IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v35y2024i7d10.1007_s10845-023-02216-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aic: an industrial knowledge graph with Abstraction-Instance-Capability reasoning abilities for personalized customization

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Zhang

    (Harbin Institute of Technology (Weihai))

  • Zhiying Tu

    (Harbin Institute of Technology (Weihai)
    State Key Laboratory of Massive Personalized Customization System and Technology)

  • Dianhui Chu

    (Harbin Institute of Technology (Weihai)
    State Key Laboratory of Massive Personalized Customization System and Technology)

  • Xiaoping Lu

    (State Key Laboratory of Massive Personalized Customization System and Technology
    COSMOPlat Institute of Industrial Intelligence Research (Qingdao) Co., Ltd.)

  • Lucheng Chen

    (State Key Laboratory of Massive Personalized Customization System and Technology
    COSMOPlat Institute of Industrial Intelligence Research (Qingdao) Co., Ltd.)

Abstract

In the era of the internet, people are increasingly interested in highly personalized customization, which has been leading the global industry to transform from “Enterprise centered Mass Manufacturing” to “User centered Mass Customization”. In recent decades, ontology-based semantic models have been used for semantic association description and syntax consistency alignment of product structures. However, the description of industrial terminology and general concepts has difficulty achieving accurate end-to-end matching of personalized user customization requirements and manufacturing capabilities. This requires detailed descriptions of process standards, component/assembly/part specifications, etc. Therefore, we propose the Abstraction-Instance-Capability (AIC) model based on a knowledge graph, which is a multigrained and multiview industrial knowledge model. By modeling industrial knowledge at a deeper level from various perspectives and by considering the expression of the relationships between knowledge, an industrial knowledge graph was constructed to support personalized customization. This graph can be used for personalized customization plan generation and other related operations, such as Design BOM (Bill of Materials) modification and verification. First, a meta-object facility (MOF)-based meta-model is defined for AIC model design. Second, the proposed model is used to define a multiview structure for modeling knowledge from various perspectives. Such a design realizes efficient industrial knowledge retrieval from various aspects, such as manufacturing resource retrieval, and production capacity analysis. Finally, in this paper we validate operability and introduce two case studies to demonstrate that the model has good performance in the recommendation of components (BOM modification) and the verification of personalized customization schemes (BOM verification).

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Zhang & Zhiying Tu & Dianhui Chu & Xiaoping Lu & Lucheng Chen, 2024. "Aic: an industrial knowledge graph with Abstraction-Instance-Capability reasoning abilities for personalized customization," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(7), pages 3419-3440, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02216-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-023-02216-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-023-02216-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-023-02216-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yingxin Ye & Tianliang Hu & Yan Yang & Wendan Zhu & Chengrui Zhang, 2020. "A knowledge based intelligent process planning method for controller of computer numerical control machine tools," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(7), pages 1751-1767, October.
    2. Eeva Järvenpää & Niko Siltala & Otto Hylli & Minna Lanz, 2019. "The development of an ontology for describing the capabilities of manufacturing resources," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 959-978, February.
    3. Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Benitez, Guilherme Brittes & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Frank, Alejandro Germán, 2018. "The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 383-394.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Altaf & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Abdul Hannan Qureshi, 2023. "Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) of construction projects: sustainability perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12071-12118, November.
    2. Gilberto Santos & Jose Carlos Sá & Maria João Félix & Luís Barreto & Filipe Carvalho & Manuel Doiro & Kristína Zgodavová & Miladin Stefanović, 2021. "New Needed Quality Management Skills for Quality Managers 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Ed Burton & David John Edwards & Chris Roberts & Nicholas Chileshe & Joseph H. K. Lai, 2021. "Delineating the Implications of Dispersing Teams and Teleworking in an Agile UK Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Michal Gluszak & Remigiusz Gawlik & Malgorzata Zieba, 2019. "Smart and Green Buildings Features in the Decision-Making Hierarchy of Office Space Tenants: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Prabhu Mannadhan & Jerzy Ryszard Szymański & Marta Zurek-Mortka & Mithileysh Sathiyanarayanan, 2024. "A Novel Framework for the Iraqi Manufacturing Industry Towards the Adoption of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Oscar F. Bustinza & Ferrán Vendrell-Herrero & Francisco J. Sánchez-Montesinos & José Antonio Campos-Granados, 2021. "Should Manufacturers Support the Entire Product Lifecycle with Services?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Jorge Andrés-Sánchez & Jaume Gené-Albesa, 2024. "Not with the bot! The relevance of trust to explain the acceptance of chatbots by insurance customers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Thurer, Matthias, 2021. "Identifying pathways to a high-performing lean automation implementation: An empirical study in the manufacturing industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    9. Ghannouchi, Imen, 2023. "Examining the dynamic nexus between industry 4.0 technologies and sustainable economy: New insights from empirical evidence using GMM estimator across 20 OECD nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Ismael Cristofer Baierle & Francisco Tardelli da Silva & Ricardo Gonçalves de Faria Correa & Jones Luís Schaefer & Matheus Becker Da Costa & Guilherme Brittes Benitez & Elpidio Oscar Benitez Nara, 2022. "Competitiveness of Food Industry in the Era of Digital Transformation towards Agriculture 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Li, Ying & Dai, Jing & Cui, Li, 2020. "The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: A moderated mediation model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    12. Turkcan, Hulya & Imamoglu, Salih Zeki & Ince, Huseyin, 2022. "To be more innovative and more competitive in dynamic environments: The role of additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    13. Xi, Mengjie & Liu, Yang & Fang, Wei & Feng, Taiwen, 2024. "Intelligent manufacturing for strengthening operational resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: A dynamic capability theory perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Rui Wang & Xiangyu Guo & Shisheng Zhong & Gaolei Peng & Lin Wang, 2022. "Decision rule mining for machining method chains based on rough set theory," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 799-807, March.
    15. Maria Kozlovska & Daria Klosova & Zuzana Strukova, 2021. "Impact of Industry 4.0 Platform on the Formation of Construction 4.0 Concept: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Kumar, Mukesh & Tsolakis, Naoum & Agarwal, Anshul & Srai, Jagjit Singh, 2020. "Developing distributed manufacturing strategies from the perspective of a product-process matrix," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 1-17.
    17. Zhang Yu & Muhammad Umar & S. Abdul Rehman, 2022. "Adoption of technological innovation and recycling practices in automobile sector: under the Covid-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 298-306, June.
    18. Inhye Yoo & Chan-Goo Yi, 2022. "Economic Innovation Caused by Digital Transformation and Impact on Social Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Olumide Emmanuel Oluyisola & Fabio Sgarbossa & Jan Ola Strandhagen, 2020. "Smart Production Planning and Control: Concept, Use-Cases and Sustainability Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-29, May.
    20. Sachin Kumar & T. Gopi & N. Harikeerthana & Munish Kumar Gupta & Vidit Gaur & Grzegorz M. Krolczyk & ChuanSong Wu, 2023. "Machine learning techniques in additive manufacturing: a state of the art review on design, processes and production control," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 21-55, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:35:y:2024:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-023-02216-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.