IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v85y2017i1d10.1007_s11069-016-2578-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of large earthquakes and its implications on earthquake insurance rates: a case study in Bursa region (Turkey)

Author

Listed:
  • Barış Ünal

    (Middle East Technical University)

  • Ayşegül Askan

    (Middle East Technical University)

  • A. Sevtap Selcuk-Kestel

    (Middle East Technical University)

Abstract

Ground motion intensity parameters of past and potential earthquakes are required for a range of purposes including earthquake insurance practice. In regions with no or sparse earthquake recordings, most of the available methods generate only peak ground motion parameters. For cases where full ground motion time histories are required, simulations that consider fault rupture processes become necessary. In this study, a major novel use of simulated ground motions is presented in insurance premium calculations which also require ground motion intensity measures that are not always available through observations. For this purpose, potential earthquakes in Bursa are simulated using stochastic finite-fault simulation method with dynamic corner frequency model. To ensure simulations with reliable synthetic ground motions, input parameters are derived from regional data. Regional model parameters are verified by comparisons against the observations as well as ground motion prediction equations. Next, a potential large magnitude event in Bursa is simulated. Distribution of peak ground motion parameters and time histories at selected locations are obtained. From these parameters, the corresponding Modified Mercalli Intensities (MMI) are estimated. Later, these MMIs are used as the main ground motion parameter in damage probability matrices (DPM). Return period of the scenario earthquake is obtained from the previous regional seismic hazard studies. Finally, insurance rates for Bursa region are determined with implementation of two new approaches in the literature. The probability of the scenario event and the expected mean damage ratios (MDR) from the corresponding DPMs are used, and the results are compared to Turkish Catastrophe Insurance Pool (TCIP) rates. Results show that insurance premiums can be effectively computed using simulated ground motions in the absence of real data.

Suggested Citation

  • Barış Ünal & Ayşegül Askan & A. Sevtap Selcuk-Kestel, 2017. "Simulation of large earthquakes and its implications on earthquake insurance rates: a case study in Bursa region (Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(1), pages 215-236, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:85:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2578-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2578-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2578-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-016-2578-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Yucemen, 2005. "Probabilistic Assessment of Earthquake Insurance Rates for Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 35(2), pages 291-313, June.
    2. Rob Kaas & Marc Goovaerts & Jan Dhaene & Michel Denuit, 2008. "Modern Actuarial Risk Theory," Springer Books, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-540-70998-5, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fatma Yerlikaya-Özkurt & Aysegul Askan, 2020. "Prediction of potential seismic damage using classification and regression trees: a case study on earthquake damage databases from Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 3163-3180, September.
    2. Tamara Lukić & Jelena Dunjić & Bojan Đerčan & Ivana Penjišević & Saša Milosavljević & Milka Bubalo-Živković & Milica Solarević, 2018. "Local Resilience to Natural Hazards in Serbia. Case Study: The West Morava River Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kume, Alfred & Hashorva, Enkelejd, 2012. "Calculation of Bayes premium for conditional elliptical risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 632-635.
    2. Castañer, A. & Claramunt, M.M. & Lefèvre, C., 2013. "Survival probabilities in bivariate risk models, with application to reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 632-642.
    3. B. Başbuğ & Henry Wynn, 2006. "Patterns in the Turkish reinsurance claim data, 1998–2002: An application of the extreme value theory," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 39(2), pages 329-342, October.
    4. Mohamed Amine Lkabous & Jean-François Renaud, 2018. "A VaR-Type Risk Measure Derived from Cumulative Parisian Ruin for the Classical Risk Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, August.
    5. Julien Trufin & Stéphane Loisel, 2013. "Ultimate ruin probability in discrete time with Bühlmann credibility premium adjustments," Post-Print hal-00426790, HAL.
    6. Yuanying Guan & Zhanyi Jiao & Ruodu Wang, 2022. "A reverse ES (CVaR) optimization formula," Papers 2203.02599, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    7. Kaluszka, M. & Laeven, R.J.A. & Okolewski, A., 2012. "A note on weighted premium calculation principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 379-381.
    8. Fang, Jun & Jiang, Fan & Liu, Yong & Yang, Jingping, 2020. "Copula-based Markov process," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 166-187.
    9. Dan Zhu & Ming Zhou & Chuancun Yin, 2023. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities of Bidimensional Risk Models with Correlated Brownian Motions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Cheung, Ka Chun & Lo, Ambrose, 2013. "General lower bounds on convex functionals of aggregate sums," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 884-896.
    11. Van Weert, Koen & Dhaene, Jan & Goovaerts, Marc, 2010. "Optimal portfolio selection for general provisioning and terminal wealth problems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 90-97, August.
    12. Zhifei Deng & Jifu Liu & Lanlan Guo & Jiaoyang Li & Junming Li & Yiru Jia, 2021. "Pure risk premium rating of debris flows based on a dynamic run-out model: a case study in Anzhou, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 235-253, March.
    13. Liivika Tee & Meelis Käärik & Rauno Viin, 2017. "On Comparison of Stochastic Reserving Methods with Bootstrapping," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel, 2013. "On multiply monotone distributions, continuous or discrete, with applications," Post-Print hal-00750562, HAL.
    15. Eling, Martin & Wirfs, Jan Hendrik, 2016. "Cyber Risk: Too Big to Insure? Risk Transfer Options for a mercurial risk class," I.VW HSG Schriftenreihe, University of St.Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics (I.VW-HSG), volume 59, number 59.
    16. Sancho Salcedo-Sanz & Leo Carro-Calvo & Mercè Claramunt & Ana Castañer & Maite Mármol, 2014. "Effectively Tackling Reinsurance Problems by Using Evolutionary and Swarm Intelligence Algorithms," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Harsh K. Mistry & Domenico Lombardi, 2023. "A stochastic exposure model for seismic risk assessment and pricing of catastrophe bonds," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 803-829, May.
    18. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00750562 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Burnecki, Krzysztof & Janczura, Joanna & Weron, Rafal, 2010. "Building Loss Models," MPRA Paper 25492, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Ikefuji, Masako & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Magnus, Jan R. & Muris, Chris, 2015. "Expected utility and catastrophic consumption risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 306-312.
    21. Stadje, M.A. & Pelsser, A., 2014. "Time-Consistent and Market-Consistent Evaluations (Revised version of 2012-086)," Discussion Paper 2014-002, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:85:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2578-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.