IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v120y2024i14d10.1007_s11069-024-06759-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding evacuation behavior for effective disaster preparedness: a hybrid machine learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Evangelos Karampotsis

    (University of the Aegean)

  • Kitty Kioskli

    (University of the Aegean
    Trustilio B.V.)

  • Athina Tsirimpa

    (University of the Aegean
    The American College of Greece)

  • Georgios Dounias

    (University of the Aegean)

  • Amalia Polydoropoulou

    (University of the Aegean)

Abstract

This paper delves into the pivotal role of machine learning in responding to natural disasters and understanding human behavior during crises. Natural disasters, from earthquakes to floods, have profound consequences for both the environment and society, impacting health, the economy, and mental well-being. Prevention and preparedness are key components of disaster management, yet the psychological challenges faced by affected individuals are equally significant. Psychosocial support and educational programs play a vital role in aiding individuals in their recovery. Machine learning, in this context, offers the ability to predict the evolution of natural disasters, providing early warnings that can save lives and reduce losses. It further extends to analyzing data related to human behavior during disasters, enhancing readiness for future calamities. This study specifically addresses the challenge of understanding human behavior during a snowstorm that struck Greece in 2023, employing artificial intelligence techniques to develop classification models categorizing individuals into three distinct groups based on socio-economic characteristics and is one of the few machine learning approaches that have been performed to date on data derived from corresponding questionnaire surveys. Artificial intelligence methodologies were harnessed to construct these classification models, with a focus on categorizing individuals into three specific classes: "Did not travel at all", "Traveled only as necessary", or “Did not limit travel”. The dataset employed in this study was collected through a survey conducted within the framework of the AEGIS+ research project, concentrating on assessing the mental health of individuals impacted by natural disasters. The goal was to generalize the optimal classification model and extract knowledge applicable in natural disaster scenarios. Three methodological frameworks for data analysis were proposed, incorporating combinations of Simple Logistic Regression and Inductive Decision Trees with the SMOTE data balancing method and a new data balancing method called LCC (Leveling of Cases per Class), within the context of validation procedures like “Use Train Set,” “10-fold Cross Validation,” and “Hold Out.” This paper’s contribution lies in the development of hybrid classification models, highlighting the significance of data balancing with LCC method throughout the modeling process. The results were deemed satisfactory, with the inductive decision tree method demonstrating superior performance (Classification accuracy near to 90%). This approach, offering strong classification rules, holds potential for knowledge application in natural disaster risk management. Knowledge Mining and Metadata Analysis further revealed the socio-economic characteristics influencing the decision to move during a natural disaster, including age, education, work-status, and workstyle. Crucially, this work, in addition to providing knowledge through the data mining process that can be used to estimate evacuation probability, develop targeted emergency information messages, and improve evacuation planning, is also used as a catalyst for future research efforts. It encourages the collection of relevant data, the exploration of new challenges in data analysis related to natural disasters and mental health, and the development of new data balancing methods and hybrid data analysis methodological frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Evangelos Karampotsis & Kitty Kioskli & Athina Tsirimpa & Georgios Dounias & Amalia Polydoropoulou, 2024. "Understanding evacuation behavior for effective disaster preparedness: a hybrid machine learning approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(14), pages 13627-13665, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:14:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06759-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-024-06759-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-024-06759-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-024-06759-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cheuk-Kay Sun & Yun-Xuan Tang & Tzu-Chi Liu & Chi-Jie Lu, 2022. "An Integrated Machine Learning Scheme for Predicting Mammographic Anomalies in High-Risk Individuals Using Questionnaire-Based Predictors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Zhao, Bingyu & Wong, Stephen D, 2021. "Developing Transportation Response Strategies for Wildfire Evacuations via an Empirically Supported Traffic Simulation of Berkeley, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt70p6k4rf, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Sunhae Kim & Hye-Kyung Lee & Kounseok Lee, 2021. "Which PHQ-9 Items Can Effectively Screen for Suicide? Machine Learning Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Dulebenets, Maxim A. & Abioye, Olumide F. & Ozguven, Eren Erman & Moses, Ren & Boot, Walter R. & Sando, Thobias, 2019. "Development of statistical models for improving efficiency of emergency evacuation in areas with vulnerable population," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 233-249.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Yao & Xiaohua Zhao & Hongji Du & Yunlong Zhang & Guohui Zhang & Jian Rong, 2019. "Classification of Fatigued and Drunk Driving Based on Decision Tree Methods: A Simulator Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Liu, Zhichen & Li, Ying & Zhang, Zhaoyi & Yu, Wenbo, 2022. "A new evacuation accessibility analysis approach based on spatial information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    3. Zhou, Jianfeng & Reniers, Genserik, 2022. "Petri-net based cooperation modeling and time analysis of emergency response in the context of domino effect prevention in process industries," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi & Naveed Ahmad & Muhammad Salman & Nida Tanveer & Shahid Shah & Muhammad Hammad Butt & Ahmed D. Alatawi & Nasser Hadal Alotaibi & Hidayat Ur Rahman & Abdulaziz Ibrahim Alzarea &, 2022. "Estimation of Psychological Impairment and Coping Strategies during COVID-19 Pandemic among University Students in Saudi Arabia: A Large Regional Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Yung-Chuan Huang & Yu-Chen Cheng & Mao-Jhen Jhou & Mingchih Chen & Chi-Jie Lu, 2023. "Integrated Machine Learning Decision Tree Model for Risk Evaluation in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation When Taking Different Doses of Dabigatran," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. E. Ronchi & J. Wahlqvist & A. Ardinge & A. Rohaert & S. M. V. Gwynne & G. Rein & H. Mitchell & N. Kalogeropoulos & M. Kinateder & N. Bénichou & E. Kuligowski & A. Kimball, 2023. "The verification of wildland–urban interface fire evacuation models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(2), pages 1493-1519, June.
    7. Abioye, Olumide F. & Dulebenets, Maxim A. & Ozguven, Eren Erman & Moses, Ren & Boot, Walter R. & Sando, Thobias, 2020. "Assessing perceived driving difficulties under emergency evacuation for vulnerable population groups," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Grajdura, Sarah & Niemeier, Deb, 2022. "Improving Our Understanding of Fire Evacuation and Displacement Effects," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6h99c6j0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Teichmann, Dusan & Dorda, Michal & Sousek, Radovan, 2021. "Creation of preventive mass evacuation plan with the use of public transport," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Krista J. Howard & Caleb Leong & Sidney Chambless & Timothy J. Grigsby & Millie Cordaro & Jessica K. Perrotte & Jeffrey T. Howard, 2022. "Major Depression in Postpartum Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Can Social Support Buffer Psychosocial Risks and Substance Use?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, November.
    11. Soga, Kenichi PhD & Comfort, Louise PhD & Li, Pengshun & Zhao, Bingyu PhD & Lorusso, Paola, 2024. "Testing Wildfire Evacuation Strategies and Coordination Plans for Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Communities in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt78n6n8rf, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    12. Qiong Bao & Hanrun Tang & Yongjun Shen, 2021. "Driving Behavior Based Relative Risk Evaluation Using a Nonparametric Optimization Method," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Juan F. Dols & Jaime Molina & F. Javier Camacho-Torregrosa & David Llopis-Castelló & Alfredo García, 2021. "Development of Driving Simulation Scenarios Based on Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Road Safety Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Wang, Xinjian & Liu, Zhengjiang & Loughney, Sean & Yang, Zaili & Wang, Yanfu & Wang, Jin, 2022. "Numerical analysis and staircase layout optimisation for a Ro-Ro passenger ship during emergency evacuation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Song, Chengcheng & Shao, Quan & Zhu, Pei & Dong, Min & Yu, Wenfei, 2023. "An emergency aircraft evacuation simulation considering passenger overtaking and luggage retrieval," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    16. Feng, Xinhang & Jiang, Yanli & Gai, Wenmei, 2024. "Rural community response to accidental toxic gas release: An individual emergency response model during self-organized evacuations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    17. Liu, Enze & Barker, Kash & Chen, Hong, 2022. "A multi-modal evacuation-based response strategy for mitigating disruption in an intercity railway system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:120:y:2024:i:14:d:10.1007_s11069-024-06759-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.