IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v32y2021i3d10.1007_s10845-020-01592-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

End-of-life product disassembly with priority-based extraction of dangerous parts

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Dalle Mura

    (University of Pisa)

  • Francesco Pistolesi

    (University of Pisa)

  • Gino Dini

    (University of Pisa)

  • Beatrice Lazzerini

    (University of Pisa)

Abstract

The amount of electronic waste generated in the world is impressive. The USA alone yearly throw away 9.4 million tons of electronic devices: only 12.5% is recycled. One way to reduce this massive impact on the environment is to disassemble these devices with the aim of reusing and recycling as many parts as possible. Disassembling end-of-life products is a complex industrial process that may pose workers at risk because some parts of the product may contain dangerous materials. It is thus crucial to design efficient, sustainable and secure disassembly lines. This paper presents a multi-objective formulation of the Disassembly Line Balancing Problem (DLBP) which promotes efficiency and includes a new objective that increases the level of safety. The efficiency is guaranteed by balancing the idle times of the workstations, and by maximizing the profit and the level of feasibility of a disassembly sequence, which means disassembling the product as much as possible. Safety is maximized by extracting each dangerous part with a priority that is higher the more dangerous the part is. The most dangerous parts can thus be quickly removed from the product, thereby eliminating the exposure to the greatest risks. The disassembly continues with the execution of the tasks that remove the parts that are gradually less dangerous. Along with the DLBP formulation, this paper presents a genetic algorithm purposely designed to solve the problem. Two real-world case studies are discussed which entail the disassembly of a TV monitor and an air conditioner.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Dalle Mura & Francesco Pistolesi & Gino Dini & Beatrice Lazzerini, 2021. "End-of-life product disassembly with priority-based extraction of dangerous parts," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 837-854, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01592-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01592-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-020-01592-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-020-01592-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Can B. Kalayci & Olcay Polat & Surendra M. Gupta, 2016. "A hybrid genetic algorithm for sequence-dependent disassembly line balancing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 321-354, July.
    2. Kalyanmoy Deb & Kalyanmoy Deb, 2014. "Multi-objective Optimization," Springer Books, in: Edmund K. Burke & Graham Kendall (ed.), Search Methodologies, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 403-449, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zepeng Chen & Lin Li & Xiaojing Chu & Fengfu Yin & Huaqing Li, 2024. "Multi-Objective Disassembly Depth Optimization for End-of-Life Smartphones Considering the Overall Safety of the Disassembly Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Nondy, J. & Gogoi, T.K., 2021. "Performance comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for exergetic and exergoenvironomic optimization of a benchmark combined heat and power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Xuhui Xia & Wei Liu & Zelin Zhang & Lei Wang & Jianhua Cao & Xiang Liu, 2019. "A Balancing Method of Mixed-model Disassembly Line in Random Working Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Smedberg, Henrik & Bandaru, Sunith, 2023. "Interactive knowledge discovery and knowledge visualization for decision support in multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1311-1329.
    5. Macias, A. & Kandidayeni, M. & Boulon, L. & Trovão, J.P., 2021. "Fuel cell-supercapacitor topologies benchmark for a three-wheel electric vehicle powertrain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Zhang, Xinyue & Guo, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Xingping, 2023. "Bidding modes for renewable energy considering electricity-carbon integrated market mechanism based on multi-agent hybrid game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    7. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    8. Liu, Kanglin & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2018. "Capacitated disassembly scheduling under stochastic yield and demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 244-257.
    9. Li, Mengjia & Li, Fangfang & Qiu, Jun & Zhou, Han & Wang, Hongru & Lu, Houliang & Zhang, Nan & Song, Zhengyu, 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of non-fossil energy structure in China towards the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    10. Nondy, J. & Gogoi, T.K., 2022. "Tri-objective optimization of two recuperative gas turbine-based CCHP systems and 4E analyses at optimal conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    11. Esteves, Elisa M.M. & Brigagão, George V. & Morgado, Cláudia R.V., 2021. "Multi-objective optimization of integrated crop-livestock system for biofuels production: A life-cycle approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    12. Ziyan Zhao & Pengkai Xiao & Jiacun Wang & Shixin Liu & Xiwang Guo & Shujin Qin & Ying Tang, 2023. "Improved Brain-Storm Optimizer for Disassembly Line Balancing Problems Considering Hazardous Components and Task Switching Time," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Velásquez, Laura & Posada, Alejandro & Chica, Edwin, 2023. "Surrogate modeling method for multi-objective optimization of the inlet channel and the basin of a gravitational water vortex hydraulic turbine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    14. van Schilt, Isabelle M. & van Kalker, Jonna & Lefter, Iulia & Kwakkel, Jan H. & Verbraeck, Alexander, 2024. "Buffer scheduling for improving on-time performance and connectivity with a multi-objective simulation–optimization model: A proof of concept for the airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Jia Liu & Shuwei Wang, 2017. "Balancing Disassembly Line in Product Recovery to Promote the Coordinated Development of Economy and Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    16. Haywood, Adam B. & Lunday, Brian J. & Robbins, Matthew J. & Pachter, Meir N., 2022. "The weighted intruder path covering problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 347-358.
    17. Wegel, Sebastian & Ivanov, Anton & Lenz, Ralf & Volling, Thomas, 2024. "Scheduling of parallel continuous annealing lines with alternative processing modes to optimize efficiency under tardiness constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 282-294.
    18. Ming Liu & Xin Liu & Maoran Zhu & Feifeng Zheng, 2019. "Stochastic Drone Fleet Deployment and Planning Problem Considering Multiple-Type Delivery Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Sadeghi, Mohammad & Yaghoubi, Saeed, 2024. "Optimization models for cloud seeding network design and operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1146-1167.
    20. Junkai He & Feng Chu & Feifeng Zheng & Ming Liu, 2021. "A green-oriented bi-objective disassembly line balancing problem with stochastic task processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 71-93, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:32:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s10845-020-01592-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.