IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v65y2016i2d10.1007_s10898-015-0373-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Slater’s condition and finite convergence of the Douglas–Rachford algorithm for solving convex feasibility problems in Euclidean spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Heinz H. Bauschke

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Minh N. Dao

    (University of British Columbia
    Hanoi National University of Education)

  • Dominikus Noll

    (Université de Toulouse)

  • Hung M. Phan

    (University of Massachusetts Lowell)

Abstract

The Douglas–Rachford algorithm is a classical and very successful method for solving optimization and feasibility problems. In this paper, we provide novel conditions sufficient for finite convergence in the context of convex feasibility problems. Our analysis builds upon, and considerably extends, pioneering work by Spingarn. Specifically, we obtain finite convergence in the presence of Slater’s condition in the affine-polyhedral and in a hyperplanar-epigraphical case. Various examples illustrate our results. Numerical experiments demonstrate the competitiveness of the Douglas–Rachford algorithm for solving linear equations with a positivity constraint when compared to the method of alternating projections and the method of reflection–projection.

Suggested Citation

  • Heinz H. Bauschke & Minh N. Dao & Dominikus Noll & Hung M. Phan, 2016. "On Slater’s condition and finite convergence of the Douglas–Rachford algorithm for solving convex feasibility problems in Euclidean spaces," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 329-349, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:65:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10898-015-0373-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-015-0373-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10898-015-0373-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-015-0373-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. H. Bauschke & S. G. Kruk, 2004. "Reflection-Projection Method for Convex Feasibility Problems with an Obtuse Cone," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 120(3), pages 503-531, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minh N. Dao, & Hung M. Phan, 2019. "Linear Convergence of Projection Algorithms," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 715-738, May.
    2. Minh N. Dao & Matthew K. Tam, 2019. "A Lyapunov-type approach to convergence of the Douglas–Rachford algorithm for a nonconvex setting," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 83-112, January.
    3. Heinz H. Bauschke & Minh N. Dao & Scott B. Lindstrom, 2019. "The Douglas–Rachford algorithm for a hyperplane and a doubleton," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 79-93, May.
    4. Minh N. Dao & Hung M. Phan, 2018. "Linear convergence of the generalized Douglas–Rachford algorithm for feasibility problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 443-474, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng Wen & Jigen Peng & Yuchao Tang, 2015. "A Cyclic and Simultaneous Iterative Method for Solving the Multiple-Sets Split Feasibility Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 844-860, September.
    2. Jinhua Wang & Yaohua Hu & Carisa Kwok Wai Yu & Xiaojun Zhuang, 2019. "A Family of Projection Gradient Methods for Solving the Multiple-Sets Split Feasibility Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 520-534, November.
    3. Heinz H. Bauschke & Caifang Wang & Xianfu Wang & Jia Xu, 2015. "On the Finite Convergence of a Projected Cutter Method," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 901-916, June.
    4. Minh N. Dao, & Hung M. Phan, 2019. "Linear Convergence of Projection Algorithms," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 715-738, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:65:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10898-015-0373-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.