IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v103y2020i1d10.1007_s11069-020-03999-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CEDLES: a framework for plugin-based applications for earthquake risk prediction and loss assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Li Long

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology)

  • Shansuo Zheng

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology)

  • Yixin Zhang

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology)

  • Longfei Sun

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology
    Country Garden Company)

  • Yan Zhou

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology)

  • Liguo Dong

    (Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology)

Abstract

To evaluate the seismic risk and loss caused by an earthquake, many earthquake disaster loss assessment softwares have been developed. However, it is difficult to apply one earthquake disaster loss assessment software for all countries due to the different characteristics of seismic, architectural and economic of various countries. China is one of the high-seismicity regions in the world. Thus, it is imperative to develop an earthquake disaster loss assessment software suitable for China. In this paper, a novel framework for plugin-based applications named CEDLES is designed considering the scalability of the software. The features provided by CEDLES to ease the development of extensible applications are described. This framework includes a startup project, a common plugin framework base, a geographic information system plugin framework base, and a plugin manager project. These utilities allow rapid development and integration in which robustness and quality play a fundamental role. A first prototype, Earthquake Risk Prediction and Loss Assessment System (ERPLAS) is designed and implemented. It integrates the plugins of seismic hazard analysis, structural damage analysis, loss assessment, earthquake insurance rate estimation, and benefit–cost analysis of building retrofit, especially for China. ERPLAS is applied to Baqiao District in Xi’an and the estimation results are displayed and debated, which verify the practicality of ERPLAS and the feasibility and facility of CEDLES framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Long & Shansuo Zheng & Yixin Zhang & Longfei Sun & Yan Zhou & Liguo Dong, 2020. "CEDLES: a framework for plugin-based applications for earthquake risk prediction and loss assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 531-556, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-03999-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-03999-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-03999-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-03999-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chin-Hsun Yeh & Chin-Hsiung Loh & Keh-Chyuan Tsai, 2006. "Overview of Taiwan Earthquake Loss Estimation System," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 37(1), pages 23-37, February.
    2. M. Yucemen, 2005. "Probabilistic Assessment of Earthquake Insurance Rates for Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 35(2), pages 291-313, June.
    3. Andreas Kappos & E. Dimitrakopoulos, 2008. "Feasibility of pre-earthquake strengthening of buildings based on cost-benefit and life-cycle cost analysis, with the aid of fragility curves," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 45(1), pages 33-54, April.
    4. Jairo Valcárcel & Miguel Mora & Omar Cardona & Lluis Pujades & Alex Barbat & Gabriel Bernal, 2013. "Methodology and applications for the benefit cost analysis of the seismic risk reduction in building portfolios at broadscale," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 845-868, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wulan Anggraeni & Sudradjat Supian & Sukono & Nurfadhlina Binti Abdul Halim, 2022. "Earthquake Catastrophe Bond Pricing Using Extreme Value Theory: A Mini-Review Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Liu, Xiaohang & Zheng, Shansuo & Wu, Xinxia & Chen, Dianxin & He, Jinchuan, 2021. "Research on a seismic connectivity reliability model of power systems based on the quasi-Monte Carlo method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. Başbuğ & Henry Wynn, 2006. "Patterns in the Turkish reinsurance claim data, 1998–2002: An application of the extreme value theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 39(2), pages 329-342, October.
    2. Hung-Chih Hung & Ming-Chin Ho & Yi-Jie Chen & Chang-Yi Chian & Su-Ying Chen, 2013. "Integrating long-term seismic risk changes into improving emergency response and land-use planning: a case study for the Hsinchu City, Taiwan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 491-508, October.
    3. Rehan Asad & Muhammad Qaiser Saleem & Muhammad Salman Habib & Nadeem Ahmad Mufti & Shaker Mahmood Mayo, 2023. "Seismic risk assessment and hotspots prioritization: a developing country perspective," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2863-2901, July.
    4. Min-Yuan Cheng & Yu-Wei Wu, 2013. "Multi-agent-based data exchange platform for bridge disaster prevention: a case study in Taiwan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 311-326, October.
    5. Athanasios Gkimprixis & John Douglas & Enrico Tubaldi, 2021. "Seismic risk management through insurance and its sensitivity to uncertainty in the hazard model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1629-1657, September.
    6. Zhifei Deng & Jifu Liu & Lanlan Guo & Jiaoyang Li & Junming Li & Yiru Jia, 2021. "Pure risk premium rating of debris flows based on a dynamic run-out model: a case study in Anzhou, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 235-253, March.
    7. Morshedi, Mohamad Ali & Kashani, Hamed, 2022. "Assessment of vulnerability reduction policies: Integration of economic and cognitive models of decision-making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Maria Polese & Marco Gaetani d’Aragona & Marco Di Ludovico & Andrea Prota, 2018. "Sustainable Selective Mitigation Interventions towards Effective Earthquake Risk Reduction at the Community Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Hooman Motamed & Bijan Khazai & Mohsen Ghafory-Ashtiany & Kambod Amini-Hosseini, 2014. "An automated model for optimizing budget allocation in earthquake mitigation scenarios," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 51-68, January.
    10. Harsh K. Mistry & Domenico Lombardi, 2023. "A stochastic exposure model for seismic risk assessment and pricing of catastrophe bonds," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 803-829, May.
    11. Ali Sabbaghzade Feriz & Hesam Varaee & Mohammad Reza Ghasemi, 2024. "Multi-Objective Optimization in Support of Life-Cycle Cost-Performance-Based Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-26, June.
    12. Mitropoulou, Chara Ch. & Lagaros, Nikos D. & Papadrakakis, Manolis, 2011. "Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1311-1331.
    13. Jairo Valcárcel & Miguel Mora & Omar Cardona & Lluis Pujades & Alex Barbat & Gabriel Bernal, 2013. "Methodology and applications for the benefit cost analysis of the seismic risk reduction in building portfolios at broadscale," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 845-868, October.
    14. Kalfin & Sukono & Sudradjat Supian & Mustafa Mamat, 2022. "Insurance as an Alternative for Sustainable Economic Recovery after Natural Disasters: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Michael C. Haung & Nobuhiro Hosoe, 2016. "Computable General Equilibrium Assessment Of A Compound Disaster In Northern Taiwan," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 89-106, July.
    16. Kun-Sung Liu & Yi-Ben Tsai & Kuei-Pao Chen, 2013. "Estimation of seismic hazard potential in Taiwan based on ShakeMaps," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(3), pages 2233-2262, December.
    17. You-Xuan Lin & Chi-Hao Lin & Chih-Hao Lin, 2021. "A challenge for healthcare system resilience after an earthquake: The crowdedness of a first-aid hospital by non-urgent patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Wilson, Bradley, 2020. "Evaluating the INLA-SPDE approach for Bayesian modeling of earthquake damages from geolocated cluster data," Earth Arxiv 64whm, Center for Open Science.
    19. Barış Ünal & Ayşegül Askan & A. Sevtap Selcuk-Kestel, 2017. "Simulation of large earthquakes and its implications on earthquake insurance rates: a case study in Bursa region (Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(1), pages 215-236, January.
    20. Ismaël Riedel & Philippe Guéguen, 2018. "Modeling of damage-related earthquake losses in a moderate seismic-prone country and cost–benefit evaluation of retrofit investments: application to France," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(2), pages 639-662, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-03999-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.