IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v96y2011i10p1311-1331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions

Author

Listed:
  • Mitropoulou, Chara Ch.
  • Lagaros, Nikos D.
  • Papadrakakis, Manolis

Abstract

Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is an assessment tool for studying the performance of systems in many fields of engineering. In earthquake engineering LCCA demands the calculation of the cost components that are related to the performance of the structure in multiple earthquake hazard levels. Incremental static and dynamic analyses are two procedures that can be used for estimating the seismic capacity of a structural system and can therefore be incorporated into the LCCA methodology. In this work the effect of the analysis procedure, the number of seismic records imposed, the performance criterion used and the structural type (regular or irregular) is investigated, on the life-cycle cost analysis of 3D reinforced concrete structures. Furthermore, the influence of uncertainties on the seismic response of structural systems and their impact on LCCA is examined. The uncertainty on the material properties, the cross-section dimensions and the record-incident angle is taking into account with the incorporation of the Latin hypercube sampling method into the incremental dynamic analysis procedure. In addition, the LCCA methodology is used as an assessment tool for the designs obtained by means of prescriptive and performance-based optimum design methodologies. The first one is obtained from a single-objective optimization problem, where the initial construction cost was the objective to be minimized, while the second one as a two-objective optimization problem where the life-cycle cost was the additional objective also to be minimized.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitropoulou, Chara Ch. & Lagaros, Nikos D. & Papadrakakis, Manolis, 2011. "Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1311-1331.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:10:p:1311-1331
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832011000962
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2011.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Seung-Ie & Frangopol, Dan M. & Kawakami, Yoriko & Neves, Luís C., 2006. "The use of lifetime functions in the optimization of interventions on existing bridges considering maintenance and failure costs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(6), pages 698-705.
    2. Rackwitz, Rüdiger, 2006. "The effect of discounting, different mortality reduction schemes and predictive cohort life tables on risk acceptability criteria," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 469-484.
    3. Andreas Kappos & E. Dimitrakopoulos, 2008. "Feasibility of pre-earthquake strengthening of buildings based on cost-benefit and life-cycle cost analysis, with the aid of fragility curves," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 45(1), pages 33-54, April.
    4. Joanni, A. & Rackwitz, R., 2008. "Cost–benefit optimization for maintained structures by a renewal model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(3), pages 489-499.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheng, Minghui & Frangopol, Dan M., 2022. "Life-cycle optimization of structural systems based on cumulative prospect theory: Effects of the reference point and risk attitudes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    2. Fadel Miguel, Leandro F. & Beck, André T., 2024. "Optimal path shape of friction-based Track-Nonlinear Energy Sinks to minimize lifecycle costs of buildings subjected to ground accelerations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    3. Ali Sabbaghzade Feriz & Hesam Varaee & Mohammad Reza Ghasemi, 2024. "Multi-Objective Optimization in Support of Life-Cycle Cost-Performance-Based Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Okasha, Nader M. & Frangopol, Dan M., 2010. "Redundancy of structural systems with and without maintenance: An approach based on lifetime functions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(5), pages 520-533.
    2. Gomes, Wellison J.S. & Beck, André T. & Haukaas, Terje, 2013. "Optimal inspection planning for onshore pipelines subject to external corrosion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 18-27.
    3. Athanasios Gkimprixis & John Douglas & Enrico Tubaldi, 2021. "Seismic risk management through insurance and its sensitivity to uncertainty in the hazard model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1629-1657, September.
    4. Kroetz, H.M. & Moustapha, M. & Beck, A.T. & Sudret, B., 2020. "A Two-Level Kriging-Based Approach with Active Learning for Solving Time-Variant Risk Optimization Problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    5. Morshedi, Mohamad Ali & Kashani, Hamed, 2022. "Assessment of vulnerability reduction policies: Integration of economic and cognitive models of decision-making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Lagaros, Nikos D. & Karlaftis, Matthew G. & Paida, Maria K., 2015. "Stochastic life-cycle cost analysis of wind parks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 117-127.
    7. Maria Polese & Marco Gaetani d’Aragona & Marco Di Ludovico & Andrea Prota, 2018. "Sustainable Selective Mitigation Interventions towards Effective Earthquake Risk Reduction at the Community Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Hooman Motamed & Bijan Khazai & Mohsen Ghafory-Ashtiany & Kambod Amini-Hosseini, 2014. "An automated model for optimizing budget allocation in earthquake mitigation scenarios," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 51-68, January.
    9. Ali Sabbaghzade Feriz & Hesam Varaee & Mohammad Reza Ghasemi, 2024. "Multi-Objective Optimization in Support of Life-Cycle Cost-Performance-Based Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-26, June.
    10. Jairo Valcárcel & Miguel Mora & Omar Cardona & Lluis Pujades & Alex Barbat & Gabriel Bernal, 2013. "Methodology and applications for the benefit cost analysis of the seismic risk reduction in building portfolios at broadscale," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 845-868, October.
    11. Maria Bostenaru Dan, 2018. "Decision Making Based on Benefit-Costs Analysis: Costs of Preventive Retrofit versus Costs of Repair after Earthquake Hazards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    12. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Le, Thanh-Son, 2011. "Reliability-based performance simulation for optimized pavement maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1402-1410.
    13. Schjølberg, Ingrid & Østdahl, Anne B., 2008. "Security and tolerable risk for hydrogen service stations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 64-70.
    14. Carlon, André Gustavo & Kroetz, Henrique Machado & Torii, André Jacomel & Lopez, Rafael Holdorf & Miguel, Leandro Fleck Fadel, 2022. "Risk optimization using the Chernoff bound and stochastic gradient descent," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Huaizhi Su & Jiang Hu & Men Yang & Zhiping Wen, 2015. "Assessment and prediction for service life of water resources and hydropower engineering," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(3), pages 3005-3019, February.
    16. Okasha, Nader M. & Frangopol, Dan M. & Orcesi, André D., 2012. "Automated finite element updating using strain data for the lifetime reliability assessment of bridges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 139-150.
    17. Li Long & Shansuo Zheng & Yixin Zhang & Longfei Sun & Yan Zhou & Liguo Dong, 2020. "CEDLES: a framework for plugin-based applications for earthquake risk prediction and loss assessment," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 531-556, August.
    18. Christoph M. Rheinberger & Michael Bründl & Jakob Rhyner, 2009. "Dealing with the White Death: Avalanche Risk Management for Traffic Routes," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 76-94, January.
    19. Pantea Vaziri & Rachel Davidson & Linda Nozick & Mahmood Hosseini, 2010. "Resource allocation for regional earthquake risk mitigation: a case study of Tehran, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 53(3), pages 527-546, June.
    20. Paolo La Greca & Giuseppe Margani, 2018. "Seismic and Energy Renovation Measures for Sustainable Cities: A Critical Analysis of the Italian Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:10:p:1311-1331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.