IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v115y2023i2d10.1007_s11069-022-05546-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of different forecasting tools for short-range lightning strike risk assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélie Bouchard

    (ONERA, Université Paris Saclay)

  • Magalie Buguet

    (ONERA, Université Paris Saclay)

  • Adrien Chan-Hon-Tong

    (ONERA, Université Paris Saclay)

  • Jean Dezert

    (ONERA, Université Paris Saclay)

  • Philippe Lalande

    (ONERA, Université Paris Saclay)

Abstract

Thunderstorms, the main generator of lightning on earth, are characterized by the presence of extreme atmospheric conditions (turbulence, hail, heavy rain, wind shear, etc.). Consequently, the atmospheric conditions associated with this kind of phenomenon (in particular the strike itself) can be dangerous for aviation. This study focuses on the estimation of the lightning strike risk induced by thunderstorms over the sea, in a short-range forecast, from 0 to 24 h. In this framework, three methods have been developed and compared. The first method is based on the use of thresholds and weighting functions; the second method is based on a neural network approach, and the third method is based on the use of belief functions. Each method has been applied to the same dataset comprising predictors defined from numerical weather prediction model outputs. In order to assess the different methods, a “ground truth” dataset based on lightning stroke locations supplied by the World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) has been used. The choice of one method over the others will depend on the compromise that the user is willing to accept between false alarms, missed detections, and runtimes. The first method has a very low missed detection rate but a high false alarm rate, while the other two methods have much lower false alarm rates, but at the cost of a non-negligible missed detection rate. Finally, the third method is much faster than the other two methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélie Bouchard & Magalie Buguet & Adrien Chan-Hon-Tong & Jean Dezert & Philippe Lalande, 2023. "Comparison of different forecasting tools for short-range lightning strike risk assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1011-1047, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:115:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05546-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05546-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-022-05546-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-022-05546-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suman Ravuri & Karel Lenc & Matthew Willson & Dmitry Kangin & Remi Lam & Piotr Mirowski & Megan Fitzsimons & Maria Athanassiadou & Sheleem Kashem & Sam Madge & Rachel Prudden & Amol Mandhane & Aidan C, 2021. "Skilful precipitation nowcasting using deep generative models of radar," Nature, Nature, vol. 597(7878), pages 672-677, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao-Yang Liu & Jingyang Rui & Jiechao Gao & Liuqing Yang & Hongyang Yang & Zhaoran Wang & Christina Dan Wang & Jian Guo, 2021. "FinRL-Meta: A Universe of Near-Real Market Environments for Data-Driven Deep Reinforcement Learning in Quantitative Finance," Papers 2112.06753, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    2. Olivares, Kin G. & Meetei, O. Nganba & Ma, Ruijun & Reddy, Rohan & Cao, Mengfei & Dicker, Lee, 2024. "Probabilistic hierarchical forecasting with deep Poisson mixtures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 470-489.
    3. Bai, Mingliang & Yao, Peng & Dong, Haiyu & Fang, Zuliang & Jin, Weixin & Xusheng Yang, & Liu, Jinfu & Yu, Daren, 2024. "Spatial-temporal characteristics analysis of solar irradiance forecast errors in Europe and North America," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
    4. Fenghua Ling & Jing-Jia Luo & Yue Li & Tao Tang & Lei Bai & Wanli Ouyang & Toshio Yamagata, 2022. "Multi-task machine learning improves multi-seasonal prediction of the Indian Ocean Dipole," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Fuping Liu & Ying Liu & Chen Yang & Ruixun Lai, 2022. "A New Precipitation Prediction Method Based on CEEMDAN-IWOA-BP Coupling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(12), pages 4785-4797, September.
    6. Pan Xia & Lu Zhang & Min Min & Jun Li & Yun Wang & Yu Yu & Shengjie Jia, 2024. "Accurate nowcasting of cloud cover at solar photovoltaic plants using geostationary satellite images," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Chu, Yinghao & Wang, Yiling & Yang, Dazhi & Chen, Shanlin & Li, Mengying, 2024. "A review of distributed solar forecasting with remote sensing and deep learning," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Xueliang Zhao & Qilong Sun & Xiaoguang Lin, 2023. "Physical Attention-Gated Spatial-Temporal Predictive Network for Weather Forecasting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, March.
    9. Marino Marrocu & Luca Massidda, 2022. "Coupling a Neural Network with a Spatial Downscaling Procedure to Improve Probabilistic Nowcast for Urban Rain Radars," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:115:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11069-022-05546-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.