IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joinma/v29y2018i5d10.1007_s10845-015-1159-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intelligent information sharing among manufacturers in supply networks: supplier selection case

Author

Listed:
  • Hyesung Seok

    (Hongik University)

  • Shimon Y. Nof

    (Purdue University)

Abstract

Decision making in highly distributed supply networks has become more complex in globally dynamic markets. Despite extensive previous work on supply network decisions, it is still necessary to develop advanced tools for selective collection, management, and sharing of relevant information. In this research, a new intelligent, distributed, and autonomous information sharing protocol is modelled and applied to analytically determine supplier information sharing among manufacturers. Information sharing with all manufacturers is neither sensible nor realistic, since it requires high communication/implementation costs and cannot guarantee a positive return to all parties. Our Intelligent Supplier Information Sharing (ISIS) protocol supports each manufacturer’s decision-making process on selective information sharing. It does so by analyzing the expected sharing benefit while estimating the value of other parties’ information. Through a negotiation process, the appropriate price for shared information that each manufacturer has to pay is also determined. Numerical examples illustrate the performance of the ISIS protocol. Compared to no sharing and complete sharing of information, selective sharing recommended by ISIS yields relatively higher profits. For the case analyzed, profit increase by ISIS is, on average, 15.5 % higher than with complete information sharing, and this advantage holds even under changing conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyesung Seok & Shimon Y. Nof, 2018. "Intelligent information sharing among manufacturers in supply networks: supplier selection case," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1097-1113, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1159-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1159-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-015-1159-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10845-015-1159-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hau L. Lee & Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang, 2000. "The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 626-643, May.
    2. Boray Huang & Seyed M. R. Iravani, 2005. "Production Control Policies in Supply Chains with Selective-Information Sharing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 662-674, August.
    3. Nadege Troussier & Farouk Belkadi & Benoit Eynard & Mourad Messaadia & Thierry Gidel, 2010. "Supplier-oriented and product life cycle management framework to support virtual organisations," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 49-66.
    4. Rashmi Jain & Anithashree Chandrasekaran & Ozgur Erol, 2010. "A framework for end-to-end approach to Systems Integration," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 79-109.
    5. Srinagesh Gavirneni & Roman Kapuscinski & Sridhar Tayur, 1999. "Value of Information in Capacitated Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 16-24, January.
    6. Ceroni, Jose A. & Matsui, Masayuki & Y. Nof, Shimon, 1999. "Communication-based coordination modeling in distributed manufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 281-287, April.
    7. Li, Gang & Yang, Hongjiao & Sun, Linyan & Sohal, Amrik S., 2009. "The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 125-138, July.
    8. Raghunathan, Srinivasan, 2003. "Impact of demand correlation on the value of and incentives for information sharing in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 634-649, May.
    9. Hokey Min & Wen-Bin 'Vincent' Yu, 2008. "Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment: demand planning in supply chain management," International Journal of Information Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 4-20.
    10. Umble, Elisabeth J. & Haft, Ronald R. & Umble, M. Michael, 2003. "Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 241-257, April.
    11. Yao, Dong-Qing & Yue, Xiaohang & Liu, John, 2008. "Vertical cost information sharing in a supply chain with value-adding retailers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 838-851, October.
    12. Seok, Hyesung & Nof, Shimon Y., 2014. "Dynamic coalition reformation for adaptive demand and capacity sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 136-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sunghee Lee & Jinsoo Park, 2021. "How Switching Costs with Process Monitoring and Operational Integration Affect Sustainable Supplier Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Wattana Viriyasitavat & Li Xu & Zhuming Bi & Assadaporn Sapsomboon, 2020. "Blockchain-based business process management (BPM) framework for service composition in industry 4.0," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(7), pages 1737-1748, October.
    3. Sena Aydoğan & Gül E. Okudan Kremer & Diyar Akay, 2021. "Linguistic summarization to support supply network decisions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1573-1586, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sohn, So Young & Lim, Michael, 2008. "The effect of forecasting and information sharing in SCM for multi-generation products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 276-287, April.
    2. Xie, Jinxing & Zhou, Deming & Wei, Jerry C. & Zhao, Xiande, 2010. "Price discount based on early order commitment in a single manufacturer-multiple retailer supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 368-376, January.
    3. M M Ali & J E Boylan, 2011. "Feasibility principles for Downstream Demand Inference in supply chains," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(3), pages 474-482, March.
    4. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Li Zheng, 2020. "Value of information sharing in a multiple producers–distributor supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 285(1), pages 121-148, February.
    5. Li, Tian & Zhang, Hongtao, 2015. "Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    6. Agrawal, Sunil & Sengupta, Raghu Nandan & Shanker, Kripa, 2009. "Impact of information sharing and lead time on bullwhip effect and on-hand inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 576-593, January.
    7. Sari, Kazim, 2010. "Exploring the impacts of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology on supply chain performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 174-183, November.
    8. Brian Mittendorf & Jiwoong Shin & Dae-Hee Yoon, 2013. "Manufacturer marketing initiatives and retailer information sharing," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 263-287, June.
    9. Kaijie Zhu & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2004. "Modeling the Benefits of Sharing Future Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 136-147, February.
    10. Kevin H. Shang & Sean X. Zhou & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2010. "Improving Supply Chain Performance: Real-Time Demand Information and Flexible Deliveries," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 430-448, May.
    11. Sven Axsäter & Johan Marklund, 2008. "Optimal Position-Based Warehouse Ordering in Divergent Two-Echelon Inventory Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 976-991, August.
    12. Yue, Xiaohang & Liu, John, 2006. "Demand forecast sharing in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 646-667, October.
    13. Ketzenberg, Michael & Oliva, Rogelio & Wang, Yimin & Webster, Scott, 2023. "Retailer inventory data sharing in a fresh product supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 680-693.
    14. İsmail Bakal & Nesim Erkip & Refik Güllü, 2011. "Value of supplier’s capacity information in a two-echelon supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 115-135, November.
    15. Vishal Gaur & Avi Giloni & Sridhar Seshadri, 2005. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain Under ARMA Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(6), pages 961-969, June.
    16. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Wu, Cheng-Han & Huang, Ya-Jing, 2008. "Ordering and pricing decisions in a two-echelon supply chain with asymmetric demand information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 509-525, October.
    17. Yumi Lee & Sang Hwa Song & Taesu Cheong, 2018. "The value of supply chain coordination under moral hazard: A case study of the consumer product supply chain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Yossi Aviv, 2003. "A Time-Series Framework for Supply-Chain Inventory Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 210-227, April.
    19. Brian Mittendorf & Jiwoong Shin & Dae-Hee Yoon, 2013. "Manufacturer marketing initiatives and retailer information sharing," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 263-287, June.
    20. Sabitha, Devarajulu & Rajendran, Chandrasekharan & Kalpakam, S. & Ziegler, Hans, 2016. "The value of information sharing in a serial supply chain with AR(1) demand and non-zero replenishment lead times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 758-777.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joinma:v:29:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s10845-015-1159-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.