IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v34y2023i7d10.1007_s10845-022-01981-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep generative model with time series-image encoding for manufacturing fault detection in die casting process

Author

Listed:
  • Jiyoung Song

    (Korea Institute of Industrial Technology)

  • Young Chul Lee

    (Korea Institute of Industrial Technology)

  • Jeongsu Lee

    (Gachon University)

Abstract

The increasing demand for advanced fault detection in manufacturing processes has encouraged the application of industrial intelligence based on deep learning. However, implementing deep learning technology at actual manufacturing sites remains challenging because the data acquired during the manufacturing process are not only unlabeled but also imbalanced time series data. In this study, we constructed semi-supervised manufacturing fault detection methods to deal with the imbalanced time series data obtained from manufacturing applications, based on recently proposed deep generative models: variational autoencoder-reconstruction along projection pathway (VAE-RaPP) and Fence generative adversarial network (Fence GAN). To apply a semi-supervised learning algorithm, 1000 labeled samples of good product were prepared. The deep generative models learned the features of good product from these labeled samples during training. Consequently, the model was sufficiently trained to distinguish good and defective product in unlabeled samples. Additionally, we converted the time series data acquired during the manufacturing process into images to improve the feature extraction capability of deep neural networks based on three encoding methods: Gramian angular difference field (GADF), Markov transition field (MTF), and recurrence plot (RP). The performance of these methods was then compared using four evaluation indicators: area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), average precision (AP) score, precision-recall (PR) curve, and accuracy. The VAE-RaPP exhibited outstanding performance in all types of encoding methods when compared with the Fence GAN. This research provides a novel approach that combines the encoding of time series into images and deep generative models for manufacturing fault detection.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiyoung Song & Young Chul Lee & Jeongsu Lee, 2023. "Deep generative model with time series-image encoding for manufacturing fault detection in die casting process," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(7), pages 3001-3014, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:34:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-022-01981-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-022-01981-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-022-01981-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-022-01981-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takaya Saito & Marc Rehmsmeier, 2015. "The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Seokho Kang, 2020. "Joint modeling of classification and regression for improving faulty wafer detection in semiconductor manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 319-326, February.
    3. Sebastian Larsen & Paul A. Hooper, 2022. "Deep semi-supervised learning of dynamics for anomaly detection in laser powder bed fusion," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 457-471, February.
    4. Maciej Grzenda & Andres Bustillo, 2019. "Semi-supervised roughness prediction with partly unlabeled vibration data streams," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 933-945, February.
    5. Jialin Li & Xueyi Li & David He & Yongzhi Qu, 2020. "Unsupervised rotating machinery fault diagnosis method based on integrated SAE–DBN and a binary processor," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1899-1916, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sangho Lee & Youngdoo Son, 2021. "Motor Load Balancing with Roll Force Prediction for a Cold-Rolling Setup with Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Christopher J Greenwood & George J Youssef & Primrose Letcher & Jacqui A Macdonald & Lauryn J Hagg & Ann Sanson & Jenn Mcintosh & Delyse M Hutchinson & John W Toumbourou & Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz &, 2020. "A comparison of penalised regression methods for informing the selection of predictive markers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Jie-Huei Wang & Cheng-Yu Liu & You-Ruei Min & Zih-Han Wu & Po-Lin Hou, 2024. "Cancer Diagnosis by Gene-Environment Interactions via Combination of SMOTE-Tomek and Overlapped Group Screening Approaches with Application to Imbalanced TCGA Clinical and Genomic Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Le, Hong Hanh & Viviani, Jean-Laurent, 2018. "Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-25.
    5. João Chang Junior & Fábio Binuesa & Luiz Fernando Caneo & Aida Luiza Ribeiro Turquetto & Elisandra Cristina Trevisan Calvo Arita & Aline Cristina Barbosa & Alfredo Manoel da Silva Fernandes & Evelinda, 2020. "Improving preoperative risk-of-death prediction in surgery congenital heart defects using artificial intelligence model: A pilot study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Arthur De Sá Ferreira & Ney Meziat-Filho & Ana Paula Antunes Ferreira, 2021. "Double threshold receiver operating characteristic plot for three-modal continuous predictors," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 2231-2245, September.
    7. Fan, Xudong & Wang, Xiaowei & Zhang, Xijin & ASCE Xiong (Bill) Yu, P.E.F., 2022. "Machine learning based water pipe failure prediction: The effects of engineering, geology, climate and socio-economic factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Zhang, Han, 2021. "How Using Machine Learning Classification as a Variable in Regression Leads to Attenuation Bias and What to Do About It," SocArXiv 453jk, Center for Open Science.
    9. Masabho P Milali & Samson S Kiware & Nicodem J Govella & Fredros Okumu & Naveen Bansal & Serdar Bozdag & Jacques D Charlwood & Marta F Maia & Sheila B Ogoma & Floyd E Dowell & George F Corliss & Maggy, 2020. "An autoencoder and artificial neural network-based method to estimate parity status of wild mosquitoes from near-infrared spectra," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Daniel R Jeske, 2018. "Metrics Used When Evaluating the Performance of Statistical Classifiers," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 8(1), pages 7-9, August.
    11. Juliet Chebet Moso & Stéphane Cormier & Cyril de Runz & Hacène Fouchal & John Mwangi Wandeto, 2021. "Anomaly Detection on Data Streams for Smart Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Kajal Lahiri & Cheng Yang, 2023. "ROC and PRC Approaches to Evaluate Recession Forecasts," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 19(2), pages 119-148, September.
    13. Tzu-Hsuan Lin & Jehn-Ruey Jiang, 2021. "Credit Card Fraud Detection with Autoencoder and Probabilistic Random Forest," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Robert A. Blair & Nicholas Sambanis, 2021. "Is Theory Useful for Conflict Prediction? A Response to Beger, Morgan, and Ward," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(7-8), pages 1427-1453, August.
    15. Mieke Deschepper & Willem Waegeman & Dirk Vogelaers & Kristof Eeckloo, 2020. "Using structured pathology data to predict hospital-wide mortality at admission," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.
    16. Alfred Krzywicki & David Muchlinski & Benjamin E. Goldsmith & Arcot Sowmya, 2022. "From academia to policy makers: a methodology for real-time forecasting of infrequent events," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1489-1510, November.
    17. Aniruddha Gaikwad & Tammy Chang & Brian Giera & Nicholas Watkins & Saptarshi Mukherjee & Andrew Pascall & David Stobbe & Prahalada Rao, 2022. "In-process monitoring and prediction of droplet quality in droplet-on-demand liquid metal jetting additive manufacturing using machine learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(7), pages 2093-2117, October.
    18. Falco J. Bargagli-Dtoffi & Massimo Riccaboni & Armando Rungi, 2020. "Machine Learning for Zombie Hunting. Firms Failures and Financial Constraints," Working Papers 01/2020, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised Jun 2020.
    19. Marco Due~nas & V'ictor Ortiz & Massimo Riccaboni & Francesco Serti, 2021. "Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Trade: a Machine Learning Counterfactual Analysis," Papers 2104.04570, arXiv.org.
    20. Jianyuan Deng & Zhibo Yang & Hehe Wang & Iwao Ojima & Dimitris Samaras & Fusheng Wang, 2023. "A systematic study of key elements underlying molecular property prediction," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:34:y:2023:i:7:d:10.1007_s10845-022-01981-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.