IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v180y2010i1p197-21110.1007-s10479-008-0489-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generating artificial chromosomes with probability control in genetic algorithm for machine scheduling problems

Author

Listed:
  • Pei-Chann Chang
  • Shih-Hsin Chen
  • Chin-Yuan Fan
  • V. Mani

Abstract

In this paper, a novel genetic algorithm is developed by generating artificial chromosomes with probability control to solve the machine scheduling problems. Generating artificial chromosomes for Genetic Algorithm (ACGA) is closely related to Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Probabilistic Models (EAPM). The artificial chromosomes are generated by a probability model that extracts the gene information from current population. ACGA is considered as a hybrid algorithm because both the conventional genetic operators and a probability model are integrated. The ACGA proposed in this paper, further employs the “evaporation concept” applied in Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) to solve the permutation flowshop problem. The “evaporation concept” is used to reduce the effect of past experience and to explore new alternative solutions. In this paper, we propose three different methods for the probability of evaporation. This probability of evaporation is applied as soon as a job is assigned to a position in the permutation flowshop problem. Experimental results show that our ACGA with the evaporation concept gives better performance than some algorithms in the literature. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Suggested Citation

  • Pei-Chann Chang & Shih-Hsin Chen & Chin-Yuan Fan & V. Mani, 2010. "Generating artificial chromosomes with probability control in genetic algorithm for machine scheduling problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 197-211, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:180:y:2010:i:1:p:197-211:10.1007/s10479-008-0489-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-008-0489-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-008-0489-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-008-0489-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz, Ruben & Maroto, Concepcion, 2005. "A comprehensive review and evaluation of permutation flowshop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 479-494, September.
    2. George Li, 1997. "Single machine earliness and tardiness scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 546-558, February.
    3. Jouglet, Antoine & Savourey, David & Carlier, Jacques & Baptiste, Philippe, 2008. "Dominance-based heuristics for one-machine total cost scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 879-899, February.
    4. Peng Si Ow & Thomas E. Morton, 1989. "The Single Machine Early/Tardy Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 177-191, February.
    5. Akturk, M. Selim & Ozdemir, Deniz, 2001. "A new dominance rule to minimize total weighted tardiness with unequal release dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 394-412, December.
    6. S. Lin & B. W. Kernighan, 1973. "An Effective Heuristic Algorithm for the Traveling-Salesman Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 498-516, April.
    7. J M Framinan & J N D Gupta & R Leisten, 2004. "A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(12), pages 1243-1255, December.
    8. Chung-Yee Lee & Lei Lei & Michael Pinedo, 1997. "Current trends in deterministic scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 70(0), pages 1-41, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Pei-Chann & Huang, Wei-Hsiu & Wu, Jheng-Long & Cheng, T.C.E., 2013. "A block mining and re-combination enhanced genetic algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 45-55.
    2. Chen, Shih-Hsin & Chen, Min-Chih, 2013. "Addressing the advantages of using ensemble probabilistic models in Estimation of Distribution Algorithms for scheduling problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 24-33.
    3. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Shih-Hsin & Chen, Min-Chih, 2013. "Addressing the advantages of using ensemble probabilistic models in Estimation of Distribution Algorithms for scheduling problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 24-33.
    2. Valente, Jorge M.S. & Alves, Rui A.F.S., 2007. "Heuristics for the early/tardy scheduling problem with release dates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 261-274, March.
    3. Perez-Gonzalez, Paz & Framinan, Jose M., 2024. "A review and classification on distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 1-21.
    4. Hatami, Sara & Ruiz, Rubén & Andrés-Romano, Carlos, 2015. "Heuristics and metaheuristics for the distributed assembly permutation flowshop scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 76-88.
    5. Vincent T’kindt & Karima Bouibede-Hocine & Carl Esswein, 2007. "Counting and enumeration complexity with application to multicriteria scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 215-234, September.
    6. Jorge M. S. Valente & Rui A. F. S. Alves, 2003. "An Exact Approach to Early/Tardy Scheduling with Release Dates," FEP Working Papers 129, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    7. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.
    8. Kalczynski, Pawel J. & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2009. "An empirical analysis of the optimality rate of flow shop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 93-101, October.
    9. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    10. Pan, Quan-Ke & Wang, Ling, 2012. "Effective heuristics for the blocking flowshop scheduling problem with makespan minimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 218-229, April.
    11. Vallada, Eva & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2015. "New hard benchmark for flowshop scheduling problems minimising makespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 666-677.
    12. Naderi, Bahman & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "A scatter search algorithm for the distributed permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(2), pages 323-334.
    13. K Sheibani, 2010. "A fuzzy greedy heuristic for permutation flow-shop scheduling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(5), pages 813-818, May.
    14. Yenisey, Mehmet Mutlu & Yagmahan, Betul, 2014. "Multi-objective permutation flow shop scheduling problem: Literature review, classification and current trends," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-135.
    15. Baker, Kenneth R., 2014. "Minimizing earliness and tardiness costs in stochastic scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 445-452.
    16. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Molina-Pariente, Jose M. & Framinan, Jose M., 2020. "Generalised accelerations for insertion-based heuristics in permutation flowshop scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 858-872.
    17. Gerardo Minella & Rubén Ruiz & Michele Ciavotta, 2008. "A Review and Evaluation of Multiobjective Algorithms for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 451-471, August.
    18. Pessoa, Luciana S. & Andrade, Carlos E., 2018. "Heuristics for a flowshop scheduling problem with stepwise job objective function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 950-962.
    19. Boysen, Nils & Bock, Stefan, 2011. "Scheduling just-in-time part supply for mixed-model assembly lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 15-25, May.
    20. Li, Wei & Nault, Barrie R. & Ye, Honghan, 2019. "Trade-off balancing in scheduling for flow shop production and perioperative processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 817-830.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:180:y:2010:i:1:p:197-211:10.1007/s10479-008-0489-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.