IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joiaen/v11y2022i1d10.1186_s13731-022-00202-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The construct and predictive validity testing of Indonesian entrepreneurial competence inventory-situational judgment test model

Author

Listed:
  • Benedicta Prihatin Dwi Riyanti

    (Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia)

  • Angela Oktavia Suryani

    (Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia)

  • Christine Winstinindah Sandroto

    (Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia)

  • Silverius Y. Soeharso

    (Pancasila University)

Abstract

This research aimed to test the internal and external validity of the Indonesian Entrepreneurial Competence Inventory constructed based on the situational judgment test (SJT) model. Spencer's entrepreneurial competence theory and interviews with entrepreneurs were employed to build the items. The internal construct validity was tested by applying confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In contrast, the external construct validity was tested by implementing correlations with other tests that were theoretically correlated with entrepreneurial competency, namely, the previous entrepreneurial competence (Likert-scale model) and risk behavior. The predictive validity was analyzed using correlation testing with an instrument assessing balanced scorecard measurement of entrepreneurial achievement. A sample of 149 entrepreneurs from industrial cities in Indonesia was recruited via convenience sampling. The CFA analyses showed that nine dimensions of the Indonesian Entrepreneurial Competencies Inventory were valid. In the correlation testing with risk-taking behavior and business success, all dimensions were significantly valid, except the see and act on opportunity dimension. However, in the correlation with the previous entrepreneurial competence scale, a significant correlation was found only with a commitment to work. In further analysis, the correlation between dimensions of the current inventory and dimensions of the previous scale showed significant correlations between the competence of seeing opportunity and commitment to work, assertiveness, and persuasion. The impact to the future research and practice application were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Benedicta Prihatin Dwi Riyanti & Angela Oktavia Suryani & Christine Winstinindah Sandroto & Silverius Y. Soeharso, 2022. "The construct and predictive validity testing of Indonesian entrepreneurial competence inventory-situational judgment test model," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:11:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-022-00202-x
    DOI: 10.1186/s13731-022-00202-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s13731-022-00202-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s13731-022-00202-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marvin Soderberg & Suresh Kalagnanam & Norman T. Sheehan & Ganesh Vaidyanathan, 2011. "When is a balanced scorecard a balanced scorecard?," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 60(7), pages 688-708, September.
    2. Sascha Kraus & William McDowell & Domingo Enrique Ribeiro-Soriano & María Rodríguez-García, 2021. "The role of innovation and knowledge for entrepreneurship and regional development," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3-4), pages 175-184, March.
    3. Jasna Auer Antoncic & Bostjan Antoncic & Matjaz Gantar & Robert D. Hisrich & Lawrence J. Marks & Alexandre A. Bachkirov & Zhaoyang Li & Pierre Polzin & Jose L. Borges & Antonio Coelho & Marja-Liisa Ka, 2018. "Risk-Taking Propensity and Entrepreneurship: The Role of Power Distance," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(01), pages 1-26, March.
    4. Labib Arafeh, 2016. "An entrepreneurial key competencies’ model," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Mansia Sadyrova & Kuanish Yusupov & Bibigul Imanbekova, 2021. "Innovation processes in Kazakhstan: development factors," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Irene B.N.O., 2017. "A Cross-cultural Assessment of the Competency Needs of Women Operating in the Context of SMMEs in South Africa," Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 20-30, January.
    7. Marvin Soderberg & Suresh Kalagnanam & Norman T. Sheehan & Ganesh Vaidyanathan, 2011. "When is a balanced scorecard a balanced scorecard?," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 60(7), pages 688-708, September.
    8. Zhaoyang Guo & Wei Jiang, 2020. "Risk-taking for entrepreneurial new entry: risk-taking dimensions and contingencies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 739-781, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ninik Sri Rahayu & Masduki & E. R. Nur Ellyanawati, 2023. "Women entrepreneurs’ struggles during the COVID-19 pandemic and their use of social media," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Marvello Yang & Norizan Jaafar & Abdullah Al Mamun & Anas A. Salameh & Noorshella Che Nawi, 2022. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dag Øivind Madsen & Blerim Azizi & Albert Rushiti & Tonny Stenheim, 2019. "The Diffusion and Implementation of the Balanced Scorecard in the Norwegian Municipality Sector: A Descriptive Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-31, May.
    2. Irawan Nurhas & Stefan Geisler & Jan Pawlowski, 2022. "An intergenerational competency framework: Competencies for knowledge sustainability and start‐up development in the digital age," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1733-1748, December.
    3. Azizi, Mohammad & Salmani Bidgoli, Masoud & Maley, Jane F. & Dabić, Marina, 2022. "A stewardship perspective in family firms: A new perspective for altruism and social capital," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 764-775.
    4. Nurzhan DEMEUOV & Ainur ISSAYEVA & Ardak YESDAULETOVA, 2024. "Investment Policy Of The Republic Of Kazakhstan: Main Directions And Development Trends," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 24(1), pages 19-36.
    5. Chan Yang & Xiaogang He & Xiaoyan Wang & Jinjun Nie, 2022. "The Influence of Family Social Status on Farmer Entrepreneurship: Empirical Analysis Based on Thousand Villages Survey in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Qigang Yuan & Yongsheng Ji & Wei Zhang & Ting Lei, 2024. "Cross-Border E-Commerce and Urban Entrepreneurial Vitality—A Quasi-Natural Experiment Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Iqra Sadaf Khan & Osmo Kauppila & Noureen Fatima & Jukka Majava, 2022. "Stakeholder interdependencies in a collaborative innovation project," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Yuanyuan Chen & Wei Liu & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal, 2024. "Transferring Scientific Knowledge to Academic Startups: the Moderating Effect of the Dual Identity of Academic Entrepreneurs on Forming Knowledge Depth and Knowledge Breadth," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1823-1844, March.
    9. Robert M. Yawson & Amy K. B. Paros, 2023. "Systems Perspective of the Use of the Balanced Scorecard for Organization Development and Change," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    10. Madsen, Dag Øivind & Stenheim, Tonny, 2014. "Balansert målstyring: En kort oversikt over forskningslitteraturen [The Balanced Scorecard: A brief overview of the research literature]," MPRA Paper 65991, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge, 2018. "Why Architecture Does Not Matter: On the Fallacy of Sustainability Balanced Scorecards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 919-935, July.
    12. Muhammad Rafiq & Saif Maqbool & José Moleiro Martins & Mário Nuno Mata & Rui Miguel Dantas & Shumaila Naz & Anabela Batista Correia, 2021. "A Study on Balanced Scorecard and Its Impact on Sustainable Development of Renewable Energy Organizations; A Mediating Role of Political and Regulatory Institutions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Rafał Kusa & Marcin Suder & Belem Barbosa & Beata Glinka & Joanna Duda, 2022. "Entrepreneurial behaviors that shape performance in small family and non-family hotels during times of crisis," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 1545-1575, December.
    14. Rosalia Castellano & Gaetano Musella & Gennaro Punzo, 2023. "Does context matter? Exploring the effects of productive structures on the relationship between innovation and workforce skills’ complementarity," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1991-2011, June.
    15. Luc Phan Tan & Lan Xuan Pham & Trang Thanh Bui, 2021. "Personality Traits and Social Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Desirability and Perceived Feasibility," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 30(1), pages 56-80, March.
    16. Truc Thanh Tran & Nam Khanh Pham, 2024. "Risk Preferences and Entrepreneurial Decision-Making: Evidence from Experimental Methods in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Arilla-Llorente, Ramon & Gavurova, Beata & Rigelsky, Martin & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2024. "Quantifying the dynamics of relationships between eco-innovations and SDG 8," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Erland Hejn Nielsen & Steen Nielsen, 2020. "Preparing students for careers using business analytics and data-driven decision making," Economics Working Papers 2020-08, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    19. Taishykov, Zhandos & Tolysbayeva, Madina & Zhumanazarov, Kassymkhan & Ibraimova, Saule & Mizambekova, Zhamilya, 2024. "Management of innovation processes in agriculture," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    20. Dag Øivind Madsen & Kåre Slåtten, 2015. "The Balanced Scorecard: Fashion or Virus?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-35, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joiaen:v:11:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1186_s13731-022-00202-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.