IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v116y2023i3d10.1007_s11069-023-05843-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monte Carlo modeling of tornado hazard to wind turbines in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Romane Bouchard

    (McGill University)

  • Djordje Romanic

    (McGill University)

Abstract

Using a Monte Carlo hazard modeling approach, this study assesses the damage and losses to wind turbines caused by tornadoes over Germany. The model combines observed climatology of tornadoes, exposure map of wind turbines and their capacities, vulnerability curve (first developed in this study), and costs of wind turbines to estimate the likelihood of financial losses of different magnitudes. The losses are presented in terms of aggregated and highest annual losses as a function of the return period. Deterministic modeling of the vulnerability function produced larger variability of the most severe losses (rare, but high-intensity events) compared to the pseudorandom sampling of the damage from the vulnerability curve. Doubling the number of current wind turbines results in smaller expected losses than installing fewer but more powerful units (repowerment). Tornadoes are most frequent in the summer months when the capacity factors of wind farms are the lowest and the electricity consumption is also lower than in the winter months. By repeatedly placing a tornado track of a fixed size over the same wind farm, we further investigated the sensitivity of our model to different parameters. The probability of tornadoes of different intensities hitting a wind turbine over Germany is also calculated.

Suggested Citation

  • Romane Bouchard & Djordje Romanic, 2023. "Monte Carlo modeling of tornado hazard to wind turbines in Germany," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3899-3923, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:116:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05843-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-05843-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-05843-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-05843-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reinhold Totschnig & Walter Sedlacek & Sven Fuchs, 2011. "A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 58(2), pages 681-703, August.
    2. Marcus Eichhorn & Mattes Scheftelowitz & Matthias Reichmuth & Christian Lorenz & Kyriakos Louca & Alexander Schiffler & Rita Keuneke & Martin Bauschmann & Jens Ponitka & David Manske & Daniela Thrän, 2019. "Spatial Distribution of Wind Turbines, Photovoltaic Field Systems, Bioenergy, and River Hydro Power Plants in Germany," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Romanic, Djordje & Parvu, Dan & Refan, Maryam & Hangan, Horia, 2018. "Wind and tornado climatologies and wind resource modelling for a modern development situated in “Tornado Alley”," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 97-112.
    4. James B Elsner & Thomas H Jagger & Ian J Elsner, 2014. "Tornado Intensity Estimated from Damage Path Dimensions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-7, September.
    5. Blanco, María Isabel, 2009. "The economics of wind energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(6-7), pages 1372-1382, August.
    6. Siamak Daneshvaran & Robert E. Morden, 2007. "Tornado risk analysis in the United States," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 97-111, March.
    7. Sarajcev, Petar & Vasilj, Josip & Goic, Ranko, 2013. "Monte Carlo analysis of wind farm surge arresters risk of failure due to lightning surges," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 626-634.
    8. Stephen M. Strader & Walker S. Ashley & Thomas J. Pingel & Andrew J. Krmenec, 2017. "Projected 21st century changes in tornado exposure, risk, and disaster potential," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 301-313, March.
    9. Siamak Daneshvaran & Robert E. Morden, 2007. "Tornado risk analysis in the United States," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 97-111, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Cheng & Yin, Weihao & Liu, Xueting & Huang, Yanwen & Lu, Dagang & Zhang, Jie, 2024. "Tornado-induced risk analysis of railway system considering the correlation of parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Xin & Zhang, Zhaolong & Shi, Xiaoqiang & Ju, Wenbin, 2014. "A review on wind power industry and corresponding insurance market in China: Current status and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1069-1082.
    2. Abolhosseini, Shahrouz & Heshmati, Almas & Altmann, Jörn, 2014. "A Review of Renewable Energy Supply and Energy Efficiency Technologies," IZA Discussion Papers 8145, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Ayman Al-Quraan & Bashar Al-Mhairat, 2022. "Intelligent Optimized Wind Turbine Cost Analysis for Different Wind Sites in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Velo, R. & Osorio, L. & Fernández, M.D. & Rodríguez, M.R., 2014. "An economic analysis of a stand-alone and grid-connected cattle farm," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 883-890.
    5. David Manske & Lukas Grosch & Julius Schmiedt & Nora Mittelstädt & Daniela Thrän, 2022. "Geo-Locations and System Data of Renewable Energy Installations in Germany," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Wen-Chun Lo & Ting-Chi Tsao & Chih-Hao Hsu, 2012. "Building vulnerability to debris flows in Taiwan: a preliminary study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(3), pages 2107-2128, December.
    7. Silva Herran, Diego & Dai, Hancheng & Fujimori, Shinichiro & Masui, Toshihiko, 2016. "Global assessment of onshore wind power resources considering the distance to urban areas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 75-86.
    8. Kabir, Md Ruhul & Rooke, Braden & Dassanayake, G.D. Malinga & Fleck, Brian A., 2012. "Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 133-141.
    9. Irene Clara Pisón Fernández & Félix Puime Guillén & Miguel Ángel Crespo Cibrán, 2015. "Desarrollo de un modelo de determinación de cash-flows para un proyecto de energía eólica," Economic Analysis Working Papers (2002-2010). Atlantic Review of Economics (2011-2016), Colexio de Economistas de A Coruña, Spain and Fundación Una Galicia Moderna, vol. 1, pages 1-1, June.
    10. Juliana Subtil Lacerda & Jeroen C. J. M. Van den Bergh, 2014. "International Diffusion of Renewable Energy Innovations: Lessons from the Lead Markets for Wind Power in China, Germany and USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-28, December.
    11. Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui & Wu, Guoqing, 2012. "The current state of offshore wind energy technology development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 298-312.
    12. Jose V. Taboada & Vicente Diaz-Casas & Xi Yu, 2021. "Reliability and Maintenance Management Analysis on OffShore Wind Turbines (OWTs)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Yang, Lin & Rojas, Jose I. & Montlaur, Adeline, 2020. "Advanced methodology for wind resource assessment near hydroelectric dams in complex mountainous areas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    14. Linnell, Peter, 2010. "Are Smaller Turbines the Way Forward for Wind Energy in Herefordshire?," MPRA Paper 58879, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. van der Zwaan, Bob & Cameron, Lachlan & Kober, Tom, 2013. "Potential for renewable energy jobs in the Middle East," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 296-304.
    16. Luis M. Abadie & Nestor Goicoechea, 2021. "Old Wind Farm Life Extension vs. Full Repowering: A Review of Economic Issues and a Stochastic Application for Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    17. Kaldellis, John K. & Zafirakis, D., 2011. "The wind energy (r)evolution: A short review of a long history," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1887-1901.
    18. Yeter, B. & Garbatov, Y. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "Risk-based maintenance planning of offshore wind turbine farms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    19. Ismail Kamdar & Shahid Ali & Juntakan Taweekun & Hafiz Muhammad Ali, 2021. "Wind Farm Site Selection Using WAsP Tool for Application in the Tropical Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Malcolm, Newman & Aggarwal, Raj K., 2015. "The impact of multiple lightning strokes on the energy absorbed by MOV surge arresters in wind farms during direct lightning strikes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1305-1314.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:116:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05843-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.