IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v33y2022i3d10.1007_s10845-020-01665-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A prediction approach of SLM based on the ensemble of metamodels considering material efficiency, energy consumption, and tensile strength

Author

Listed:
  • Jingchang Li

    (Huazhong University of Science & Technology)

  • Longchao Cao

    (Huazhong University of Science & Technology
    Huazhong University of Science & Technology)

  • Jiexiang Hu

    (Huazhong University of Science & Technology
    Huazhong University of Science & Technology)

  • Minhua Sheng

    (Huazhong University of Science & Technology)

  • Qi Zhou

    (Huazhong University of Science & Technology)

  • Peng Jin

    (Huazhong University of Science & Technology)

Abstract

As a rapid developing additive manufacturing (AM) technology, selective laser melting (SLM) provides a promising way for intelligent manufacturing. The SLM part quality depends largely on the process parameters in the manufacturing process. Therefore, understanding the relationships between the input process parameters and the output part performances is critical to improve the part quality. In this work, the ensemble of metamodels (EM) is adopted and an adaptive hybrid leave-one-out error-based EM (EM-AHL) is developed to predict the powder utilization rate, the energy consumption, and the tensile strength of the as-built parts. First, the Taguchi experiment design is applied to obtain the sample points and the corresponding SLM experiments are conducted to get the experimental results. Second, the correlations between the process parameters (i.e., laser power, layer thickness, scanning speed) and the three responses are fitted using the proposed EM-AHL, which is constructed by aggregating three metamodels, Kriging, Radial basis fuction (RBF), and Support vector regression (SVR), according to the local measures. Finally, K-fold cross-validation and additional experiments validation methods are adopted to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the proposed EM-AHL. Results illustrate that the proposed EM-AHL not only outperforms the stand-alone metamodels but also provides more accurate results than the EM constructed by global measures (EM-G). Among the three prediction objectives, the prediction accuracy of the proposed EM-AHL has improved by up to 20% compared to the stand-alone metamodels. Besides, the main effects and contribution rates of process parameters on the responses are analyzed. Overall, the proposed EM-AHL method exhibits the excellent capability of guiding the actual SLM manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingchang Li & Longchao Cao & Jiexiang Hu & Minhua Sheng & Qi Zhou & Peng Jin, 2022. "A prediction approach of SLM based on the ensemble of metamodels considering material efficiency, energy consumption, and tensile strength," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 687-702, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:33:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01665-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01665-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01665-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-020-01665-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qi Zhou & Youmin Rong & Xinyu Shao & Ping Jiang & Zhongmei Gao & Longchao Cao, 2018. "Optimization of laser brazing onto galvanized steel based on ensemble of metamodels," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1417-1431, October.
    2. Masoumeh Aminzadeh & Thomas R. Kurfess, 2019. "Online quality inspection using Bayesian classification in powder-bed additive manufacturing from high-resolution visual camera images," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2505-2523, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Ren & Qian Wang, 2022. "Gaussian-process based modeling and optimal control of melt-pool geometry in laser powder bed fusion," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 2239-2256, December.
    2. Chunyang Xia & Zengxi Pan & Joseph Polden & Huijun Li & Yanling Xu & Shanben Chen, 2022. "Modelling and prediction of surface roughness in wire arc additive manufacturing using machine learning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1467-1482, June.
    3. Tamie Takeda Yokoyama & Satie Ledoux Takeda-Berger & Marco Aurélio Oliveira & Andre Hideto Futami & Luiz Veriano Oliveira Dalla Valentina & Enzo Morosini Frazzon, 2023. "Bayesian networks as a guide to value stream mapping for lean office implementation: a proposed framework," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 49-79, March.
    4. Deyuan Ma & Ping Jiang & Leshi Shu & Zhaoliang Gong & Yilin Wang & Shaoning Geng, 2024. "Online porosity prediction in laser welding of aluminum alloys based on a multi-fidelity deep learning framework," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-73, January.
    5. Paromita Nath & Sankaran Mahadevan, 2023. "Probabilistic predictive control of porosity in laser powder bed fusion," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1085-1103, March.
    6. Osama Aljarrah & Jun Li & Alfa Heryudono & Wenzhen Huang & Jing Bi, 2023. "Predicting part distortion field in additive manufacturing: a data-driven framework," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 1975-1993, April.
    7. Cheng Yan & Jianfeng Zhu & Xiuli Shen & Jun Fan & Dong Mi & Zhengming Qian, 2020. "Ensemble of Regression-Type and Interpolation-Type Metamodels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Yilin Guo & Wen Feng Lu & Jerry Ying Hsi Fuh, 2021. "Semi-supervised deep learning based framework for assessing manufacturability of cellular structures in direct metal laser sintering process," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 347-359, February.
    9. Jingchang Li & Qi Zhou & Xufeng Huang & Menglei Li & Longchao Cao, 2023. "In situ quality inspection with layer-wise visual images based on deep transfer learning during selective laser melting," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 853-867, February.
    10. Ying Zhang & Mutahar Safdar & Jiarui Xie & Jinghao Li & Manuel Sage & Yaoyao Fiona Zhao, 2023. "A systematic review on data of additive manufacturing for machine learning applications: the data quality, type, preprocessing, and management," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(8), pages 3305-3340, December.
    11. Vivek Mahato & Muhannad Ahmed Obeidi & Dermot Brabazon & Pádraig Cunningham, 2022. "Detecting voids in 3D printing using melt pool time series data," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 845-852, March.
    12. Wangwang Huang & Xuesong Mei & Gedong Jiang & Dongxiang Hou & Yifei Bi & Yuyan Wang, 2022. "An on-machine tool path generation method based on hybrid and local point cloud registration for laser deburring of ceramic cores," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(8), pages 2223-2238, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:33:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01665-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.