IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/masfgc/v24y2019i6d10.1007_s11027-018-9836-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A high-definition spatially explicit modelling approach for national greenhouse gas emissions from industrial processes: reducing the errors and uncertainties in global emission modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Nadiia Charkovska

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

  • Mariia Halushchak

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University
    International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis)

  • Rostyslav Bun

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University
    WSB University)

  • Zbigniew Nahorski

    (Polish Academy of Sciences
    Warsaw School of Information Technology)

  • Tomohiro Oda

    (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
    Universities Space Research Association)

  • Matthias Jonas

    (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis)

  • Petro Topylko

    (Lviv Polytechnic National University)

Abstract

Industrial processes cause significant emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to the atmosphere and, therefore, have high mitigation and adaptation potential for global change. Spatially explicit (gridded) emission inventories (EIs) should allow us to analyse sectoral emission patterns to estimate the potential impacts of emission policies and support decisions on reducing emissions. However, such EIs are often based on simple downscaling of national level emission estimates and the changes in subnational emission distributions do not necessarily reflect the actual changes driven by the local emission drivers. This article presents a high-definition, 100-m resolution bottom-up inventory of GHG emissions from industrial processes (fuel combustion activities in energy and manufacturing industries, fugitive emissions, mineral products, chemical industries, metal production and food and drink industries), which is exemplified for data for Poland. The study objectives include elaboration of the universal approach for mapping emission sources, algorithms for emission disaggregation, estimation of emissions at the source level and uncertainty analysis. We start with IPCC-compliant national sectoral GHG estimates made using Polish official statistics and, then, propose an improved emission disaggregation algorithm that fully utilises a collection of activity data available at the national/provincial level to the level of individual point and diffused (area) emission sources. To ensure the accuracy of the resulting 100-m resolution emission fields, the geospatial data used for mapping emission sources (point source geolocation and land cover classification) were subject to thorough human visual inspection. The resulting 100-m emission field even holds cadastres of emissions separately for each industrial emission category. We also compiled cadastres in regular grids and, then, compared them with the Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). A quantitative analysis of discrepancies between both results reveals quite frequent misallocations of point sources used in the EDGAR compilation that considerably deteriorate high-resolution inventories. We also use a Monte-Carlo method-based uncertainty assessment that yields a detailed estimation of the GHG emission uncertainty in the main categories of the analysed processes. We found that the above-mentioned geographical coordinates and patterns used for emission disaggregation have the greatest impact on the overall uncertainty of GHG inventories from the industrial processes. We evaluate the mitigation potential of industrial emissions and the impact of separate emission categories. This study proposes a method to accurately quantify industrial emissions at a policy relevant spatial scale in order to contribute to the local climate mitigation via emission quantification (local to national) and scientific assessment of the mitigation effort (national to global). Apart from the above, the results are also of importance for studies that confront bottom-up and top-down approaches and represent much more accurate data for global high-resolution inventories to compare with.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadiia Charkovska & Mariia Halushchak & Rostyslav Bun & Zbigniew Nahorski & Tomohiro Oda & Matthias Jonas & Petro Topylko, 2019. "A high-definition spatially explicit modelling approach for national greenhouse gas emissions from industrial processes: reducing the errors and uncertainties in global emission modelling," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 907-939, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:24:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s11027-018-9836-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11027-018-9836-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11027-018-9836-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11027-018-9836-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, Sangwon & Lee, Seungmoon & Jeong, Suk Jae & Song, Ho-Jun & Park, Jin-Won, 2010. "Assessment of CO2 emissions and its reduction potential in the Korean petroleum refining industry using energy-environment models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 2419-2429.
    2. Shao, Shuai & Liu, Jianghua & Geng, Yong & Miao, Zhuang & Yang, Yingchun, 2016. "Uncovering driving factors of carbon emissions from China’s mining sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 220-238.
    3. Government of Fiji, 2017. "Climate Vulnerability Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 28870, The World Bank Group.
    4. Dan Tong & Qiang Zhang & Steven J. Davis & Fei Liu & Bo Zheng & Guannan Geng & Tao Xue & Meng Li & Chaopeng Hong & Zifeng Lu & David G. Streets & Dabo Guan & Kebin He, 2018. "Targeted emission reductions from global super-polluting power plant units," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 59-68, January.
    5. Khrystyna Boychuk & Rostyslav Bun, 2014. "Regional spatial inventories (cadastres) of GHG emissions in the Energy sector: Accounting for uncertainty," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 561-574, June.
    6. Hondo, Hiroki, 2005. "Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 2042-2056.
    7. Long, Ruyin & Shao, Tianxiang & Chen, Hong, 2016. "Spatial econometric analysis of China’s province-level industrial carbon productivity and its influencing factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 210-219.
    8. Garnett, Tara, 2011. "Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(S1), pages 23-32.
    9. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Hao, Jun-Fang & Song, Juan, 2016. "The CO2 emission efficiency, reduction potential and spatial clustering in China’s industry: Evidence from the regional level," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 213-223.
    10. Zhu Liu & Dabo Guan & Wei Wei & Steven J. Davis & Philippe Ciais & Jin Bai & Shushi Peng & Qiang Zhang & Klaus Hubacek & Gregg Marland & Robert J. Andres & Douglas Crawford-Brown & Jintai Lin & Hongya, 2015. "Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China," Nature, Nature, vol. 524(7565), pages 335-338, August.
    11. Hao, Han & Geng, Yong & Hang, Wen, 2016. "GHG emissions from primary aluminum production in China: Regional disparity and policy implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 264-272.
    12. Liu, Zhu, 2016. "National carbon emissions from the industry process: Production of glass, soda ash, ammonia, calcium carbide and alumina," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 239-244.
    13. Griffin, Paul W. & Hammond, Geoffrey P. & Norman, Jonathan B., 2018. "Industrial energy use and carbon emissions reduction in the chemicals sector: A UK perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 587-602.
    14. Szklo, Alexandre & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2007. "Fuel specification, energy consumption and CO2 emission in oil refineries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1075-1092.
    15. Tian, Yihui & Zhu, Qinghua & Geng, Yong, 2013. "An analysis of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese iron and steel industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 352-361.
    16. Maya G. Hutchins & Jeffrey D. Colby & Gregg Marland & Eric Marland, 2017. "A comparison of five high-resolution spatially-explicit, fossil-fuel, carbon dioxide emission inventories for the United States," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 947-972, August.
    17. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Bin, 2018. "Growth of industrial CO2 emissions in Shanghai city: Evidence from a dynamic vector autoregression analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 167-177.
    18. Raupach, M.R. & Rayner, P.J. & Paget, M., 2010. "Regional variations in spatial structure of nightlights, population density and fossil-fuel CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 4756-4764, September.
    19. Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan & Liang, Liang, 2016. "CO2 emissions and energy intensity reduction allocation over provincial industrial sectors in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 282-291.
    20. Liu, Zhe & Geng, Yong & Adams, Michelle & Dong, Liang & Sun, Lina & Zhao, Jingjing & Dong, Huijuan & Wu, Jiao & Tian, Xu, 2016. "Uncovering driving forces on greenhouse gas emissions in China’ aluminum industry from the perspective of life cycle analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 253-263.
    21. Yu, Shiwei & Gao, Siwei & sun, Han, 2016. "A dynamic programming model for environmental investment decision-making in coal mining," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 273-281.
    22. Garnett, Tara, 2011. "Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 23-32, January.
    23. Rostyslav Bun & Zbigniew Nahorski & Joanna Horabik-Pyzel & Olha Danylo & Linda See & Nadiia Charkovska & Petro Topylko & Mariia Halushchak & Myroslava Lesiv & Mariia Valakh & Vitaliy Kinakh, 2019. "Development of a high-resolution spatial inventory of greenhouse gas emissions for Poland from stationary and mobile sources," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 853-880, August.
    24. Cai, Bofeng & Wang, Jinnan & He, Jie & Geng, Yong, 2016. "Evaluating CO2 emission performance in China’s cement industry: An enterprise perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 191-200.
    25. Yong Geng & Yiming Wei & Manfred Fischedick & Lynn Price & Anthony Chiu & Bin Chen (ed.), 2016. "Recent trend of industrial emissions in developing countries," CEEP-BIT Books, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology, number b14, december.
    26. Shan, Yuli & Liu, Zhu & Guan, Dabo, 2016. "CO2 emissions from China’s lime industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 245-252.
    27. AkbostancI, Elif & Tunç, Gül Ipek & Türüt-AsIk, Serap, 2011. "CO2 emissions of Turkish manufacturing industry: A decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2273-2278, June.
    28. Zuoxi Liu & Huijuan Dong & Yong Geng & Chengpeng Lu & Wanxia Ren, 2014. "Insights into the Regional Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission of Industrial Processes: A Case Study of Shenyang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi Xiao & Keying Li & Yi Hu & Jin Xiao & Shouyang Wang, 2020. "Combining STRIPAT model and gated recurrent unit for forecasting nature gas consumption of China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1325-1343, October.
    2. Tomohiro Oda & Rostyslav Bun & Vitaliy Kinakh & Petro Topylko & Mariia Halushchak & Gregg Marland & Thomas Lauvaux & Matthias Jonas & Shamil Maksyutov & Zbigniew Nahorski & Myroslava Lesiv & Olha Dany, 2019. "Errors and uncertainties in a gridded carbon dioxide emissions inventory," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1007-1050, August.
    3. Matthias Jonas & Rostyslav Bun & Zbigniew Nahorski & Gregg Marland & Mykola Gusti & Olha Danylo, 2019. "Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 839-852, August.
    4. Mathieu Fortin, 2021. "Comparison of uncertainty quantification techniques for national greenhouse gas inventories," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Rui & Geng, Yong & Cui, Xiaowei & Gao, Ziyan & Liu, Zhiqing, 2019. "Reasons for recent stagnancy of carbon emissions in China's industrial sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 457-466.
    2. Wang, Yutao & Yang, Xuechun & Sun, Mingxing & Ma, Lei & Li, Xiao & Shi, Lei, 2016. "Estimating carbon emissions from the pulp and paper industry: A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 779-789.
    3. Zhang, You & Yuan, Zengwei & Margni, Manuele & Bulle, Cécile & Hua, Hui & Jiang, Songyan & Liu, Xuewei, 2019. "Intensive carbon dioxide emission of coal chemical industry in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 540-550.
    4. Yuhuan Zhao & Hao Li & Zhonghua Zhang & Yongfeng Zhang & Song Wang & Ya Liu, 2017. "Decomposition and scenario analysis of CO2 emissions in China’s power industry: based on LMDI method," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(2), pages 645-668, March.
    5. Zhang, Puwei & You, Jianxin & Jia, Guangshe & Chen, Jindao & Yu, Anyu, 2018. "Estimation of carbon efficiency decomposition in materials and potential material savings for China's construction industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 148-159.
    6. Shuai Qin & Hong Chen & Haokun Wang, 2021. "Spatial–Temporal Heterogeneity and Driving Factors of Rural Residents’ Food Consumption Carbon Emissions in China—Based on an ESDA-GWR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Shan, Yuli & Liu, Jianghua & Liu, Zhu & Xu, Xinwanghao & Shao, Shuai & Wang, Peng & Guan, Dabo, 2016. "New provincial CO2 emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 742-750.
    8. Liu, Zhe & Geng, Yong & Adams, Michelle & Dong, Liang & Sun, Lina & Zhao, Jingjing & Dong, Huijuan & Wu, Jiao & Tian, Xu, 2016. "Uncovering driving forces on greenhouse gas emissions in China’ aluminum industry from the perspective of life cycle analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 253-263.
    9. Wang, Yuan & Zhang, Chen & Lu, Aitong & Li, Li & He, Yanmin & ToJo, Junji & Zhu, Xiaodong, 2017. "A disaggregated analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for industrial CO2 emissions in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 172-180.
    10. Nadiia Charkovska & Joanna Horabik-Pyzel & Rostyslav Bun & Olha Danylo & Zbigniew Nahorski & Matthias Jonas & Xu Xiangyang, 2019. "High-resolution spatial distribution and associated uncertainties of greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 881-905, August.
    11. Li, Shupeng & Niu, Liping & Yue, Qiang & Zhang, Tingan, 2022. "Trajectory, driving forces, and mitigation potential of energy-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China's primary aluminum industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    12. Rostyslav Bun & Zbigniew Nahorski & Joanna Horabik-Pyzel & Olha Danylo & Linda See & Nadiia Charkovska & Petro Topylko & Mariia Halushchak & Myroslava Lesiv & Mariia Valakh & Vitaliy Kinakh, 2019. "Development of a high-resolution spatial inventory of greenhouse gas emissions for Poland from stationary and mobile sources," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 853-880, August.
    13. Xiao, Hongwei & Ma, Zhongyu & Mi, Zhifu & Kelsey, John & Zheng, Jiali & Yin, Weihua & Yan, Min, 2018. "Spatio-temporal simulation of energy consumption in China's provinces based on satellite night-time light data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1070-1078.
    14. Junjun Zheng & Mingmiao Yang & Gang Ma & Qian Xu & Yujie He, 2020. "Multi-Agents-Based Modeling and Simulation for Carbon Permits Trading in China: A Regional Development Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Yu, Biying & Zhao, Zihao & Zhang, Shuai & An, Runying & Chen, Jingming & Li, Ru & Zhao, Guangpu, 2021. "Technological development pathway for a low-carbon primary aluminum industry in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Tomohiro Oda & Rostyslav Bun & Vitaliy Kinakh & Petro Topylko & Mariia Halushchak & Gregg Marland & Thomas Lauvaux & Matthias Jonas & Shamil Maksyutov & Zbigniew Nahorski & Myroslava Lesiv & Olha Dany, 2019. "Errors and uncertainties in a gridded carbon dioxide emissions inventory," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1007-1050, August.
    17. Chen, Huadun & Du, Qianxi & Huo, Tengfei & Liu, Peiran & Cai, Weiguang & Liu, Bingsheng, 2023. "Spatiotemporal patterns and driving mechanism of carbon emissions in China's urban residential building sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    18. Dorward, Leejiah J., 2012. "Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)? A comment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 463-466.
    19. Xiao, Huijuan & Wang, Daoping & Qi, Yu & Shao, Shuai & Zhou, Ya & Shan, Yuli, 2021. "The governance-production nexus of eco-efficiency in Chinese resource-based cities: A two-stage network DEA approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    20. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-Ming & Guo, Haixiang & Ding, Liping, 2014. "Carbon emission coefficient measurement of the coal-to-power energy chain in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 290-300.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:24:y:2019:i:6:d:10.1007_s11027-018-9836-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.