IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metrik/v19y2008i1p39-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Abschied vom Marktwachstums-Marktanteils-Portfolio nach über 35 Jahren Einsatz? Eine kritische Überprüfung der BCG-Matrix

Author

Listed:
  • Hanno Drews

Abstract

The Growth Share Matrix (BCG Matrix) was introduced by the Boston Consulting Group more than 35 years ago and is still in widespread use despite severe doubts as to its suitability. This paper summarizes the respective research results gathered over the years and illustrates the problems of the BCG matrix by means of a case study on the aviation group Lufthansa. Finally, potential consequences for practical application, teaching and research are discussed. The author concludes that the deficiencies of the BCG matrix are not compensated by its potential benefits and, hence, it should not be used. One cannot recommend without reservation to follow the example of Kotler and Keller and remove the BCG matrix from textbooks. However, at least it must not be taught or used as a prescriptive guide or without proper critical review. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2008

Suggested Citation

  • Hanno Drews, 2008. "Abschied vom Marktwachstums-Marktanteils-Portfolio nach über 35 Jahren Einsatz? Eine kritische Überprüfung der BCG-Matrix," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 39-57, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:39-57
    DOI: 10.1007/s00187-008-0041-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00187-008-0041-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00187-008-0041-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kesten C. Green & J. Scott Armstrong, 2005. "Competitor-oriented Objectives: The Myth of Market Share," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 17/05, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    2. Armstrong, J. Scott & Brodie, Roderick J., 1994. "Effects of portfolio planning methods on decision making: experimental results," MPRA Paper 81684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Arnoldo C. Hax & Nicolas S. Majluf, 1983. "The Use of the Growth-Share Matrix in Strategic Planning," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 46-60, February.
    4. Marcus Pick & Norbert Sträter, 2005. "Die Anwendung der Portfolio-Methode nach McKinsey in jungen Unternehmen," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 167-188, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zdeněk Konečný & Marek Zinecker, 2015. "Using the Boston Matrix at Identification of the Corporate Life Cycle Stage," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(1), pages 235-243.
    2. Stops, Michael & Bächmann, Ann-Christin & Glassner, Ralf & Janser, Markus & Matthes, Britta & Metzger, Lina-Jeanette & Müller, Christoph & Seitz, Joachim, 2021. "Extracting Skill Requirements from Job Ads – the “Machbarkeitsstudie Kompetenz-Kompass”," IAB-Forschungsbericht 202107, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Villiers, Rouxelle & Woodside, Arch G. & Marshall, Roger, 2016. "Making tough decisions competently: Assessing the value of product portfolio planning methods, devil’s advocacy, group discussion, weighting priorities, and evidenced-based information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2849-2862.
    2. Woodside, Arch G., 2012. "Incompetency training: Theory, practice, and remedies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 279-293.
    3. Nippa, Michael, 2011. "Zur Notwendigkeit des Corporate Portfolio Management: Eine Würdigung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung der letzten vier Jahrzehnte," Freiberg Working Papers 2011/02, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    4. Snyder, Ralph D. & Ord, J. Keith & Koehler, Anne B. & McLaren, Keith R. & Beaumont, Adrian N., 2017. "Forecasting compositional time series: A state space approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 502-512.
    5. Florin Tudor Ionescu, 2011. "Boston Consulting Group II – A Business Portfolio Analysis Matrix," International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(2), pages 65-70, September.
    6. Josep M. Argilés-Bosch & Josep Garcia-Blandón & Diego Ravenda & Mónica Martínez-Blasco, 2018. "An empirical analysis of the curvilinear relationship between slack and firm performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 361-397, December.
    7. Armstrong, J. Scott & Brodie, Roderick J., 1994. "Effects of portfolio planning methods on decision making: experimental results," MPRA Paper 81684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. J. Scott Armstrong & Philippe Jacquart, 2013. "The Ombudsman: Is the Evidence Sufficient to Take Action on Executive Pay? Reply to Commentators," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 602-604, December.
    9. Juhi Gahlot Sarkar, 2019. "Managing brand strength in a brand portfolio: A conceptual analysis," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 5(4), pages 219-227.
    10. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    11. Yuhei Ito & Malcolm Morgan & Robin Lovelace, 2023. "Where to invest in cycle parking: A portfolio management approach to spatial transport planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1438-1454, July.
    12. Mohamed Dahir Mohamed & Halima Hassan Mohamed & Abdiqathar Ahmed Jama & Christine Achot & Halima Abdi Dibit & Peterson Obara Magutu & Richard Bitange Nyaoga, 2019. "Information Systems Outsourcing Drivers And Service Delivery Of Commercial Banks In Kenya," Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 3(1), pages 10-24, January.
    13. Eleftherios Kourtis & Michael Kourtis & Panayiotis Curtis & Michael Hanias, 2022. "Sustainable Business Growth, Value Creation and Dynamic Competitive Advantage: The Greek Pharmaceutical Industry," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 46-79.
    14. Panayiotis Curtis & Michael Hanias & Eleftherios Kourtis & Michael Kourtis, 2021. "Financial Performance Assessment οf Strategy for Building Resilience and Readiness in the Hotel Sector of Greece," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 11(2), pages 3-27.
    15. Gerasimos T. Soldatos, 2021. "A model of market competition as a prize contest or a model of strife for market domination," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, January.
    16. repec:hal:pseose:halshs-00825217 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Vilarinho, Hermilio & D’Inverno, Giovanna & Nóvoa, Henriqueta & Camanho, Ana S., 2023. "The measurement of asset management performance of water companies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    18. Kesten C. Green & J. Scott Armstrong, 2005. "Competitor-oriented Objectives: The Myth of Market Share," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 17/05, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    19. Nudurupati, Sai Sudhakar & Bhattacharya, Arijit & Lascelles, David & Caton, Nicholas, 2015. "Strategic sourcing with multi-stakeholders through value co-creation: An evidence from global health care company," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 248-257.
    20. JS Armstrong & Fred Collopy, 2004. "Effects of Objectives and Information on Managerial Decisions and Profitability," General Economics and Teaching 0412014, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Kougias, Ioannis & Szabó, Sándor, 2017. "Pumped hydroelectric storage utilization assessment: Forerunner of renewable energy integration or Trojan horse?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 318-329.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metrik:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:39-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.