IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/lifeda/v25y2019i1d10.1007_s10985-018-9422-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model diagnostics for the proportional hazards model with length-biased data

Author

Listed:
  • Chi Hyun Lee

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Jing Ning

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

  • Yu Shen

    (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)

Abstract

Length-biased data are frequently encountered in prevalent cohort studies. Many statistical methods have been developed to estimate the covariate effects on the survival outcomes arising from such data while properly adjusting for length-biased sampling. Among them, regression methods based on the proportional hazards model have been widely adopted. However, little work has focused on checking the proportional hazards model assumptions with length-biased data, which is essential to ensure the validity of inference. In this article, we propose a statistical tool for testing the assumed functional form of covariates and the proportional hazards assumption graphically and analytically under the setting of length-biased sampling, through a general class of multiparameter stochastic processes. The finite sample performance is examined through simulation studies, and the proposed methods are illustrated with the data from a cohort study of dementia in Canada.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Hyun Lee & Jing Ning & Yu Shen, 2019. "Model diagnostics for the proportional hazards model with length-biased data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 79-96, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:25:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10985-018-9422-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10985-018-9422-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10985-018-9422-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10985-018-9422-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kwun Chuen Gary Chan & Ying Qing Chen & Chong-Zhi Di, 2012. "Proportional mean residual life model for right-censored length-biased data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(4), pages 995-1000.
    2. Wenbin Lu & Mengling Liu & Yi-Hau Chen, 2014. "Testing goodness-of-fit for the proportional hazards model based on nested case–control data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 845-851, December.
    3. Ørnulf Borgan & Ying Zhang, 2015. "Using cumulative sums of martingale residuals for model checking in nested case‐control studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(3), pages 696-703, September.
    4. Chiung-yu Huang & Jing Qin, 2012. "Composite Partial Likelihood Estimation Under Length-Biased Sampling, With Application to a Prevalent Cohort Study of Dementia," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(499), pages 946-957, September.
    5. Jing Qin & Yu Shen, 2010. "Statistical Methods for Analyzing Right-Censored Length-Biased Data under Cox Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(2), pages 382-392, June.
    6. Shen, Yu & Ning, Jing & Qin, Jing, 2009. "Analyzing Length-Biased Data With Semiparametric Transformation and Accelerated Failure Time Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(487), pages 1192-1202.
    7. Wei Yann Tsai, 2009. "Pseudo-partial likelihood for proportional hazards models with biased-sampling data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 96(3), pages 601-615.
    8. Lancaster, Tony, 1979. "Econometric Methods for the Duration of Unemployment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(4), pages 939-956, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dexin Chen & Meiting Fu & Liangjie Chi & Liyan Lin & Jiaxin Cheng & Weisong Xue & Chenyan Long & Wei Jiang & Xiaoyu Dong & Jian Sui & Dajia Lin & Jianping Lu & Shuangmu Zhuo & Side Liu & Guoxin Li & G, 2022. "Prognostic and predictive value of a pathomics signature in gastric cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Shen & Jing Ning & Jing Qin, 2017. "Nonparametric and semiparametric regression estimation for length-biased survival data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 3-24, January.
    2. Zhang, Qiaozhen & Dai, Hongsheng & Fu, Bo, 2016. "A proportional hazards model for time-to-event data with epidemiological bias," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 224-236.
    3. Chengbo Li & Yong Zhou, 2021. "The estimation for the general additive–multiplicative hazard model using the length-biased survival data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 53-74, February.
    4. Ma, Huijuan & Zhang, Feipeng & Zhou, Yong, 2015. "Composite estimating equation approach for additive risk model with length-biased and right-censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 45-53.
    5. Yu-Jen Cheng & Chiung-Yu Huang, 2014. "Combined estimating equation approaches for semiparametric transformation models with length-biased survival data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 608-618, September.
    6. Zhiping Qiu & Jing Qin & Yong Zhou, 2016. "Composite Estimating Equation Method for the Accelerated Failure Time Model with Length-biased Sampling Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(2), pages 396-415, June.
    7. Yifan He & Yong Zhou, 2020. "Nonparametric and semiparametric estimators of restricted mean survival time under length-biased sampling," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 761-788, October.
    8. Micha Mandel & Jacobo de Uña†à lvarez & David K. Simon & Rebecca A. Betensky, 2018. "Inverse probability weighted Cox regression for doubly truncated data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 481-487, June.
    9. Fei Gao & Kwun Chuen Gary Chan, 2019. "Semiparametric regression analysis of length‐biased interval‐censored data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 121-132, March.
    10. Zexi Cai & Tony Sit, 2020. "Censored quantile regression model with time‐varying covariates under length‐biased sampling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1201-1215, December.
    11. Xuerong Chen & Yeqian Liu & Jianguo Sun & Yong Zhou, 2016. "Semiparametric Quantile Regression Analysis of Right-censored and Length-biased Failure Time Data with Partially Linear Varying Effects," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(4), pages 921-938, December.
    12. Na Hu & Xuerong Chen & Jianguo Sun, 2015. "Regression Analysis of Length-biased and Right-censored Failure Time Data with Missing Covariates," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(2), pages 438-452, June.
    13. Zhang, Feipeng & Peng, Heng & Zhou, Yong, 2016. "Composite partial likelihood estimation for length-biased and right-censored data with competing risks," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 160-176.
    14. Jieli Ding & Tsui-Shan Lu & Jianwen Cai & Haibo Zhou, 2017. "Recent progresses in outcome-dependent sampling with failure time data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 57-82, January.
    15. Shi, Jianhua & Ma, Huijuan & Zhou, Yong, 2018. "The nonparametric quantile estimation for length-biased and right-censored data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 150-158.
    16. Lin, Cunjie & Zhou, Yong, 2016. "Semiparametric varying-coefficient model with right-censored and length-biased data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 119-144.
    17. Chi Hyun Lee & Jing Ning & Yu Shen, 2018. "Analysis of restricted mean survival time for length†biased data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 575-583, June.
    18. Peng Liu & Yixin Wang & Yong Zhou, 2015. "Quantile residual lifetime with right-censored and length-biased data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(5), pages 999-1028, October.
    19. Chyong-Mei Chen & Pao-sheng Shen & Yi Liu, 2021. "On semiparametric transformation model with LTRC data: pseudo likelihood approach," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 3-30, February.
    20. James H. McVittie & Ana F. Best & David B. Wolfson & David A. Stephens & Julian Wolfson & David L. Buckeridge & Shahinaz M. Gadalla, 2023. "Survival Modelling for Data From Combined Cohorts: Opening the Door to Meta Survival Analyses and Survival Analysis Using Electronic Health Records," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(1), pages 72-87, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lifeda:v:25:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10985-018-9422-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.