IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v30y2019i4d10.1007_s10845-017-1353-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-phase sequential preventive maintenance scheduling for deteriorating repairable systems

Author

Listed:
  • Chaoqun Duan

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    University of Toronto)

  • Chao Deng

    (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)

  • Bingran Wang

    (University of Toronto)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a novel multi-phase sequential preventive maintenance (PM) model with multiple maintenance objectives for repairable mechanical systems under deterioration. Although sequential PM scheduling has appeared in literature, conventionally the length of time between maintenance events in the later of replacement process changes very frequently, which has led to poor operability in practice, and has consequently brought a great challenge for maintenance managers. To solve this problem, the concept of multiple phases sequential PM, in which the replacement cycle is divided into several phases, each with equal PM intervals, is proposed to make the policy more suitable in practical applications. A new relationship between cost and maintenance quality, which considers the age reduction factor as a function of maintenance cost and system age, is established to describe the effect of maintenance. The maintenance modeling and optimizing problems are formulated using a multi-attribute value model (MAVM) and a computation algorithm is presented to find the optimum solution. A case study of examining equipment is presented to illustrate the performance of the proposed policy. A comparison with other methods is given to illustrate the effectiveness of our approach. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is performed on the optimality of the maintenance schedule based on related parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaoqun Duan & Chao Deng & Bingran Wang, 2019. "Multi-phase sequential preventive maintenance scheduling for deteriorating repairable systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1779-1793, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-017-1353-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-017-1353-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-017-1353-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-017-1353-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Chang, Wei-Chen & Li, Wei-Hao & Lin, Zu-Liang, 2013. "Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 462-469.
    2. Kijima, Masaaki & Morimura, Hidenori & Suzuki, Yasusuke, 1988. "Periodical replacement problem without assuming minimal repair," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 194-203, November.
    3. Doostparast, Mohammad & Kolahan, Farhad & Doostparast, Mahdi, 2014. "A reliability-based approach to optimize preventive maintenance scheduling for coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 98-106.
    4. Daming Lin & Ming J. Zuo & Richard C. M. Yam, 2001. "Sequential imperfect preventive maintenance models with two categories of failure modes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 172-183, March.
    5. Wu, Shaomin & Clements-Croome, Derek, 2005. "Preventive maintenance models with random maintenance quality," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 99-105.
    6. Scarf, Philip A., 1997. "On the application of mathematical models in maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 493-506, June.
    7. Veber, B. & Nagode, M. & Fajdiga, M., 2008. "Generalized renewal process for repairable systems based on finite Weibull mixture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(10), pages 1461-1472.
    8. Khatab, A. & Aghezzaf, E.-H., 2016. "Selective maintenance optimization when quality of imperfect maintenance actions are stochastic," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 182-189.
    9. Maxim Finkelstein, 2008. "Failure Rate Modelling for Reliability and Risk," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84800-986-8, July.
    10. Pham, Hoang & Wang, Hongzhou, 1996. "Imperfect maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 425-438, November.
    11. Dao, Cuong D. & Zuo, Ming J. & Pandey, Mayank, 2014. "Selective maintenance for multi-state series–parallel systems under economic dependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 240-249.
    12. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    13. Richard Cassady, C. & Paul Murdock, W. & Pohl, Edward A., 2001. "Selective maintenance for support equipment involving multiple maintenance actions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 252-258, March.
    14. Zhou, Xiaojun & Xi, Lifeng & Lee, Jay, 2007. "Reliability-centered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(4), pages 530-534.
    15. Ormerod, Richard J. & Ulrich, Werner, 2013. "Operational research and ethics: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(2), pages 291-307.
    16. A H Christer, 1999. "Developments in delay time analysis for modelling plant maintenance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(11), pages 1120-1137, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Jin, Hua & Liu, Shuang, 2021. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule incorporating delay time theory with imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Kui Wang & Chao Deng & Lili Ding, 2020. "Optimal Condition-Based Maintenance Strategy for Multi-Component Systems under Degradation Failures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chaabane, K. & Khatab, A. & Diallo, C. & Aghezzaf, E.-H. & Venkatadri, U., 2020. "Integrated imperfect multimission selective maintenance and repairpersons assignment problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Jiang, Tao & Liu, Yu, 2020. "Selective maintenance strategy for systems executing multiple consecutive missions with uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Liu, Yu & Chen, Yiming & Jiang, Tao, 2020. "Dynamic selective maintenance optimization for multi-state systems over a finite horizon: A deep reinforcement learning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 166-181.
    4. Lin, Zu-Liang & Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Fang, Chih-Chiang, 2015. "Non-periodic preventive maintenance with reliability thresholds for complex repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 145-156.
    5. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    6. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    7. Ait Mokhtar, El Hassene & Laggoune, Radouane & Chateauneuf, Alaa, 2023. "Imperfect maintenance modeling and assessment of repairable multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    8. Shahraki, Ameneh Forouzandeh & Yadav, Om Prakash & Vogiatzis, Chrysafis, 2020. "Selective maintenance optimization for multi-state systems considering stochastically dependent components and stochastic imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Jingyi Zhao & Chunhai Gao & Tao Tang, 2022. "A Review of Sustainable Maintenance Strategies for Single Component and Multicomponent Equipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Liu, Yu & Chen, Yiming & Jiang, Tao, 2018. "On sequence planning for selective maintenance of multi-state systems under stochastic maintenance durations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 113-127.
    11. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2015. "Decline and repair, and covariate effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 219-226.
    12. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    13. Kurt, Murat & Kharoufeh, Jeffrey P., 2010. "Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 368-380, September.
    14. Ming-Yi You & Guang Meng, 2012. "A modularized framework for predictive maintenance scheduling," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(4), pages 380-391, August.
    15. P-E Labeau & M-C Segovia, 2011. "Effective age models for imperfect maintenance," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 117-130, June.
    16. You, Ming-Yi & Li, Hongguang & Meng, Guang, 2011. "Control-limit preventive maintenance policies for components subject to imperfect preventive maintenance and variable operational conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(5), pages 590-598.
    17. Wenbin Cao & Xisheng Jia & Yu Liu & Qiwei Hu & Jianmin Zhao, 2019. "Selective maintenance optimisation considering random common cause failures and imperfect maintenance," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(3), pages 427-443, June.
    18. Sergey S. Ketkov & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Lisa M. Maillart, 2023. "Planning of life-depleting preventive maintenance activities with replacements," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1461-1483, May.
    19. Liu, Lujie & Yang, Jun & Kong, Xuefeng & Xiao, Yiyong, 2022. "Multi-mission selective maintenance and repairpersons assignment problem with stochastic durations," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    20. Wang, Wenbin, 2011. "An inspection model based on a three-stage failure process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 838-848.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:30:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10845-017-1353-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.