IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v103y2020i1d10.1007_s11069-020-03985-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical model for fatality estimation of earthquakes in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Erfan Firuzi

    (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES))

  • Kambod Amini Hosseini

    (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES))

  • Anooshiravan Ansari

    (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES))

  • Yasamin O. Izadkhah

    (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES))

  • Mina Rashidabadi

    (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES))

  • Mohammad Hosseini

    (International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (IIEES))

Abstract

In order to estimate the human loss after an earthquake to address risk mitigation and response measures, appropriate models should be developed based on local conditions. In this paper, an empirical model for estimating the mortality rate based on shaking related parameter (PGA) is presented for Iran. For this purpose, a reliable fatality database of past earthquakes occurred in the country (between 1962 and 2017) along with corresponding ground motion shaking maps were compiled. It includes information of 88 fatal earthquakes in different cities and villages, compiled from reliable resources. Three distinct functional forms including log-linear, exponential and lognormal cumulative distribution were applied to be fitted to data. To evaluate the appropriateness of different functional forms a residual analysis was performed. The results indicate that the log-linear model shows the best performance. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of events with highest contributions in database on fatality function. The results depicted that excluding data of Bam (2003), Iran Earthquake may reduce fatality ratio to about 5%. This can be related to the paucity of data in high acceleration ranges (near 800 cm/s2) in the database. Finally, two separate curves have been developed for day and night. As expected, the result depicted that fatality ratio in day time is much lower than the night hours. The proposed model can be used for rapid loss assessment in Iran and other countries with similar construction types to provide an initial estimation of deaths after earthquakes or determining the priorities for risk reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Erfan Firuzi & Kambod Amini Hosseini & Anooshiravan Ansari & Yasamin O. Izadkhah & Mina Rashidabadi & Mohammad Hosseini, 2020. "An empirical model for fatality estimation of earthquakes in Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 231-250, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-03985-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-03985-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-020-03985-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-020-03985-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stav Shapira & Limor Aharonson-Daniel & Igal Shohet & Corinne Peek-Asa & Yaron Bar-Dayan, 2015. "Integrating epidemiological and engineering approaches in the assessment of human casualties in earthquakes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(2), pages 1447-1462, September.
    2. H. Zafarani & M. Mousavi, 2014. "Applicability of different ground-motion prediction models for northern Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 73(3), pages 1199-1228, September.
    3. M. Bastami & M. R. Soghrat, 2017. "An empirical method to estimate fatalities caused by earthquakes: the case of the Ahar–Varzaghan earthquakes (Iran)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 125-149, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yilong Li & Zhenguo Zhang & Wenqiang Wang & Xuping Feng, 2022. "Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Fatalities in Mainland China Based on Physical Simulation and Empirical Statistics—A Case Study of the 2021 Yangbi Earthquake," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Chaoxu Xia & Gaozhong Nie & Huayue Li & Xiwei Fan & Wenhua Qi, 2023. "A composite database of casualty-inducing earthquakes in mainland China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3321-3351, April.
    3. Chen, Weiyi & Zhang, Limao, 2022. "An automated machine learning approach for earthquake casualty rate and economic loss prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stav Shapira & Lena Novack & Yaron Bar-Dayan & Limor Aharonson-Daniel, 2016. "An Integrated and Interdisciplinary Model for Predicting the Risk of Injury and Death in Future Earthquakes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, March.
    2. Muhammet Gul & Ali Fuat Guneri, 2016. "An artificial neural network-based earthquake casualty estimation model for Istanbul city," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 2163-2178, December.
    3. Chaoxu Xia & Gaozhong Nie & Huayue Li & Xiwei Fan & Wenhua Qi, 2023. "A composite database of casualty-inducing earthquakes in mainland China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3321-3351, April.
    4. Li, Shuang & Yu, Xiaohui & Zhang, Yanjuan & Zhai, Changhai, 2018. "A numerical simulation strategy on occupant evacuation behaviors and casualty prediction in a building during earthquakes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1238-1250.
    5. Salma Ommi & Milad Janalipour, 2022. "Selection of shelters after earthquake using probabilistic seismic aftershock hazard analysis and remote sensing," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(1), pages 345-363, August.
    6. Tongyan Zheng & Lei Li & Chong Xu & Yuandong Huang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Earthquake Distribution and Associated Losses in Chinese Mainland from 1949 to 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Chen, Weiyi & Zhang, Limao, 2022. "An automated machine learning approach for earthquake casualty rate and economic loss prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    8. Xia Chaoxu & Nie Gaozhong & Fan Xiwei & Li Huayue & Zhou Junxue & Zeng Xun, 2022. "A new model for the quantitative assessment of earthquake casualties based on the correction of anti-lethal level," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1199-1226, January.
    9. Goran Grozdanić & Vladimir M. Cvetković & Tin Lukić & Aleksandar Ivanov, 2024. "Sustainable Earthquake Preparedness: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Analysis in Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-34, April.
    10. Stav Shapira & Tsafrir Levi & Yaron Bar-Dayan & Limor Aharonson-Daniel, 2018. "The impact of behavior on the risk of injury and death during an earthquake: a simulation-based study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(3), pages 1059-1074, April.
    11. Tingting Ji & Hsi-Hsien Wei & Igal M. Shohet & Feng Xiong, 2021. "Risk-based resilience concentration assessment of community to seismic hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1731-1751, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:103:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-020-03985-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.