IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v178y2018i3d10.1007_s10957-018-1328-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Envelope Functions: Unifications and Further Properties

Author

Listed:
  • Pontus Giselsson

    (Lund University)

  • Mattias Fält

    (Lund University)

Abstract

Forward–backward and Douglas–Rachford splitting are methods for structured nonsmooth optimization. With the aim to use smooth optimization techniques for nonsmooth problems, the forward–backward and Douglas–Rachford envelopes where recently proposed. Under specific problem assumptions, these envelope functions have favorable smoothness and convexity properties and their stationary points coincide with the fixed-points of the underlying algorithm operators. This allows for solving such nonsmooth optimization problems by minimizing the corresponding smooth convex envelope function. In this paper, we present a general envelope function that unifies and generalizes existing ones. We provide properties of the general envelope function that sharpen corresponding known results for the special cases. We also present a new interpretation of the underlying methods as being majorization–minimization algorithms applied to their respective envelope functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pontus Giselsson & Mattias Fält, 2018. "Envelope Functions: Unifications and Further Properties," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 673-698, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:178:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-018-1328-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10957-018-1328-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10957-018-1328-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10957-018-1328-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorenzo Stella & Andreas Themelis & Panagiotis Patrinos, 2017. "Forward–backward quasi-Newton methods for nonsmooth optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 443-487, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aviad Aberdam & Amir Beck, 2022. "An Accelerated Coordinate Gradient Descent Algorithm for Non-separable Composite Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 219-246, June.
    2. Yanli Liu & Wotao Yin, 2019. "An Envelope for Davis–Yin Splitting and Strict Saddle-Point Avoidance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 567-587, May.
    3. Ghaderi, Susan & Ahookhosh, Masoud & Arany, Adam & Skupin, Alexander & Patrinos, Panagiotis & Moreau, Yves, 2024. "Smoothing unadjusted Langevin algorithms for nonsmooth composite potential functions," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Kanzow & Theresa Lechner, 2021. "Globalized inexact proximal Newton-type methods for nonconvex composite functions," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 377-410, March.
    2. Tianxiang Liu & Ting Kei Pong, 2017. "Further properties of the forward–backward envelope with applications to difference-of-convex programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 489-520, July.
    3. Andreas Themelis & Lorenzo Stella & Panagiotis Patrinos, 2022. "Douglas–Rachford splitting and ADMM for nonconvex optimization: accelerated and Newton-type linesearch algorithms," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 395-440, June.
    4. Bastian Pötzl & Anton Schiela & Patrick Jaap, 2022. "Second order semi-smooth Proximal Newton methods in Hilbert spaces," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 465-498, June.
    5. Yanli Liu & Wotao Yin, 2019. "An Envelope for Davis–Yin Splitting and Strict Saddle-Point Avoidance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 567-587, May.
    6. Silvia Bonettini & Peter Ochs & Marco Prato & Simone Rebegoldi, 2023. "An abstract convergence framework with application to inertial inexact forward–backward methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 319-362, March.
    7. Peter Ochs, 2018. "Local Convergence of the Heavy-Ball Method and iPiano for Non-convex Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 153-180, April.
    8. Shummin Nakayama & Yasushi Narushima & Hiroshi Yabe, 2021. "Inexact proximal memoryless quasi-Newton methods based on the Broyden family for minimizing composite functions," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 127-154, May.
    9. Ghaderi, Susan & Ahookhosh, Masoud & Arany, Adam & Skupin, Alexander & Patrinos, Panagiotis & Moreau, Yves, 2024. "Smoothing unadjusted Langevin algorithms for nonsmooth composite potential functions," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 464(C).
    10. Tianxiang Liu & Akiko Takeda, 2022. "An inexact successive quadratic approximation method for a class of difference-of-convex optimization problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 141-173, May.
    11. Aviad Aberdam & Amir Beck, 2022. "An Accelerated Coordinate Gradient Descent Algorithm for Non-separable Composite Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 219-246, June.
    12. Luyun Wang & Bo Zhou, 2023. "A Modified Gradient Method for Distributionally Robust Logistic Regression over the Wasserstein Ball," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:178:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s10957-018-1328-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.