IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v117y2023i2d10.1007_s11069-023-05913-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The verification of wildland–urban interface fire evacuation models

Author

Listed:
  • E. Ronchi

    (Lund University)

  • J. Wahlqvist

    (Lund University)

  • A. Ardinge

    (Lund University)

  • A. Rohaert

    (Lund University)

  • S. M. V. Gwynne

    (Lund University
    Movement Strategies)

  • G. Rein

    (Imperial College London)

  • H. Mitchell

    (Imperial College London)

  • N. Kalogeropoulos

    (Imperial College London)

  • M. Kinateder

    (National Research Council)

  • N. Bénichou

    (National Research Council)

  • E. Kuligowski

    (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology)

  • A. Kimball

    (Fire Protection Research Foundation)

Abstract

This paper introduces a protocol for the verification of multi-physics wildfire evacuation models, including a set of tests used to ensure that the conceptual modelling representation of each modelling layer is accurately implemented, as well as the interactions between different modelling layers and sub-models (wildfire spread, pedestrian movement, traffic evacuation, and trigger buffers). This work presents a total of 24 verification tests, including (1) 4 tests related to pedestrians, (2) 15 tests for traffic evacuation, (3) 5 tests concerning the interaction between different modelling layers, along with 5 tests for wildfire spread and trigger buffers. The evacuation tests are organized in accordance with different core components related to evacuation modelling, namely Population, Pre-evacuation, Movement, Route/destination selection, Flow constraints, Events, Wildfire spread and Trigger buffers. A reporting template has also been developed to facilitate the application of the verification testing protocol. An example application of the testing protocol has been performed using an open wildfire evacuation modelling platform called WUI-NITY and its associated trigger buffer model k-PERIL. The verification testing protocol is deemed to improve the credibility of wildfire evacuation model results and stimulate future modelling efforts in this domain.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Ronchi & J. Wahlqvist & A. Ardinge & A. Rohaert & S. M. V. Gwynne & G. Rein & H. Mitchell & N. Kalogeropoulos & M. Kinateder & N. Bénichou & E. Kuligowski & A. Kimball, 2023. "The verification of wildland–urban interface fire evacuation models," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(2), pages 1493-1519, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05913-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-05913-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-05913-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-05913-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Bingyu & Wong, Stephen D, 2021. "Developing Transportation Response Strategies for Wildfire Evacuations via an Empirically Supported Traffic Simulation of Berkeley, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt70p6k4rf, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Wong, Stephen D PhD & Broader, Jacquelyn C & Walker, Joan L PhD & Shaheen, Susan A PhD, 2022. "Understanding California wildfire evacuee behavior and joint choice making," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4fm7d34j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Tian, Junfang & Treiber, Martin & Ma, Shoufeng & Jia, Bin & Zhang, Wenyi, 2015. "Microscopic driving theory with oscillatory congested states: Model and empirical verification," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 138-157.
    4. Wong, Stephen D & Chorus, Caspar G & Shaheen, Susan A & Walker, Joan L, 2020. "A Revealed Preference Methodology to Evaluate Regret Minimization with Challenging Choice Sets: A Wildfire Evacuation Case Study," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2k12q9ph, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. Wong, Stephen D., 2020. "Compliance, Congestion, and Social Equity: Tackling Critical Evacuation Challenges through the Sharing Economy, Joint Choice Modeling, and Regret Minimization," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9b51w7h6, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    6. Philip E. Dennison & Thomas J. Cova & Max A. Mortiz, 2007. "WUIVAC: a wildland-urban interface evacuation trigger model applied in strategic wildfire scenarios," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 41(1), pages 181-199, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wong, Stephen D. & Broader, Jacquelyn C. & Shaheen, Susan A. PhD, 2020. "Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5w85z07g, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Soga, Kenichi PhD & Comfort, Louise PhD & Li, Pengshun & Zhao, Bingyu PhD & Lorusso, Paola, 2024. "Testing Wildfire Evacuation Strategies and Coordination Plans for Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Communities in California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt78n6n8rf, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Tomoko Sakiyama & Ikuo Arizono, 2019. "Reversible Transitions in a Cellular Automata-Based Traffic Model with Driver Memory," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-8, December.
    4. Treiber, Martin & Kesting, Arne, 2018. "The Intelligent Driver Model with stochasticity – New insights into traffic flow oscillations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 613-623.
    5. Yuan, Zijian & Wang, Tao & Zhang, Jing & Li, Shubin, 2022. "Influences of dynamic safe headway on car-following behavior," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 591(C).
    6. Li, Yongfu & Zhao, Hang & Zhang, Li & Zhang, Chao, 2018. "An extended car-following model incorporating the effects of lateral gap and gradient," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 503(C), pages 177-189.
    7. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimag," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    8. Wong, Stephen D PhD & Broader, Jacquelyn C & Walker, Joan L PhD & Shaheen, Susan A PhD, 2022. "Understanding California wildfire evacuee behavior and joint choice making," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt4fm7d34j, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    9. Wang, Zhengli & Qi, Xin & Jiang, Hai, 2018. "Estimating the spatiotemporal impact of traffic incidents: An integer programming approach consistent with the propagation of shockwaves," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 356-369.
    10. Tian, Junfang & Li, Guangyu & Treiber, Martin & Jiang, Rui & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 560-575.
    11. Ye, Lanhang & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki, 2018. "Modeling connected and autonomous vehicles in heterogeneous traffic flow," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 269-277.
    12. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Wu, Hsi-Jen, 2015. "Driver perception uncertainty in perceived relative speed and reaction time in car following – A quantum optical flow perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 257-274.
    13. Joe Scott & Don Helmbrecht & Matthew Thompson & David Calkin & Kate Marcille, 2012. "Probabilistic assessment of wildfire hazard and municipal watershed exposure," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(1), pages 707-728, October.
    14. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    15. Werbeck, Anna, 2024. "Stated preferences and actual choices in german health insurance," Ruhr Economic Papers 1091, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    16. Chen, Tiantian & Fu, Xiaowen & Hensher, David A. & Li, Zhi-Chun & Sze, N.N., 2024. "Effects of proactive and reactive health control measures on public transport preferences of passengers – A stated preference study during the COVID-19 pandemic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 175-192.
    17. Zhang, Jing & Xu, Keyu & Li, Shubin & Wang, Tao, 2020. "A new two-lane lattice hydrodynamic model with the introduction of driver’s predictive effect," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 551(C).
    18. Milad Haghani & Michiel C. J. Bliemer & John M. Rose & Harmen Oppewal & Emily Lancsar, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity," Papers 2102.02940, arXiv.org.
    19. Dewen Kong & Xiucheng Guo & Bo Yang & Dingxin Wu, 2016. "Analyzing the Impact of Trucks on Traffic Flow Based on an Improved Cellular Automaton Model," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-14, September.
    20. Rosa Marina González & Concepción Román & Ángel Simón Marrero, 2021. "Values of Travel Time for Recreational Trips under Different Behavioural Rules," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05913-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.