IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v80y2016i2d10.1007_s11069-015-2023-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-temporal remote sensing data and spectral indices analysis for detection tropical rainforest degradation: case study in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts, West Kalimantan, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Parwati Sofan

    (Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN))

  • Yenni Vetrita

    (Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN))

  • Fajar Yulianto

    (Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN))

  • Muhammad Rokhis Khomarudin

    (Indonesian National Institute of Aeronautics and Space (LAPAN))

Abstract

According to the forest statistic data, the forest degradation in West Kalimantan has been increasing since 2006. The satellite remote sensing data can provide information more effective and economical input rather than direct field observation that is difficult to access. In this research, we applied a spectral index derived from remote sensing satellite data, the Normalized Difference Fraction Index (NDFI), then compared it with the widely used forest degradation index, the Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) and the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), in order to have an enhanced detection of forest canopy damage caused by selective logging activities and associated forest fires in West Kalimantan, especially in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts. The NDFI was derived from combination of green vegetation, shadow, soil, and non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) fractions images from spectral mixture analysis model. The NBR and NDVI were generated from spectral reflectance values of near-infrared, shortwave infrared, and red spectrums. The satellite data used for monitoring forest degradation were Landsat-year 2006–2009 and then continued with 4-year SPOT 2009–2012. The result showed that the forest degradation was detected initially in 2008 up to 2012 in the research area. Spectral indices analysis (NDFI, NBR, NDVI) was tested and verified by ground survey data in 2012. We found that NDFI has higher accuracy (95 %) to classify the degradation forest due to logging and burning activities rather than NBR or NDVI. The forest degradation mapping also conducted using mosaic of Landsat data year 2000–2009 for whole of West Kalimantan province. This method is suitable for a forest degradation monitoring tool in tropical rainforest.

Suggested Citation

  • Parwati Sofan & Yenni Vetrita & Fajar Yulianto & Muhammad Rokhis Khomarudin, 2016. "Multi-temporal remote sensing data and spectral indices analysis for detection tropical rainforest degradation: case study in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts, West Kalimantan, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 1279-1301, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:80:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-015-2023-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-2023-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-015-2023-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-015-2023-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter M. Cox & David Pearson & Ben B. Booth & Pierre Friedlingstein & Chris Huntingford & Chris D. Jones & Catherine M. Luke, 2013. "Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability," Nature, Nature, vol. 494(7437), pages 341-344, February.
    2. Daniel C. Nepstad & Adalberto Verssimo & Ane Alencar & Carlos Nobre & Eirivelthon Lima & Paul Lefebvre & Peter Schlesinger & Christopher Potter & Paulo Moutinho & Elsa Mendoza & Mark Cochrane & Vaness, 1999. "Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire," Nature, Nature, vol. 398(6727), pages 505-508, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parwati Sofan & Yenni Vetrita & Fajar Yulianto & Muhammad Khomarudin, 2016. "Multi-temporal remote sensing data and spectral indices analysis for detection tropical rainforest degradation: case study in Kapuas Hulu and Sintang districts, West Kalimantan, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(2), pages 1279-1301, January.
    2. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Aravena, Claudia & Castillo, Natalia & Ehrlich, Marco & Taou, Nadia & Wagner, Thomas, 2022. "Agroforestry Programs in the Colombian Amazon: Selection, Treatment and Exposure Effects on Deforestation," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 537, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    3. Boltz, Frederick & Holmes, Thomas P. & Carter, Douglas R., 2003. "Economic and environmental impacts of conventional and reduced-impact logging in Tropical South America: a comparative review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 69-81, January.
    4. U. Persson & Christian Azar, 2007. "Tropical deforestation in a future international climate policy regime—lessons from the Brazilian Amazon," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(7), pages 1277-1304, August.
    5. Kim, Sophanarith & Phat, Nophea Kim & Koike, Masao & Hayashi, Hiromichi, 2006. "Estimating actual and potential government revenues from timber harvesting in Cambodia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(6), pages 625-635, August.
    6. Tommaso Sonno & Davide Zufacchi, 2022. "Epidemics and rapacity of multinational companies," CEP Discussion Papers dp1833, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    7. Daniella Tiemi Sasaki Okida & Osmar Abílio de Carvalho Júnior & Osmar Luiz Ferreira de Carvalho & Roberto Arnaldo Trancoso Gomes & Renato Fontes Guimarães, 2021. "Relationship between Land Property Security and Brazilian Amazon Deforestation in the Mato Grosso State during the Period 2013–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Tola Gemechu Ango & Kristoffer Hylander & Lowe Börjeson, 2020. "Processes of Forest Cover Change since 1958 in the Coffee-Producing Areas of Southwest Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-29, August.
    9. Kailiang Yu & Philippe Ciais & Sonia I. Seneviratne & Zhihua Liu & Han Y. H. Chen & Jonathan Barichivich & Craig D. Allen & Hui Yang & Yuanyuan Huang & Ashley P. Ballantyne, 2022. "Field-based tree mortality constraint reduces estimates of model-projected forest carbon sinks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Lucas Schroeder & Mauricio Roberto Veronez & Eniuce Menezes de Souza & Diego Brum & Luiz Gonzaga & Vinicius Francisco Rofatto, 2020. "Respiratory Diseases, Malaria and Leishmaniasis: Temporal and Spatial Association with Fire Occurrences from Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Derek Sheehan & Katrina Mullan & Thales A. P. West & Erin O. Semmens, 2024. "Protecting Life and Lung: Protected Areas Affect Fine Particulate Matter and Respiratory Hospitalizations in the Brazilian Amazon Biome," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(1), pages 45-87, January.
    12. Prates-Clark, Cássia Da Conceição & Saatchi, Sassan S. & Agosti, Donat, 2008. "Predicting geographical distribution models of high-value timber trees in the Amazon Basin using remotely sensed data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 309-323.
    13. Srinet, Ritika & Nandy, Subrata & Patel, N.R. & Padalia, Hitendra & Watham, Taibanganba & Singh, Sanjeev K. & Chauhan, Prakash, 2023. "Simulation of forest carbon fluxes by integrating remote sensing data into biome-BGC model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 475(C).
    14. In-Hong Park & Sang-Wook Yeh & Wenju Cai & Guojian Wang & Seung-Ki Min & Sang-Ki Lee, 2023. "Present-day North Atlantic salinity constrains future warming of the Northern Hemisphere," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 13(8), pages 816-822, August.
    15. Jie Lu & Fengqin Yan, 2023. "The Divergent Resistance and Resilience of Forest and Grassland Ecosystems to Extreme Summer Drought in Carbon Sequestration," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Mohebalian, Phillip M. & Aguilar, Francisco X., 2016. "Additionality and design of forest conservation programs: Insights from Ecuador's Socio Bosque Program," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 103-114.
    17. Fei Xue & Yi’na Hu, 2024. "Diverse Responses of Vegetation Greenness and Productivity to Land Use and Climate Change: A Comparison of Three Urban Agglomerations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Yan Yu & Jiafu Mao & Stan D. Wullschleger & Anping Chen & Xiaoying Shi & Yaoping Wang & Forrest M. Hoffman & Yulong Zhang & Eric Pierce, 2022. "Machine learning–based observation-constrained projections reveal elevated global socioeconomic risks from wildfire," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Fearnside, Philip M., 2003. "Conservation Policy in Brazilian Amazonia: Understanding the Dilemmas," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 757-779, May.
    20. Giudice, Renzo & Soares-Filho, Britaldo S. & Merry, Frank & Rodrigues, Hermann O. & Bowman, Maria, 2012. "Timber concessions in Madre de Dios: Are they a good deal?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 158-165.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:80:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-015-2023-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.