IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v106y2021i3d10.1007_s11069-021-04527-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Content analyses of the international federation of red cross and red crescent societies (ifrc) based on machine learning techniques through twitter

Author

Listed:
  • Türkay Dereli

    (Hasan Kalyoncu University)

  • Nazmiye Eligüzel

    (Gaziantep University)

  • Cihan Çetinkaya

    (Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University)

Abstract

Intensity of natural disasters has substantially increased; disaster management has gained importance along with this reason. In addition, social media has become an integral part of disaster management. Before, during and after disasters; people use social media and large number of output is obtained through social media activities. In this regard, Twitter is the most popular social media tool as micro blogging. Twitter has also become significant in complex disaster environment for coordinating events. It provides a swift way to collect crowd-sourced information. So, how do humanitarian organizations use Twitter platform? Humanitarian organizations utilize resources and related information while managing disasters. The effective use of social media by humanitarian agencies causes increased peoples’ awareness. The international federation of red cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) is the most significant humanitarian organization that aims providing assistance to people. Thus, the aim of this paper is to analyze IFRC’s activities on Twitter and propose a perspective in the light of theoretical framework. Approximately, 5201 tweets are passed the pre-processing level, some important topics are extracted utilizing word labeling, latent dirichlet allocation (LDA model) and bag of Ngram model and sentiment analysis is applied based on machine learning classification algorithms including Naïve Bayes, support vector machine SVM), decision tree, random forest, neural network and k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifications. According to the classification accuracies, results demonstrate the superiority of support vector machine among other classification algorithms. This study shows us how IFRC uses Twitter and which topics IFRC emphasizes more.

Suggested Citation

  • Türkay Dereli & Nazmiye Eligüzel & Cihan Çetinkaya, 2021. "Content analyses of the international federation of red cross and red crescent societies (ifrc) based on machine learning techniques through twitter," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 2025-2045, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:106:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04527-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04527-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-021-04527-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-021-04527-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Xiao & Beiqun Li & Zaiwu Gong, 2018. "Real-time identification of urban rainstorm waterlogging disasters based on Weibo big data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(2), pages 833-842, November.
    2. Bairong Wang & Jun Zhuang, 2017. "Crisis information distribution on Twitter: a content analysis of tweets during Hurricane Sandy," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(1), pages 161-181, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bairong Wang & Jun Zhuang, 2018. "Rumor response, debunking response, and decision makings of misinformed Twitter users during disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1145-1162, September.
    2. Alekh Gour & Shikha Aggarwal & Subodha Kumar, 2022. "Lending ears to unheard voices: An empirical analysis of user‐generated content on social media," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2457-2476, June.
    3. Sarah Gardiner & Jinyan Chen & Margarida Abreu Novais & Karine Dupré & J. Guy Castley, 2023. "Analyzing and Leveraging Social Media Disaster Communication of Natural Hazards: Community Sentiment and Messaging Regarding the Australian 2019/20 Bushfires," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Yuye Zhou & Jiangang Xu & Maosen Yin & Jun Zeng & Haolin Ming & Yiwen Wang, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Pattern Evolution of Public Sentiment Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Small Cities of China: A Case Study Based on Social Media Data Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Jiang, Meiling & Gao, Qingwu & Zhuang, Jun, 2021. "Reciprocal spreading and debunking processes of online misinformation: A new rumor spreading–debunking model with a case study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 565(C).
    6. Jingyi Gao & Osamu Murao & Xuanda Pei & Yitong Dong, 2022. "Identifying Evacuation Needs and Resources Based on Volunteered Geographic Information: A Case of the Rainstorm in July 2021, Zhengzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Wu, Chunying & Xiong, Xiong & Gao, Ya & Zhang, Jin, 2022. "Does social media distort price discovery? Evidence from rumor clarifications," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    8. Cen Song & Sijia Zhou & Kyle Hunt & Jun Zhuang, 2022. "Comprehensive Evolution Analysis of Public Perceptions Related to Pediatric Care: A Sina Weibo Case Study (2013–2020)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    9. Bairong Wang & Bin Liu & Qi Zhang, 2021. "An empirical study on Twitter’s use and crisis retweeting dynamics amid Covid-19," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(3), pages 2319-2336, July.
    10. Paul M. Johnson & Corey E. Brady & Craig Philip & Hiba Baroud & Janey V. Camp & Mark Abkowitz, 2020. "A Factor Analysis Approach Toward Reconciling Community Vulnerability and Resilience Indices for Natural Hazards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(9), pages 1795-1810, September.
    11. Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy & Amir Karami & Courtney Monroe & Heather M. Brandt, 2020. "Dietary pattern recognition on Twitter: a case example of before, during, and after four natural disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1035-1049, August.
    12. Carine Dominguez-Péry & Rana Tassabehji & Lakshmi Narasimha Raju Vuddaraju & Vikhram Kofi Duffour, 2021. "Improving emergency response operations in maritime accidents using social media with big data analytics: a case study of the MV Wakashio disaster," Post-Print hal-04021179, HAL.
    13. Mo Wang & Xiaoping Fu & Dongqing Zhang & Furong Chen & Jin Su & Shiqi Zhou & Jianjun Li & Yongming Zhong & Soon Keat Tan, 2023. "Urban Flooding Risk Assessment in the Rural-Urban Fringe Based on a Bayesian Classifier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Jing Huang & Jinle Kang & Huimin Wang & Zhiqiang Wang & Tian Qiu, 2020. "A Novel Approach to Measuring Urban Waterlogging Depth from Images Based on Mask Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    15. Mingyun Gu & Haixiang Guo & Jun Zhuang & Yufei Du & Lijin Qian, 2022. "Social Media User Behavior and Emotions during Crisis Events," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    16. Qifeng Wan & Xuanhua Xu & Xiaohong Chen & Jun Zhuang, 2020. "A Two-Stage Optimization Model for Large-Scale Group Decision-Making in Disaster Management: Minimizing Group Conflict and Maximizing Individual Satisfaction," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 901-921, October.
    17. Wang, Xiaoxi & Zhang, Yaojun & Yu, Danlin & Qi, Jinghan & Li, Shujing, 2022. "Investigating the spatiotemporal pattern of urban vibrancy and its determinants: Spatial big data analyses in Beijing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Gaoshan Wang & Guangjin Yu & Xiaohong Shen, 2020. "The Effect of Online Investor Sentiment on Stock Movements: An LSTM Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-11, December.
    19. Seungil Yum, 2023. "Analyses of human responses to Winter storm Kai using the GWR model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(2), pages 1805-1821, March.
    20. Cole Vaughn & Kathleen Sherman-Morris & Philip Poe, 2023. "Factors influencing retweeting of local news media tweets during Hurricane Irma," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 119(1), pages 583-611, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:106:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-021-04527-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.