IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v59y2022i3d10.1007_s12597-021-00568-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Carpitella

    (Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Czech Academy of Sciences)

  • Ilyas Mzougui

    (Abdelmalek Essaadi University)

  • Joaquín Izquierdo

    (Universitat Politècnica de València)

Abstract

Management of complex supply networks is a fundamental business topic today. Especially in the presence of many and diverse stakeholders, identifying and assessing those risks having a potential negative impact on the performance of supply processes is of utmost importance and, as a result, implementing focused risk management actions is a current lively field of research. The possibility of supporting Supply Chain Risks Management (SCRM) is herein explored from a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)-based perspective. The sorting method ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (ELECTRE) TRI is proposed as a structural procedure to classify Supply Chain Risks (SCRs) into proper risk classes expressing priority of intervention so as to ease the implementation of prevention and protection measures. This approach is intended to offer structured management insights by means of an immediate identification of the most highly critical risks in a wide set of previously identified SCRs. A real-world case study in the field of the automotive industry is implemented to show the applicability and usefulness of the approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Carpitella & Ilyas Mzougui & Joaquín Izquierdo, 2022. "Multi-criteria risk classification to enhance complex supply networks performance," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(3), pages 769-785, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:59:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-021-00568-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-021-00568-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-021-00568-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-021-00568-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Supply Chain Risk Management," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 3-11, Springer.
    2. Nitin Kumar Sahu & Atul Kumar Sahu & Anoop Kumar Sahu, 2015. "Appraisement and benchmarking of third-party logistic service provider by exploration of risk-based approach," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1121637-112, December.
    3. Thun, Jörn-Henrik & Hoenig, Daniel, 2011. "An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 242-249, May.
    4. Veepan Kumar & Prem Vrat & Ravi Shankar, 2021. "Prioritization of strategies to overcome the barriers in Industry 4.0: a hybrid MCDM approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(3), pages 711-750, September.
    5. Eugene Levner & Alexander Ptuskin, 2015. "An entropy-based approach to identifying vulnerable components in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(22), pages 6888-6902, November.
    6. Yasemin Merzifonluoglu, 2015. "Impact of risk aversion and backup supplier on sourcing decisions of a firm," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(22), pages 6937-6961, November.
    7. Tang, Christopher & Tomlin, Brian, 2008. "The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 12-27, November.
    8. Garvey, Myles D. & Carnovale, Steven, 2020. "The rippled newsvendor: A new inventory framework for modeling supply chain risk severity in the presence of risk propagation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. Shahrbanoo Rezaei & Iman Ghalehkhondabi & Majid Rafiee & Soudabeh Namdar Zanganeh, 2020. "Supplier selection and order allocation in CLSC configuration with various supply strategies under disruption risk," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(3), pages 908-934, September.
    10. Rosangela Maria Vanalle & W.C. Lucato & G.M.D. Ganga & A.G. Alves Filho, 2020. "Risk management in the automotive supply chain: an exploratory study in Brazil," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 783-799, February.
    11. William Ho & Tian Zheng & Hakan Yildiz & Srinivas Talluri, 2015. "Supply chain risk management: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 5031-5069, August.
    12. Giannakis, Mihalis & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2016. "Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 455-470.
    13. Munir, Manal & Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. ManMohan S. Sodhi & Christopher S. Tang, 2012. "Researchers’ Perspectives on Supply-Chain Risk Research," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Managing Supply Chain Risk, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 281-301, Springer.
    15. D. G. Mogale & Sri Krishna Kumar & Manoj Kumar Tiwari, 2020. "Green food supply chain design considering risk and post-harvest losses: a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(1), pages 257-284, December.
    16. Ramkrishna S. Bharsakade & Padmanava Acharya & L. Ganapathy & Manoj K. Tiwari, 2021. "A lean approach to healthcare management using multi criteria decision making," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(3), pages 610-635, September.
    17. Wang, Hua & Gu, Tao & Jin, Maozhu & Zhao, Rong & Wang, Guanxiang, 2018. "The complexity measurement and evolution analysis of supply chain network under disruption risks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 72-78.
    18. Mulliner, Emma & Malys, Naglis & Maliene, Vida, 2016. "Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 146-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christian Manuel Moreno Rocha & Daina Arenas Buelvas & Sandra De la Hoz Escorcia, 2024. "Evaluation and Ranking of Energy Alternatives for Implementation in Different Geographic Scenarios using Decision Methods: Case Study of Colombia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 191-202, September.
    2. Hailemariam Gebru & Baba Abdissa & Betelhem Addis & Sisay Alebachew & Abaysew Ayele, 2023. "Selection of conventional preservation technologies using analytical hierarchy process," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(1), pages 217-233, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    2. ur Rehman, Attique & Shakeel Sadiq Jajja, Muhammad & Farooq, Sami, 2022. "Manufacturing planning and control driven supply chain risk management: A dynamic capability perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Soumyatanu Mukherjee & Sidhartha S. Padhi, 2022. "Sourcing decision under interconnected risks: an application of mean–variance preferences approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(2), pages 1243-1268, June.
    4. Chowdhury, Nighat Afroz & Ali, Syed Mithun & Mahtab, Zuhayer & Rahman, Towfique & Kabir, Golam & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar, 2019. "A structural model for investigating the driving and dependence power of supply chain risks in the readymade garment industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 102-113.
    5. Jamshed Raza & Yuxin Liu & Jianwei Zhang & Nan Zhu & Zohaib Hassan & Habib Gul & Sikander Hussain, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Management Practices and Sustainability Performance: The Dynamic Capability Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    6. Subodha Kumar & Rakesh R. Mallipeddi, 2022. "Impact of cybersecurity on operations and supply chain management: Emerging trends and future research directions," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4488-4500, December.
    7. Singh, Nitya P. & Hong, Paul C., 2020. "Impact of strategic and operational risk management practices on firm performance: An empirical investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 723-735.
    8. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    9. Basu R, Jothi & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Yuvaraj, M., 2023. "Improving agility and resilience of automotive spares supply chain: The additive manufacturing enabled truck model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Qazi, Abroon & Dickson, Alex & Quigley, John & Gaudenzi, Barbara, 2018. "Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 24-42.
    11. Célestin Elock Son, 2018. "Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review of Thirteen Years of Research," Post-Print hal-03029453, HAL.
    12. El Baz, Jamal & Ruel, Salomée, 2021. "Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    13. Oliva, Fábio Lotti, 2016. "A maturity model for enterprise risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 66-79.
    14. Sreedevi, R. & Saranga, Haritha, 2017. "Uncertainty and supply chain risk: The moderating role of supply chain flexibility in risk mitigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 332-342.
    15. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Cao, Yunzhi, 2021. "The optimal recovery-fund based strategy for uncertain supply chain disruptions: A risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Muhammad Junaid & Ye Xue & Muzzammil Wasim Syed & Ji Zu Li & Muhammad Ziaullah, 2019. "A Neutrosophic AHP and TOPSIS Framework for Supply Chain Risk Assessment in Automotive Industry of Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    17. Şenay Ağca & John R. Birge & Zi'ang Wang & Jing Wu, 2023. "The impact of COVID‐19 on supply chain credit risk," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(12), pages 4088-4113, December.
    18. Jung-Yu Lai & Juite Wang & Yi-Hsuan Chiu, 2021. "Evaluating blockchain technology for reducing supply chain risks," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1089-1111, December.
    19. Shuting Li & Xiangfeng Chen, 2019. "The role of supplier collaboration and risk management capabilities in managing product complexity," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 146-158, December.
    20. Marcelo Martins de Sa & Alexandre Luis Prim & Laura Birou, 2023. "With major risks comes great resilience: the COVID-19 effect on SMEs in a developing country," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 1043-1055, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:59:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s12597-021-00568-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.