IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v137y2020icp504-518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for analyzing the competitiveness of unconventional modes of transportation in developing cities

Author

Listed:
  • Sobhani, Md. Golam
  • Imtiyaz, Md. Nafis
  • Azam, Md. Shafiul
  • Hossain, Moinul

Abstract

Unconventional modes of transport (UCMs) play a substantial role in many developing cities in meeting the mobility demand in spite of having negative image in the eyes of the authorities. This manuscript outlines a conjoint framework where various factors affecting sustainability and competitiveness of UCMs are identified through observation study and organized using PESTLE qualitative framework. Afterwards, it presents an AHP-TOPSIS based qualitative approach where inputs from experts as well as major stakeholders (owners/operators, drivers, conductors and passengers) are combined based on the PESTLE framework to fathom the competitiveness of UCMs. Along this process, the manuscript also unveils the business model of UCMs along with their area of operation, advantages and weaknesses. For this, the study uses Dhaka, the capital city of Bangladesh as study area and selects three popular UCMs – locally known as Rickshaw, Easy bike and Leguna. The findings suggest that economic, social and political factors respectively have the highest influence among all factors of PESTLE. Rickshaw was found to be the most competitive followed by Easy bike and Leguna. The study is expected to shed light into the perception and expectation of major stakeholders of UCMs which in turn will provide valuable insight for designing conventional public transport services, and/or, help in slowly integrating the UCMs into the mainstream transportation service through addressing their shortcomings.

Suggested Citation

  • Sobhani, Md. Golam & Imtiyaz, Md. Nafis & Azam, Md. Shafiul & Hossain, Moinul, 2020. "A framework for analyzing the competitiveness of unconventional modes of transportation in developing cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 504-518.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:137:y:2020:i:c:p:504-518
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.02.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856417311618
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2019.02.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guillen, Marie Danielle & Ishida, Haruo & Okamoto, Naohisa, 2013. "Is the use of informal public transport modes in developing countries habitual? An empirical study in Davao City, Philippines," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 31-42.
    2. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    3. Godard, Xavier, 2013. "Comparisons of urban transport sustainability: Lessons from West and North Africa," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 96-103.
    4. Tri Joewono & Hisashi Kubota, 2007. "User satisfaction with paratransit in competition with motorization in indonesia: anticipation of future implications," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 337-354, May.
    5. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    6. Schalekamp, Herrie & Behrens, Roger, 2010. "Engaging paratransit on public transport reform initiatives in South Africa: A critique of policy and an investigation of appropriate engagement approaches," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 371-378.
    7. Cheng-Min Feng & Rong-Tsu Wang, 2001. "Considering the financial ratios on the performance evaluation of highway bus industry," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 449-467, January.
    8. Kumarage, Amal S. & Bandara, Mahinda & Munasinghe, Darshini, 2010. "Analysis of the economic and social parameters of the Three-Wheeler Taxi service in Sri Lanka," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 395-400.
    9. Ahmed, Qureshi Intikhab & Lu, Huapu & Ye, Shi, 2008. "Urban transportation and equity: A case study of Beijing and Karachi," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 125-139, January.
    10. Dorina Pojani & Dominic Stead, 2015. "Sustainable Urban Transport in the Developing World: Beyond Megacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Cervero, Robert & Golub, Aaron, 2007. "Informal transport: A global perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 445-457, November.
    12. Harding, Simon & Kandlikar, Milind, 2017. "Explaining the rapid emergence of battery-rickshaws in New Delhi: Supply-demand, regulation and political mobilisation," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7, pages 22-27.
    13. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Solomon, Anthony & Wishart, Nicole & Dublish, Sandipa, 1998. "Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 507-529, June.
    14. Cohen, Barney, 2006. "Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 63-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bansal, Prateek & Gadepalli, Ravi & AitBihiOuali, Laila, 2023. "Eliciting mobility preferences of Indians for E-rickshaws: Evidence from Gurugram," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-30.
    2. Thembani Moyo & Alain Y Kibangou & Walter Musakwa, 2021. "Societal context-dependent multi-modal transportation network augmentation in Johannesburg, South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Arsalan Raza & Muhammad Umair Ali & Ubaid Ullah & Muhammad Fayaz & Muhammad Junaid Alvi & Karam Dad Kallu & Amad Zafar & Sarvar Hussain Nengroo, 2022. "Evaluation of a Sustainable Urban Transportation System in Terms of Traffic Congestion—A Case Study in Taxila, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Song, Zhao-Yu & Lin, Cheng-Wei & Feng, Xuehao & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2024. "An empirical study of the performance of the sixth generation ports model with smart ports with reference to major container ports in mainland China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tiglao, Noriel Christopher C. & De Veyra, Janna M. & Tolentino, Niki Jon Y. & Tacderas, Mark Angelo Y., 2020. "The perception of service quality among paratransit users in Metro Manila using structural equations modelling (SEM) approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Kemajou, Armel & Jaligot, Rémi & Bosch, Martí & Chenal, Jérôme, 2019. "Assessing motorcycle taxi activity in Cameroon using GPS devices," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    3. Kar, Manaswinee & Sadhukhan, Shubhajit & Parida, Manoranjan, 2022. "Assessing commuters’ perceptions towards improvement of intermediate public transport as access modes to metro stations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 140-155.
    4. Mateo-Babiano, Iderlina & Recio, Redento B. & Ashmore, David P. & Guillen, Marie Danielle & Gaspay, Sandy Mae, 2020. "Formalising the jeepney industry in the Philippines – A confirmatory thematic analysis of key transitionary issues," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Roca, Santiago & Simabuko, Luis, 2020. "Understanding informality in the intercity passenger ground transport market: A stylized model and policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 375-384.
    6. Mulliner, Emma & Smallbone, Kieran & Maliene, Vida, 2013. "An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 270-279.
    7. Deyas, Gebeyew T. & Woldeamanuel, Mintesnot G., 2020. "Social and economic impacts of public transportation on adjacent communities: The case of the Addis Ababa light rail transit," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Karatas, Mumtaz & Sulukan, Egemen & Karacan, Ilknur, 2018. "Assessment of Turkey's energy management performance via a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 890-912.
    9. Bottani, Eleonora & Rizzi, Antonio, 2008. "An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection--An application oriented to lead-time reduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 763-781, February.
    10. Alaa Alden Al Mohamed & Sobhi Al Mohamed & Moustafa Zino, 2023. "Application of fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model in selecting pandemic hospital site," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Kerzhner, Tamara, 2022. "Formalization of East Jerusalem public transport: Mobility, politics and planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    12. Mumtaz Karatas, 2017. "Multiattribute Decision Making Using Multiperiod Probabilistic Weighted Fuzzy Axiomatic Design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 318-334, July.
    13. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. du Preez, Dirk & Zuidgeest, Mark & Behrens, Roger, 2019. "A quantitative clustering analysis of paratransit route typology and operating attributes in Cape Town," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. Wojciech Keblowski & Frédéric Dobruszkes & Kobe Boussauw, 2022. "Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/341191, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    16. Roszkowska Ewa & Wachowicz Tomasz, 2019. "The Impact of Decision-Making Profiles on the Consistency of Rankings Obtained by Means of Selected Multiple Criteria Decision-Aiding Methods," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 23(2), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Fernando García & Francisco Guijarro & Ismael Moya, 2013. "Monitoring credit risk in the social economy sector by means of a binary goal programming model," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(3), pages 483-495, September.
    18. Mukund Pratap Singh & Pitam Singh & Priyamvada Singh, 2019. "Fuzzy AHP-based multi-criteria decision-making analysis for route alignment planning using geographic information system (GIS)," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 395-432, September.
    19. Thomas L. Saaty & Daji Ergu, 2015. "When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1171-1187, November.
    20. Daniel R. Georgiadis & Thomas A. Mazzuchi & Shahram Sarkani, 2013. "Using multi criteria decision making in analysis of alternatives for selection of enabling technology," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 287-303, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    UCM; PESTLE; TOPSIS; AHP; Competitiveness;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:137:y:2020:i:c:p:504-518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.