IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joptap/v120y2004i3d10.1023_bjota.0000025708.31430.22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflection-Projection Method for Convex Feasibility Problems with an Obtuse Cone

Author

Listed:
  • H. H. Bauschke

    (University of Guelph)

  • S. G. Kruk

    (Oakland University)

Abstract

The convex feasibility problem asks to find a point in the intersection of finitely many closed convex sets in Euclidean space. This problem is of fundamental importance in the mathematical and physical sciences, and it can be solved algorithmically by the classical method of cyclic projections. In this paper, the case where one of the constraints is an obtuse cone is considered. Because the nonnegative orthant as well as the set of positive-semidefinite symmetric matrices form obtuse cones, we cover a large and substantial class of feasibility problems. Motivated by numerical experiments, the method of reflection-projection is proposed: it modifies the method of cyclic projections in that it replaces the projection onto the obtuse cone by the corresponding reflection. This new method is not covered by the standard frameworks of projection algorithms because of the reflection. The main result states that the method does converge to a solution whenever the underlying convex feasibility problem is consistent. As prototypical applications, we discuss in detail the implementation of two-set feasibility problems aiming to find a nonnegative [resp. positive semidefinite] solution to linear constraints in ℝn [resp. in $$\mathbb{S}^n $$ , the space of symmetric n×n matrices] and we report on numerical experiments. The behavior of the method for two inconsistent constraints is analyzed as well.

Suggested Citation

  • H. H. Bauschke & S. G. Kruk, 2004. "Reflection-Projection Method for Convex Feasibility Problems with an Obtuse Cone," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 503-531, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:120:y:2004:i:3:d:10.1023_b:jota.0000025708.31430.22
    DOI: 10.1023/B:JOTA.0000025708.31430.22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000025708.31430.22
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000025708.31430.22?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu. E. Nesterov & M. J. Todd, 1997. "Self-Scaled Barriers and Interior-Point Methods for Convex Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 1-42, February.
    2. J. L. Goffin, 1980. "The Relaxation Method for Solving Systems of Linear Inequalities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 388-414, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minh N. Dao, & Hung M. Phan, 2019. "Linear Convergence of Projection Algorithms," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 715-738, May.
    2. Meng Wen & Jigen Peng & Yuchao Tang, 2015. "A Cyclic and Simultaneous Iterative Method for Solving the Multiple-Sets Split Feasibility Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 844-860, September.
    3. Heinz H. Bauschke & Caifang Wang & Xianfu Wang & Jia Xu, 2015. "On the Finite Convergence of a Projected Cutter Method," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 901-916, June.
    4. Jinhua Wang & Yaohua Hu & Carisa Kwok Wai Yu & Xiaojun Zhuang, 2019. "A Family of Projection Gradient Methods for Solving the Multiple-Sets Split Feasibility Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 520-534, November.
    5. Heinz H. Bauschke & Minh N. Dao & Dominikus Noll & Hung M. Phan, 2016. "On Slater’s condition and finite convergence of the Douglas–Rachford algorithm for solving convex feasibility problems in Euclidean spaces," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 329-349, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Epelman, Marina A., 1973-. & Freund, Robert Michael, 1997. "Condition number complexity of an elementary algorithm for resolving a conic linear system," Working papers WP 3942-97., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    2. Chee-Khian Sim, 2019. "Interior point method on semi-definite linear complementarity problems using the Nesterov–Todd (NT) search direction: polynomial complexity and local convergence," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 583-621, November.
    3. Sturm, J.F., 2001. "Avoiding Numerical Cancellation in the Interior Point Method for Solving Semidefinite Programs," Other publications TiSEM 949fb20a-a2c6-4d87-85ea-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Robert Chares & François Glineur, 2008. "An interior-point method for the single-facility location problem with mixed norms using a conic formulation," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 68(3), pages 383-405, December.
    5. Terlaky, Tamas, 2001. "An easy way to teach interior-point methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Michael Orlitzky, 2021. "Gaddum’s test for symmetric cones," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 927-940, April.
    7. B.V. Halldórsson & R.H. Tütüncü, 2003. "An Interior-Point Method for a Class of Saddle-Point Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 116(3), pages 559-590, March.
    8. G. Q. Wang & Y. Q. Bai, 2012. "A New Full Nesterov–Todd Step Primal–Dual Path-Following Interior-Point Algorithm for Symmetric Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 966-985, September.
    9. G. Q. Wang & L. C. Kong & J. Y. Tao & G. Lesaja, 2015. "Improved Complexity Analysis of Full Nesterov–Todd Step Feasible Interior-Point Method for Symmetric Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 588-604, August.
    10. Amitabh Basu & Jesús A. De Loera & Mark Junod, 2014. "On Chubanov's Method for Linear Programming," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 336-350, May.
    11. E. A. Yıldırım, 2003. "An Interior-Point Perspective on Sensitivity Analysis in Semidefinite Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 649-676, November.
    12. Xiao-Kang Wang & Wen-Hui Hou & Chao Song & Min-Hui Deng & Yong-Yi Li & Jian-Qiang Wang, 2021. "BW-MaxEnt: A Novel MCDM Method for Limited Knowledge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Annabella Astorino & Manlio Gaudioso & Alberto Seeger, 2016. "Central axes and peripheral points in high dimensional directional datasets," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 313-338, November.
    14. Héctor Ramírez & David Sossa, 2017. "On the Central Paths in Symmetric Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 172(2), pages 649-668, February.
    15. Vasile L. Basescu & John E. Mitchell, 2008. "An Analytic Center Cutting Plane Approach for Conic Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 529-551, August.
    16. Ximei Yang & Hongwei Liu & Yinkui Zhang, 2015. "A New Strategy in the Complexity Analysis of an Infeasible-Interior-Point Method for Symmetric Cone Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(2), pages 572-587, August.
    17. G. Q. Wang & Y. Q. Bai & X. Y. Gao & D. Z. Wang, 2015. "Improved Complexity Analysis of Full Nesterov–Todd Step Interior-Point Methods for Semidefinite Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 242-262, April.
    18. J.F. Sturm & S. Zhang, 1998. "On Sensitivity of Central Solutions in Semidefinite Programming," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 98-040/4, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Guo, Xue-Ping, 2016. "Convergence studies on block iterative algorithms for image reconstruction," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 525-534.
    20. Mehdi Karimi & Levent Tunçel, 2020. "Primal–Dual Interior-Point Methods for Domain-Driven Formulations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 591-621, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joptap:v:120:y:2004:i:3:d:10.1023_b:jota.0000025708.31430.22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.