk, 2014. "Do property rights and contract farming matter for rural development? Evidence from a large-scale investment in Ghana," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201416, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    6. Benali, Marwan & Brümmer, Bernhard & Afari-Sefa, Victor, 2017. "Small producer participation in export vegetable supply chains and poverty: evidence from different export schemes in Tanzania," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 262583, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    7. Goedele Van den Broeck & Kaat Van Hoyweghen & Miet Maertens, 2016. "Employment Conditions in the Senegalese Horticultural Export Industry: A Worker Perspective," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(2), pages 301-319, March.
    8. Aashish Argade & Laha, A. K., 2018. "Marketplace Options in an Emerging Economy Local Food Marketing System- Producers’ Choices, Choice Determinants and Requirements," IIMA Working Papers WP 2018-01-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    9. Debela, B.L. & Demmler, K.M. & Klasen, S. & Qaim, M., 2018. "Supermarket purchase and child nutritional outcomes in urban Kenya," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277078, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Meemken, Eva-Marie & Veettil, Prakashan Chellattan & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Toward Improving the Design of Sustainability Standards—A Gendered Analysis of Farmers’ Preferences," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 285-298.
    11. Thorpe, Jodie, 2018. "Procedural Justice in Value Chains Through Public–private Partnerships," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 162-175.
    12. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2022. "Rubber In French Indochina," OSF Preprints yzdp6, Center for Open Science.
    13. Ochieng, Dennis O. & Veettil, Prakashan C. & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Farmers’ preferences for supermarket contracts in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 100-111.
    14. Mai Chiem Tuyen & Prapinwadee Sirisupluxana & Isriya Bunyasiri & Pham Xuan Hung, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Preferences towards Contract Attributes: Evidence from Rice Production in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Xhoxhi, Orjon & Pedersen, Søren Marcus & Lind, Kim Martin & Yazar, Attila, 2014. "The Determinants of Intermediaries’ Power over Farmers’ Margin-Related Activities: Evidence from Adana, Turkey," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 815-827.
    16. Susanne Väth & Simone Gobien, 2014. "Life Satisfaction, Contract Farming and Property Rights: Evidence from Ghana," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201415, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    17. Chaboud, Géraldine & Moustier, Paule, 2021. "The role of diverse distribution channels in reducing food loss and waste: The case of the Cali tomato supply chain in Colombia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2022. "Market Formation In Tbong Khmum," OSF Preprints jg5qz, Center for Open Science.
    19. Rabia Mazhar & Bi Xuehao & Thomas Dogot & Rytis Skominas & Vjekoslav Tanaskovik & Hossein Azadi & Zou Wei, 2022. "Contract Farming and Technical Efficiency: A Case of Export-Oriented Organic Rice Farmers in Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Bidault, Francis & de la Torre, José R. & Zanakis, Stelios H. & Ring, Peter Smith, 2018. "Willingness to rely on trust in global business collaborations: Context vs. demography," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 373-391.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:56:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-019-00377-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.