IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v93y2008i10p1461-1472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalized renewal process for repairable systems based on finite Weibull mixture

Author

Listed:
  • Veber, B.
  • Nagode, M.
  • Fajdiga, M.

Abstract

Repairable systems can be brought to one of possible states following a repair. These states are: ‘as good as new’, ‘as bad as old’ and ‘better than old but worse than new’. The probabilistic models traditionally used to estimate the expected number of failures account for the first two states, but they do not properly apply to the last one, which is more realistic in practice. In this paper, a probabilistic model that is applicable to all of the three after-repair states, called generalized renewal process (GRP), is applied. Simplistically, GRP addresses the repair assumption by introducing the concept of virtual age into the stochastic point processes to enable them to represent the full spectrum of repair assumptions. The shape of measured or design life distributions of systems can vary considerably, and therefore frequently cannot be approximated by simple distribution functions. The scope of the paper is to prove that a finite Weibull mixture, with positive component weights only, can be used as underlying distribution of the time to first failure (TTFF) of the GRP model, on condition that the unknown parameters can be estimated. To support the main idea, three examples are presented. In order to estimate the unknown parameters of the GRP model with m-fold Weibull mixture, the EM algorithm is applied. The GRP model with m mixture components distributions is compared to the standard GRP model based on two-parameter Weibull distribution by calculating the expected number of failures. It can be concluded that the suggested GRP model with Weibull mixture with an arbitrary but finite number of components is suitable for predicting failures based on the past performance of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Veber, B. & Nagode, M. & Fajdiga, M., 2008. "Generalized renewal process for repairable systems based on finite Weibull mixture," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(10), pages 1461-1472.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:10:p:1461-1472
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.10.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832007002499
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2007.10.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang, Duo & He, Zhen & He, Shuguang, 2016. "Warranty claims forecasting based on a general imperfect repair model considering usage rate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 147-154.
    2. Li, Li & Hanson, Timothy E., 2014. "A Bayesian semiparametric regression model for reliability data using effective age," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 177-188.
    3. Franko, Mitja & Nagode, Marko, 2015. "Probability density function of the equivalent stress amplitude using statistical transformation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 118-125.
    4. Asadi, Majid & Ebrahimi, Nader & Soofi, Ehsan S. & Zohrevand, Younes, 2016. "Jensen–Shannon information of the coherent system lifetime," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 244-255.
    5. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    6. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2014. "Application of reliability models with covariates in spare part prediction and optimization – A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-7.
    7. Carlos Parra & Adolfo Crespo & Fredy Kristjanpoller & Pablo Viveros, 2012. "Stochastic model of reliability for use in the evaluation of the economic impact of a failure using life cycle cost analysis. Case studies on the rail freight and oil industries," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 226(4), pages 392-405, August.
    8. Zantek, Paul F. & Hanson, Timothy & Damien, Paul & Popova, Elmira, 2015. "A decision dependent stochastic process model for repairable systems with applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 73-80.
    9. Nguyen, Thi Anh Tuyet & Chou, Shuo-Yan, 2019. "Improved maintenance optimization of offshore wind systems considering effects of government subsidies, lost production and discounted cost model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Chaoqun Duan & Chao Deng & Bingran Wang, 2019. "Multi-phase sequential preventive maintenance scheduling for deteriorating repairable systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1779-1793, April.
    11. Remy, Emmanuel & Corset, Franck & Despréaux, Stéphane & Doyen, Laurent & Gaudoin, Olivier, 2013. "An example of integrated approach to technical and economic optimization of maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 8-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:93:y:2008:i:10:p:1461-1472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.