IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opmare/v16y2023i1d10.1007_s12063-022-00288-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analytic network process model to prioritize supply chain risks in green residential megaprojects

Author

Listed:
  • A. M. Alamdari

    (University of Tabriz)

  • Y. Jabarzadeh

    (Liverpool John Moores University)

  • B. Adams

    (Florida State University
    Decision Lens Inc.)

  • D. Samson

    (The University of Melbourne)

  • S. Khanmohammadi

    (University of Tabriz)

Abstract

Megaprojects and specifically ‘green’ construction of residential megaprojects can contain significant risks of failure. To design proper risk mitigation strategies, after identifying key risk factors, the next step is to conduct assessments that would facilitate the process of risk element prioritization. Risk assessment comprises the establishment of factor interrelation and discerning the indicators of importance. This research proposes a novel version of an integrated prioritization method and analyzes twelve all-inclusive key supply chain oriented risk factors identified in a previous study. Through a comprehensive literature review three criteria, impact, probability, and manageability are selected. Also, a fourth criterion namely influence rate is included in the model, based on the driving powers that can also be derived from the Interpretive Structural Modeling’s (ISM) assessment. Fundamentally, the calculations hinge on the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method which provides an assessment of the alternatives’ weights based on pairwise comparisons concerning the criteria specified. To enhance the accuracy of the perceptive judgments of the expert panelists, a bell-shaped fuzzy function is used to convert the verbal statements to crisp values. In addition, Row Sensitivity Analysis is administered to check the stability of the results and provide predictive scenarios. To validate the model, a case study, located in Iran, was conducted, where an expert panel consisting of four individuals made the pair-wise comparisons through an ANP questionnaire. Results indicate priority and sensitivity of the alternatives concerning criteria, for the case under study.

Suggested Citation

  • A. M. Alamdari & Y. Jabarzadeh & B. Adams & D. Samson & S. Khanmohammadi, 2023. "An analytic network process model to prioritize supply chain risks in green residential megaprojects," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 141-163, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-022-00288-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12063-022-00288-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12063-022-00288-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12063-022-00288-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Venkatesh, V.G. & Rathi, Snehal & Patwa, Sriyans, 2015. "Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using Interpretive structural modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 153-167.
    2. Wenmei Fei & Alex Opoku & Kofi Agyekum & James Anthony Oppon & Vian Ahmed & Charles Chen & Ka Leung Lok, 2021. "The Critical Role of the Construction Industry in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Delivering Projects for the Common Good," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    3. William Ho & Tian Zheng & Hakan Yildiz & Srinivas Talluri, 2015. "Supply chain risk management: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 5031-5069, August.
    4. Bon-Gang Hwang & Ming Shan & Helena Phua & Seokho Chi, 2017. "An Exploratory Analysis of Risks in Green Residential Building Construction Projects: The Case of Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2013. "The Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 1-40, Springer.
    6. Kheybari, Siamak & Rezaie, Fariba Mahdi & Farazmand, Hadis, 2020. "Analytic network process: An overview of applications," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    7. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2013. "Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-7279-7, December.
    8. Vargas, Luis G., 2008. "The consistency index in reciprocal matrices: Comparison of deterministic and statistical approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(2), pages 454-463, December.
    9. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2014. "What You Should Know About Megaprojects, and Why: An Overview," Papers 1409.0003, arXiv.org.
    10. Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kumar, Pradeep & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2015. "Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 375-390.
    11. Sanjay Jharkharia & Ravi Shankar, 2004. "IT enablement of supply chains: modeling the enablers," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 53(8), pages 700-712, December.
    12. Golany, B. & Kress, M., 1993. "A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matrices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 210-220, September.
    13. Djalma Araújo Rangel & Taiane Kamel de Oliveira & Maria Silene Alexandre Leite, 2015. "Supply chain risk classification: discussion and proposal," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(22), pages 6868-6887, November.
    14. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    15. D. Laurie Hughes & Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 2020. "Elucidation of IS project success factors: an interpretive structural modelling approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 35-66, February.
    16. Giannakis, Mihalis & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 455-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    2. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    3. Chowdhury, Nighat Afroz & Ali, Syed Mithun & Mahtab, Zuhayer & Rahman, Towfique & Kabir, Golam & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar, 2019. "A structural model for investigating the driving and dependence power of supply chain risks in the readymade garment industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 102-113.
    4. Wu, Chen-Fa & Wang, Hsiao-Hsuan & Chen, Szu-Hung & Trac, Luu Van Thong, 2024. "Assessing the efficiency of bird habitat conservation strategies in farmland ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    5. Nikelowski, Lukas & Voss, Rika, 2021. "Approach for application-specific selection of risk assessment methods," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 853-877, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    6. Tobias Rebs & Marcus Brandenburg & Stefan Seuring & Margarita Stohler, 2018. "Stakeholder influences and risks in sustainable supply chain management: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative studies," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(2), pages 197-237, September.
    7. Soumyatanu Mukherjee & Sidhartha S. Padhi, 2022. "Sourcing decision under interconnected risks: an application of mean–variance preferences approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1243-1268, June.
    8. Diogo Rodrigues & Radu Godina & Pedro Espadinha da Cruz, 2021. "Key Performance Indicators Selection through an Analytic Network Process Model for Tooling and Die Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Aysu Göçer & Stanley E. Fawcett & Okan Tuna, 2018. "What Does the Sustainability-Risk Interaction Look Like? Exploring Nuanced Relationships in Emerging Economy Sustainability Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    10. Liu, Fang & Zou, Shu-Cai & Li, Qing, 2020. "Deriving priorities from pairwise comparison matrices with a novel consistency index," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    11. Mohammed Ifkirne & Houssam El Bouhi & Siham Acharki & Quoc Bao Pham & Abdelouahed Farah & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, 2022. "Multi-Criteria GIS-Based Analysis for Mapping Suitable Sites for Onshore Wind Farms in Southeast France," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    12. Chand, Pushpendu & Thakkar, Jitesh J. & Ghosh, Kunal Kanti, 2020. "Analysis of supply chain sustainability with supply chain complexity, inter-relationship study using delphi and interpretive structural modeling for Indian mining and earthmoving machinery industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Silvia Carpitella & Ilyas Mzougui & Joaquín Izquierdo, 2022. "Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(3), pages 769-785, September.
    14. Yuan-Wei Du & Yi-Pin Fan, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Agricultural Sustainability Assessment: A Study across 30 Chinese Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Toly Chen, 2021. "A diversified AHP-tree approach for multiple-criteria supplier selection," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 431-453, October.
    16. Shafiee, Mohammad & Zare-Mehrjerdi, Yahia & Govindan, Kannan & Dastgoshade, Sohaib, 2022. "A causality analysis of risks to perishable product supply chain networks during the COVID-19 outbreak era: An extended DEMATEL method under Pythagorean fuzzy environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    17. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Selvik, Jon T. & Asche, Frank & Abrahamsen, HÃ¥kon Bjorheim, 2020. "Prioritising investments in safety measures in the chemical industry by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Paweł Ziemba, 2019. "Inter-Criteria Dependencies-Based Decision Support in the Sustainable wind Energy Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-29, February.
    20. Guangying Jin, 2022. "Designer Selection for Complex Engineering System Design Projects Considering the Disciplines Demanded," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opmare:v:16:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s12063-022-00288-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.