IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joheur/v23y2017i1d10.1007_s10732-017-9323-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network design through forests with degree- and role-constrained minimum spanning trees

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Anton-Sanchez

    (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid)

  • Concha Bielza

    (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid)

  • Pedro Larrañaga

    (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid)

Abstract

Finding the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree (DCMST) of a graph is a widely studied NP-hard problem. One of its most important applications is network design. Here we deal with a new variant of the DCMST problem, which consists of finding not only the degree- but also the role-constrained minimum spanning tree (DRCMST), i.e., we add constraints to restrict the role of the nodes in the tree to root, intermediate or leaf node. Furthermore, we do not limit the number of root nodes to one, thereby, generally, building a forest of DRCMSTs. The modeling of network design problems can benefit from the possibility of generating more than one tree and determining the role of the nodes in the network. We propose a novel permutation-based representation to encode these forests. In this new representation, one permutation simultaneously encodes all the trees to be built. We simulate a wide variety of DRCMST problem instances which we optimize using different evolutionary computation algorithms encoding individuals of the population using the proposed representation. To illustrate the applicability of our approach, we formulate the trans-European transport network as a DRCMST problem. In this network design, we simultaneously optimize nine transport corridors and show that it is straightforward using the proposed representation to add constraints depending on the specific characteristics of the network.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Anton-Sanchez & Concha Bielza & Pedro Larrañaga, 2017. "Network design through forests with degree- and role-constrained minimum spanning trees," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 31-51, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:23:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10732-017-9323-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10732-017-9323-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10732-017-9323-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10732-017-9323-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz, Ruben & Maroto, Concepcion, 2005. "A comprehensive review and evaluation of permutation flowshop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 479-494, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehravaran, Yasaman & Logendran, Rasaratnam, 2012. "Non-permutation flowshop scheduling in a supply chain with sequence-dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 953-963.
    2. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2024. "A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 1-21.
    3. Chen, Shih-Hsin & Chen, Min-Chih, 2013. "Addressing the advantages of using ensemble probabilistic models in Estimation of Distribution Algorithms for scheduling problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 24-33.
    4. Smutnicki, Czeslaw & Pempera, Jaroslaw & Bocewicz, Grzegorz & Banaszak, Zbigniew, 2022. "Cyclic flow-shop scheduling with no-wait constraints and missing operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 39-49.
    5. Sioud, A. & Gagné, C., 2018. "Enhanced migrating birds optimization algorithm for the permutation flow shop problem with sequence dependent setup times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 66-73.
    6. Fatima Benbouzid-Si Tayeb & Karima Benatchba & Abd-Essalam Messiaid, 2018. "Game theory-based integration of scheduling with flexible and periodic maintenance planning in the permutation flowshop sequencing problem," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 221-255, April.
    7. Ruiz, Ruben & Stutzle, Thomas, 2007. "A simple and effective iterated greedy algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 2033-2049, March.
    8. Hatami, Sara & Ruiz, Rubén & Andrés-Romano, Carlos, 2015. "Heuristics and metaheuristics for the distributed assembly permutation flowshop scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 76-88.
    9. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.
    10. Zewen Sun & Xingsheng Gu, 2017. "Hybrid Algorithm Based on an Estimation of Distribution Algorithm and Cuckoo Search for the No Idle Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with the Total Tardiness Criterion Minimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Kalczynski, Pawel J. & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2009. "An empirical analysis of the optimality rate of flow shop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 93-101, October.
    12. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    13. Bo Liu & Ling Wang & Ying Liu & Shouyang Wang, 2011. "A unified framework for population-based metaheuristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 231-262, June.
    14. Wang, Sheng-yao & Wang, Ling & Liu, Min & Xu, Ye, 2013. "An effective estimation of distribution algorithm for solving the distributed permutation flow-shop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 387-396.
    15. Pei-Chann Chang & Shih-Hsin Chen & Chin-Yuan Fan & V. Mani, 2010. "Generating artificial chromosomes with probability control in genetic algorithm for machine scheduling problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 197-211, November.
    16. Miguel A. González & Juan José Palacios & Camino R. Vela & Alejandro Hernández-Arauzo, 2017. "Scatter search for minimizing weighted tardiness in a single machine scheduling with setups," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 81-110, June.
    17. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2012. "An estimation of distribution algorithm for lot-streaming flow shop problems with setup times," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 166-180, April.
    18. Federico Della Croce & Andrea Grosso & Fabio Salassa, 2014. "A matheuristic approach for the two-machine total completion time flow shop problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 213(1), pages 67-78, February.
    19. Mostafa Khatami & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi, 2017. "Coordinative production and maintenance scheduling problem with flexible maintenance time intervals," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 857-867, April.
    20. Pan, Quan-Ke & Wang, Ling, 2012. "Effective heuristics for the blocking flowshop scheduling problem with makespan minimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 218-229, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joheur:v:23:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10732-017-9323-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.