IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v34y2023i3d10.1007_s10845-021-01835-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of link failures and recoveries on 6to4 tunneling network with different routing protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Neha Jain

    (USICT, GGSIPU)

  • Ashish Payal

    (USICT, GGSIPU)

  • Aarti Jain

    (NSUT)

Abstract

Failure recovery is an essential discussion in communication to guarantee the network's undisturbed and reliable service. Failed links have been affecting the communication network performance for various real-time applications for many years. Thus, it is necessary to address the issue, as it affects both users and service provider’s, leading to catastrophic collapse and cascading or interdependent failures. Therefore, designing a survivable network is the primary concern. Estimating and predicting network performance in advance for network survivability and traffic reachability is advantageous for network engineers. Therefore, in this paper, we analyze the network performance by failing and recovering network links for multiple time durations. The 6to4 tunneling network has been configured where two isolated IPv6 networks are connected through the tunnel's to the IPv4 backbone network, and we have failed the links that are connecting these networks. The 6to4 automatic and manual tunneling networks are defined separately. The network is simulated using Routing Information Protocol/Routing Information Protocol Next Generation and Open Shortest Path First/Open Shortest Path First version 3 for real-time voice and video streaming applications. The network's performance is calculated for links over each routing protocol and tunneling technique in these cases. Therefore, this analysis allows us the pre-computation of performance for failing the main link connecting the IPv6 networks to the IPv4 backbone network or vice-versa. The performance parameters studied and evaluated in this paper are network convergence, traffic dropped, throughput, queuing delay, and router performance. The different route table characteristics for Router A, Router C, and IPv4 backbone are also analyzed as links between them are failed and recovered multiple times. This novel analysis and discussion bring out a practical, realistic analysis of recovery and system vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Neha Jain & Ashish Payal & Aarti Jain, 2023. "Analysis of link failures and recoveries on 6to4 tunneling network with different routing protocol," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1037-1063, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:34:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01835-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01835-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-021-01835-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-021-01835-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kai Meng & Xiaoming Qian & Peihuang Lou & Jiong Zhang, 2020. "Smart recovery decision-making of used industrial equipment for sustainable manufacturing: belt lifter case study," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 183-197, January.
    2. Ercan Oztemel & Samet Gursev, 2020. "Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 127-182, January.
    3. Jing, Ke & Du, Xinru & Shen, Lixin & Tang, Liang, 2019. "Robustness of complex networks: Cascading failure mechanism by considering the characteristics of time delay and recovery strategy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).
    4. Shekhtman, Louis M. & Danziger, Michael M. & Havlin, Shlomo, 2016. "Recent advances on failure and recovery in networks of networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 28-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Tiago Afonso & Anabela C. Alves & Paula Carneiro, 2021. "Lean Thinking, Logistic and Ergonomics: Synergetic Triad to Prepare Shop Floor Work Systems to Face Pandemic Situations," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 62-76, December.
    3. Shuting Wang & Jie Meng & Yuanlong Xie & Liquan Jiang & Han Ding & Xinyu Shao, 2023. "Reference training system for intelligent manufacturing talent education: platform construction and curriculum development," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1125-1164, March.
    4. Xiaoyu Zhan & Delia Mioara Popescu & Valentin Radu, 2020. "Challenges for Romanian Entrepreneurs in Managing Remote Workers," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Marcin Waldemar STANIEWSKI & Valentina VASILE & Adriana Grigorescu (ed.), International Conference Innovative Business Management & Global Entrepreneurship (IBMAGE 2020), edition 1, volume 14, chapter 49, pages 670-687, Editura Lumen.
    5. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    6. Rui Wang & Xiangyu Guo & Shisheng Zhong & Gaolei Peng & Lin Wang, 2022. "Decision rule mining for machining method chains based on rough set theory," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 799-807, March.
    7. Pompeu Casanovas & Louis de Koker & Mustafa Hashmi, 2022. "Law, Socio-Legal Governance, the Internet of Things, and Industry 4.0: A Middle-Out/Inside-Out Approach," J, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-28, January.
    8. Anna Kwiotkowska & Radosław Wolniak & Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Gębczyńska, 2022. "Configurational Paths of Leadership Competency Shortages and 4.0 Leadership Effectiveness: An fs/QCA Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Xia, Weifu & Wang, Yanhui & Hao, Yucheng & He, Zhichao & Yan, Kai & Zhao, Fan, 2024. "Reliability analysis for complex electromechanical multi-state systems utilizing universal generating function techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    10. Masoud Zafarzadeh & Magnus Wiktorsson & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Technologies for Data-Driven Production Logistics: Their Role from a Holistic and Value Creation Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, April.
    11. Özköse, Hakan & Güney, Gül, 2023. "The effects of industry 4.0 on productivity: A scientific mapping study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    12. Peerally, Jahan Ara & Santiago, Fernando & De Fuentes, Claudia & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh, 2022. "Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    13. Iñigo Flores Ituarte & Suraj Panicker & Hari P. N. Nagarajan & Eric Coatanea & David W. Rosen, 2023. "Optimisation-driven design to explore and exploit the process–structure–property–performance linkages in digital manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 219-241, January.
    14. Qinglan Liu & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Miying Yang & Janaina Mascarenhas, 2022. "A framework of digital technologies for the circular economy: Digital functions and mechanisms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2171-2192, July.
    15. Liangjie Xia & Yongwan Bai & Sanjoy Ghose & Juanjuan Qin, 2022. "Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 257-292, March.
    16. Szymon Cyfert & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Maciej Zastempowski, 2021. "Impact of Management Tools Supporting Industry 4.0 on the Importance of CSR during COVID-19. Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    17. Davood Shiri & Vahid Akbari, 2021. "Online Failure Diagnosis in Interdependent Networks," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-14, March.
    18. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    19. Jin, Kun & Wang, Wei & Li, Xinran & Chen, Siyuan & Qin, Shaoyang & Hua, Xuedong, 2023. "Cascading failure in urban rail transit network considering demand variation and time delay," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 630(C).
    20. Kyu Tae Park & Jinho Yang & Sang Do Noh, 2021. "VREDI: virtual representation for a digital twin application in a work-center-level asset administration shell," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 501-544, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:34:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-021-01835-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.