IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v77y2014i5p695-720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new bounded log-linear regression model

Author

Listed:
  • HaiYing Wang
  • Nancy Flournoy
  • Eloi Kpamegan

Abstract

In this paper we introduce a new regression model in which the response variable is bounded by two unknown parameters. A special case is a bounded alternative to the four parameter logistic model. The four parameter model which has unbounded responses is widely used, for instance, in bioassays, nutrition, genetics, calibration and agriculture. In reality, the responses are often bounded although the bounds may be unknown, and in that situation, our model reflects the data-generating mechanism better. Complications arise for the new model, however, because the likelihood function is unbounded, and the global maximizers are not consistent estimators of unknown parameters. Although the two sample extremes, the smallest and the largest observations, are consistent estimators for the two unknown boundaries, they have a slow convergence rate and are asymptotically biased. Improved estimators are developed by correcting for the asymptotic biases of the two sample extremes in the one sample case; but even these consistent estimators do not obtain the optimal convergence rate. To obtain efficient estimation, we suggest using the local maximizers of the likelihood function, i.e., the solution to the likelihood equations. We prove that, with probability approaching one as the sample size goes to infinity, there exists a solution to the likelihood equation that is consistent at the rate of the square root of the sample size and it is asymptotically normally distributed. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Suggested Citation

  • HaiYing Wang & Nancy Flournoy & Eloi Kpamegan, 2014. "A new bounded log-linear regression model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(5), pages 695-720, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:77:y:2014:i:5:p:695-720
    DOI: 10.1007/s00184-013-0460-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00184-013-0460-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00184-013-0460-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Hall & Julian Z. Wang, 2005. "Bayesian likelihood methods for estimating the end point of a distribution," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 717-729, November.
    2. Varadhan, Ravi & Gilbert, Paul, 2009. "BB: An R Package for Solving a Large System of Nonlinear Equations and for Optimizing a High-Dimensional Nonlinear Objective Function," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 32(i04).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergey Tarima & Nancy Flournoy, 2022. "Most powerful test sequences with early stopping options," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 491-513, May.
    2. Sergey Tarima & Nancy Flournoy, 2019. "Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators with sample size recalculation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 373-394, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Castillo, Joan del & Serra, Isabel, 2015. "Likelihood inference for generalized Pareto distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 116-128.
    2. Martin Gaynor & Nirav Mehta & Seth Richards-Shubik, 2023. "Optimal Contracting with Altruistic Agents: Medicare Payments for Dialysis Drugs," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(6), pages 1530-1571, June.
    3. Legrand, Catherine & Munda, Marco & Janssen, P. & Duchateau, L., 2012. "A general class of time-varying coefficients models for right censored data," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2012041, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    4. Nathan H. Miller & Matthew Osborne, 2014. "Spatial differentiation and price discrimination in the cement industry: evidence from a structural model," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(2), pages 221-247, June.
    5. Bella Vakulenko‐Lagun & Micha Mandel & Rebecca A. Betensky, 2020. "Inverse probability weighting methods for Cox regression with right‐truncated data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 484-495, June.
    6. Galea, Manuel & de Castro, Mário, 2017. "Robust inference in a linear functional model with replications using the t distribution," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 134-145.
    7. Nikoloulopoulos, Aristidis K., 2023. "Efficient and feasible inference for high-dimensional normal copula regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    8. Predrag M. Popović & Miroslav M. Ristić & Aleksandar S. Nastić, 2016. "A geometric bivariate time series with different marginal parameters," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 731-753, September.
    9. Božidar Popović & Saralees Nadarajah & Miroslav Ristić, 2013. "A new non-linear AR(1) time series model having approximate beta marginals," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 71-92, January.
    10. Bruno Ebner & Bernhard Klar & Simos G. Meintanis, 2018. "Fourier inference for stochastic volatility models with heavy-tailed innovations," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1043-1060, September.
    11. Chien-Lin Su & Russell J. Steele & Ian Shrier, 2021. "The semiparametric accelerated trend-renewal process for recurrent event data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 357-387, July.
    12. Martin Gaynor & Nirav Mehta & Seth Richards-Shubik, 2020. "Optimal Contracting with Altruistic Agents: A Structural Model of Medicare Payments for Dialysis Drugs," NBER Working Papers 27172, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Ouindllassida Jean-Etienne Ou´edraogo & Edoh Katchekpele & Simplice Dossou-Gb´et´e, 2021. "Marginalized Maximum Likelihood for Parameters Estimation of the Three Parameter Weibull Distribution," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 1-62, July.
    14. Muhammad Ahsan ul Haq & Sharqa Hashmi & Khaoula Aidi & Pedro Luiz Ramos & Francisco Louzada, 2023. "Unit Modified Burr-III Distribution: Estimation, Characterizations and Validation Test," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 415-440, April.
    15. repec:jss:jstsof:43:i09 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Chiou, Sy Han & Kang, Sangwook & Yan, Jun, 2014. "Fitting Accelerated Failure Time Models in Routine Survival Analysis with R Package aftgee," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 61(i11).
    17. Alai, Daniel H. & Landsman, Zinoviy & Sherris, Michael, 2013. "Lifetime dependence modelling using a truncated multivariate gamma distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 542-549.
    18. Georgios Digkas & Konstantinos Petridis & Alexander Chatzigeorgiou & Emmanouil Stiakakis & Ali Emrouznejad, 2020. "Measuring Spatio-temporal Efficiency: An R Implementation for Time-Evolving Units," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(4), pages 843-864, December.
    19. Robert Vlacuha & Boris Frankovic, 2015. "The Calibration of Weights by Calif Tool in the Practice of the Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 63(2), pages 153-164, June.
    20. Wang, Haiying & Sun, Dongchu, 2012. "Objective Bayesian analysis for a truncated model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(12), pages 2125-2135.
    21. Jose-Alberto Guerra & Myra Mohnen, 2022. "Multinomial Choice with Social Interactions: Occupations in Victorian London," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(4), pages 736-747, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:77:y:2014:i:5:p:695-720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.