IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v21y2021i2d10.1007_s12351-019-00468-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decomposition based extended project scheduling for make-to-order production

Author

Listed:
  • Arda Turkgenci

    (Baskent University)

  • Huseyin Guden

    (Eastern Mediterranean University)

  • Mehmet Gülşen

    (Baskent University)

Abstract

Project scheduling has a critical function for many companies. Although there is a vast literature dedicated to the development of solution methodologies, the real-life applications of those techniques are few and often require over-simplification of the real-life problem. This study deals with the implementation of a project scheduling routine for a “make-to-order” machinery manufacturer. Although the problem is very similar to a resource-constrained project scheduling problem (RCPSP), which is a well-known and well-studied problem in the literature, it has multi-project and multi-mode components which make the project planning more challenging. Because of the multi-dimensional complexity of the problem, it is called a “Rich Project Scheduling Problem”. Our approach employs two techniques to deal with the issue of complexity. The first one is regarding calculation of the latest start time for each activity in the project. The second one is the decomposition method that includes breaking down the big problem into small manageable pieces. The approach was tested on real-life problems of a machine-building company. We also built more complex test cases from the real projects for testing purposes. Our approach produced high-quality solutions to the complex project scheduling problems within reasonable time limits. This work contributes to current research in several ways. An extension to the RCPSP formulation to include multi-project and multi-mode problems is introduced and successfully used for solving real-life problems. Additionally, activities of an RCPSP can be split into multiple sub-activities. Doing so is called preemption. The proposed formulation permits mode-switching during the execution of an activity, and it uses an alternative methodology to calculate latest activity start times.

Suggested Citation

  • Arda Turkgenci & Huseyin Guden & Mehmet Gülşen, 2021. "Decomposition based extended project scheduling for make-to-order production," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 801-825, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:21:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-019-00468-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-019-00468-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-019-00468-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-019-00468-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mireille Palpant & Christian Artigues & Philippe Michelon, 2004. "LSSPER: Solving the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem with Large Neighbourhood Search," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 237-257, October.
    2. Patterson, James H. & Brian Talbot, F. & Slowinski, Roman & Weglarz, Jan, 1990. "Computational experience with a backtracking algorithm for solving a general class of precedence and resource-constrained scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 68-79, November.
    3. A. Alan B. Pritsker & Lawrence J. Waiters & Philip M. Wolfe, 1969. "Multiproject Scheduling with Limited Resources: A Zero-One Programming Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 93-108, September.
    4. Gonçalves, J.F. & Mendes, J.J.M. & Resende, M.G.C., 2008. "A genetic algorithm for the resource constrained multi-project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1171-1190, September.
    5. Demeulemeester, Erik L. & Herroelen, Willy S., 1996. "An efficient optimal solution procedure for the preemptive resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 334-348, April.
    6. Ali Shirzadeh Chaleshtari, 2017. "Corrigendum to “Resource Tardiness Weighted Cost Minimization in Project Scheduling”," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-1, July.
    7. F. Brian Talbot, 1982. "Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling with Time-Resource Tradeoffs: The Nonpreemptive Case," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(10), pages 1197-1210, October.
    8. Heilmann, Roland, 2003. "A branch-and-bound procedure for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with minimum and maximum time lags," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 348-365, January.
    9. Anıl Can & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2014. "Multi-project scheduling with two-stage decomposition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 95-116, June.
    10. Ballestí­n, Francisco & Valls, Vicente & Quintanilla, Sacramento, 2008. "Pre-emption in resource-constrained project scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 1136-1152, September.
    11. Ali Shirzadeh Chaleshtari, 2017. "Resource Tardiness Weighted Cost Minimization in Project Scheduling," Advances in Operations Research, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-11, January.
    12. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Brucker, Peter & Drexl, Andreas & Mohring, Rolf & Neumann, Klaus & Pesch, Erwin, 1999. "Resource-constrained project scheduling: Notation, classification, models, and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 3-41, January.
    14. S. Selcuk Erenguc & Taeho Ahn & Daniel G. Conway, 2001. "The resource constrained project scheduling problem with multiple crashable modes: An exact solution method," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 107-127, March.
    15. Beşikci, Umut & Bilge, Ümit & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2015. "Multi-mode resource constrained multi-project scheduling and resource portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 22-31.
    16. Babu, A. J. G. & Suresh, Nalina, 1996. "Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 320-327, January.
    17. Peteghem, Vincent Van & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 409-418, March.
    18. I. Kurtulus & E. W. Davis, 1982. "Multi-Project Scheduling: Categorization of Heuristic Rules Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 161-172, February.
    19. Sprecher, Arno & Drexl, Andreas, 1998. "Multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling by a simple, general and powerful sequencing algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 431-450, June.
    20. A Sprecher, 2002. "Network decomposition techniques for resource-constrained project scheduling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(4), pages 405-414, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weglarz, Jan & Józefowska, Joanna & Mika, Marek & Waligóra, Grzegorz, 2011. "Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes - A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(3), pages 177-205, February.
    2. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2010. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Kellenbrink, Carolin & Helber, Stefan, 2015. "Scheduling resource-constrained projects with a flexible project structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 379-391.
    4. Gómez Sánchez, Mariam & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Fernández Gil, Alejandro & Castro, Carlos & Voß, Stefan, 2023. "Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 958-976.
    5. Ben Issa, Samer & Patterson, Raymond A. & Tu, Yiliu, 2021. "Solving resource-constrained multi-project environment under different activity assumptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    6. Fündeling, C.-U. & Trautmann, N., 2010. "A priority-rule method for project scheduling with work-content constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 568-574, June.
    7. Peteghem, Vincent Van & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2010. "A genetic algorithm for the preemptive and non-preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 409-418, March.
    8. Alexander Tesch, 2020. "A polyhedral study of event-based models for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 233-251, April.
    9. Browning, Tyson R. & Yassine, Ali A., 2010. "Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling: Priority rule performance revisited," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 212-228, August.
    10. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    11. Moukrim, Aziz & Quilliot, Alain & Toussaint, Hélène, 2015. "An effective branch-and-price algorithm for the Preemptive Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem based on minimal Interval Order Enumeration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 360-368.
    12. Alireza Etminaniesfahani & Hanyu Gu & Leila Moslemi Naeni & Amir Salehipour, 2024. "An efficient relax-and-solve method for the multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 41-68, July.
    13. Aidin Delgoshaei & Timon Rabczuk & Ahad Ali & Mohd Khairol Anuar Ariffin, 2017. "An applicable method for modifying over-allocated multi-mode resource constraint schedules in the presence of preemptive resources," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 259(1), pages 85-117, December.
    14. T Wauters & K Verbeeck & G Vanden Berghe & P De Causmaecker, 2011. "Learning agents for the multi-mode project scheduling problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(2), pages 281-290, February.
    15. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2008. "A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," Working Paper Series 02/2008, Hamburg School of Business Administration (HSBA).
    16. Hartmann, Sönke & Briskorn, Dirk, 2022. "An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 1-14.
    17. Abdollah Arasteh, 2020. "Considering Project Management Activities for Engineering Design Groups," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 1-29, December.
    18. Bredael, Dries & Vanhoucke, Mario, 2023. "Multi-project scheduling: A benchmark analysis of metaheuristic algorithms on various optimisation criteria and due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 54-75.
    19. Yukang He & Tao Jia & Weibo Zheng, 2024. "Simulated annealing for centralised resource-constrained multiproject scheduling to minimise the maximal cash flow gap under different payment patterns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 115-149, July.
    20. Behrad Barghi & Shahram Shadrokh Sikari, 2022. "Meta-heuristic Solution with Considering Setup Time for Multi-Skilled Project Scheduling Problem," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:21:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-019-00468-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.