IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v103y2020i1d10.1007_s11069-020-04026-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An automated approach for determination and prioritization of urban potential risk areas within the scope of superstructure

Author

Listed:
  • Ersin Aksoy

    (Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Urbanization)

  • Serdar Selim

    (Akdeniz University)

Abstract

In the face of natural disasters, it is important to determine the potential risk areas in a fast and high accuracy and to take necessary precaution in urban areas. In this study, the potential risk areas according to the existing legislation are determined and prioritized by using geographic information systems and multi-criteria decision-making analysis. The main aim is to develop an automatic approach for assessing quickly the risk status of superstructure. This study was carried out in the south Mediterranean coast of Turkey in Antalya, which is the fifth largest city in terms of population. The rapid population growth and uncontrolled urbanization were effective in the selection of this region. In addition, the areas where the developed method is applied are dense in terms of slum and non-regulatory structures. As a result, 8.49 ha of the application area was detected to be high risky, 1.22 ha was risky, 9.51 ha was low risky, and 6.24 ha was minimum risk. Hence, the ratio of the areas in the very risky class to the total area is 33%, the ratio of the area in the risky class is 4%, the ratio of the area in the low risk class is 38%, and the rate of the area that appears to be the minimum risk is 25%. In this context, risk classes were mapped and priority intervention areas were determined. This study proposes and applies a method that will help and guide the related management and implementation level, especially urban and regional planners in urban settlements, in determining the potential risk areas due to superstructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Ersin Aksoy & Serdar Selim, 2020. "An automated approach for determination and prioritization of urban potential risk areas within the scope of superstructure," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1077-1091, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04026-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04026-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-04026-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-04026-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A. & Fra.Paleo, Urbano, 2016. "Lost in participation: How local knowledge was overlooked in land use planning and risk governance in Tōhoku, Japan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 543-551.
    2. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    3. Bedini, Maria Angela & Bronzini, Fabio, 2018. "The post-earthquake experience in Italy. Difficulties and the possibility of planning the resurgence of the territories affected by earthquakes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 303-315.
    4. Penjani Hopkins Nyimbili & Turan Erden & Himmet Karaman, 2018. "Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1523-1546, July.
    5. Ernest H. Forman & Saul I. Gass, 2001. "The Analytic Hierarchy Process---An Exposition," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 469-486, August.
    6. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    7. Dorina Pojani & Dominic Stead, 2015. "Sustainable Urban Transport in the Developing World: Beyond Megacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Höfer, Tim & Sunak, Yasin & Siddique, Hafiz & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Wind farm siting using a spatial Analytic Hierarchy Process approach: A case study of the Städteregion Aachen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 222-243.
    3. James Dolan, 2010. "Multi-Criteria Clinical Decision Support," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 3(4), pages 229-248, December.
    4. Sarah Ben Amor & Fateh Belaid & Ramzi Benkraiem & Boumediene Ramdani & Khaled Guesmi, 2023. "Multi-criteria classification, sorting, and clustering: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 771-793, June.
    5. Nyimbili, Penjani Hopkins & Erden, Turan, 2020. "GIS-based fuzzy multi-criteria approach for optimal site selection of fire stations in Istanbul, Turkey," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    6. Syamsari Syamsari & Muhammad Ramaditya & Irma Andriani & Ayu Puspitasari, 2022. "Selecting Priority Policy Strategies for Sustainability of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Takalar Regency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-12, November.
    7. Arsalan Raza & Muhammad Umair Ali & Ubaid Ullah & Muhammad Fayaz & Muhammad Junaid Alvi & Karam Dad Kallu & Amad Zafar & Sarvar Hussain Nengroo, 2022. "Evaluation of a Sustainable Urban Transportation System in Terms of Traffic Congestion—A Case Study in Taxila, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Regina Negri Pagani & João Luiz Kovaleski & Luis Mauricio Resende, 2015. "Methodi Ordinatio: a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific papers encompassing the impact factor, number of citation, and year of publication," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2109-2135, December.
    9. Ouesleti, Bilel & Costa-Font, Montserrat & Kallas, Zein & Chema Gil, Jose Maria, 2015. "Determinant Factors Affecting The Point of Purchase Selection: valuation and Perceptions," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212603, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Nuria Toledano & Ana Gessa & Reyes Sanchez-Herrera, 2022. "Rethinking the Resources and Responsibilities of University Spin-Offs: Critical Factors in Times of Global Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Balci, Mehmet & Kumral, Mustafa, 2022. "Building an innovation strategy and culture on the structural characteristics of the mining industries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    12. Vivek Sharma & Sandeep Grover & S. K. Sharma, 2020. "An integrated AHP-GTA approach for measuring effectiveness of quality tools and techniques," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 54-63, February.
    13. Knoeri, Christof & Binder, Claudia R. & Althaus, Hans-Joerg, 2011. "Decisions on recycling: Construction stakeholders’ decisions regarding recycled mineral construction materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 1039-1050.
    14. Ergu, Daji & Kou, Gang & Peng, Yi & Shi, Yong, 2011. "A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 246-259, August.
    15. Thi Dieu Linh Nguyen & Brent Bleys, 2021. "Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process to Adaptation to Saltwater Intrusion in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Sobhani, Md. Golam & Imtiyaz, Md. Nafis & Azam, Md. Shafiul & Hossain, Moinul, 2020. "A framework for analyzing the competitiveness of unconventional modes of transportation in developing cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 504-518.
    17. Hussain, Shahid & Xuetong, Wang & Hussain, Talib & Khoja, Asif Hussain & Zia, Muhammad Zaeem, 2021. "Assessing the impact of COVID-19 and safety parameters on energy project performance with an analytical hierarchy process," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Kevin Kam Fung Yuen, 2014. "The Least Penalty Optimization Prioritization Operators for the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Revised Case of Medical Decision Problem of Organ Transplantation," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 442-461, December.
    19. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Gupta, Pankaj & Mittal, Garima & Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar, 2013. "Expected value multiobjective portfolio rebalancing model with fuzzy parameters," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 190-203.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-04026-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.