IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i3d10.1007_s13132-023-01677-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transforming Talent Development: a Reflective Analysis of the Innovative Government-School Cooperation Model Under the Paradigm of Knowledge Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Shu Zhang

    (Yangzhou Polytechnic Institute)

  • Ziwen Sun

    (City University of Macau)

  • Zhongyi Fan

    (Wenzhou University)

  • Shiyang Weng

    (Wenzhou University)

Abstract

In the fiercely competitive academic landscape, universities face the imperative to thrive through governmental support and cooperative models for talent development. This trilateral collaboration, involving government, enterprise, and educational institutions, synchronizes talent development with industry standards, resolves talent shortages, and fosters mutual benefits. Proactive collaboration with advanced enterprises is essential to stimulate students’ proactiveness and elevate employment rates. The deepening collaboration among government, businesses, and educational institutions enhances employment opportunities for graduates. This study advocates for talent cultivation within government-business-educational institution cooperative universities, aligning with societal development needs. It offers valuable insights into academia-industry dynamics in the knowledge economy. Our research introduces cognitive graphs as a dynamic tool for knowledge comprehension and memorization, contributing significantly to the scholarly discourse. The cognitive graph-based approach introduces a structured framework for talent cultivation, enhancing students’ learning experiences. Recommendations include raising stakeholder awareness and deeper integration of cognitive graphs into pedagogical strategies. This research enriches the existing literature and offers practical recommendations for universities and educational institutions. In the context of China’s economic restructuring, the imperative lies in the cultivation of talent through a tripartite partnership. Cognitive graphs serve as invaluable tools, guiding students along the correct learning trajectory. The talent cultivation model of government-enterprise-school cooperative universities, integrating cognitive graphs, yields students with heightened learning abilities while maintaining a cost-effective structure. Theoretical implications highlight the importance of innovative teaching methodologies and personalized learning. The successful application of cognitive graphs as a knowledge integration tool underscores their value in enhancing students’ ability to think systematically and creatively. The analysis of shortcomings in traditional cooperation models emphasizes the need for a comprehensive theoretical framework. Managerial implications stress the importance of adopting a cognitive graph-based approach in collaborative talent cultivation. Enterprises can benefit from actively participating in collaborative talent development. Enhancing cooperation awareness and commitment among stakeholders is crucial for creating a conducive environment for talent development.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu Zhang & Ziwen Sun & Zhongyi Fan & Shiyang Weng, 2024. "Transforming Talent Development: a Reflective Analysis of the Innovative Government-School Cooperation Model Under the Paradigm of Knowledge Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 15176-15201, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01677-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01677-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01677-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-023-01677-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kolade, Oluwaseun & Adegbile, Abiodun & Sarpong, David, 2022. "Can university-industry-government collaborations drive a 3D printing revolution in Africa? A triple helix model of technological leapfrogging in additive manufacturing," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Brown, Phillip & Hesketh, Anthony, 2004. "The Mismanagement of Talent: Employability and Jobs in the Knowledge Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199269549.
    3. Kerstin Fink & Christian Ploder, 2009. "Knowledge Management Toolkit for SMEs," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 5(1), pages 46-60, January.
    4. Fatima, Samar & Desouza, Kevin C. & Dawson, Gregory S., 2020. "National strategic artificial intelligence plans: A multi-dimensional analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 178-194.
    5. Erjia Yan & Ying Ding, 2009. "Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 60(10), pages 2107-2118, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberta Comunian & Alessandra Faggian & Sarah Jewell, 2014. "Embedding Arts and Humanities in the Creative Economy: The Role of Graduates in the UK," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(3), pages 426-450, June.
    2. Fatima, Samar & Desouza, Kevin C. & Denford, James S. & Dawson, Gregory S., 2021. "What explains governments interest in artificial intelligence? A signaling theory approach," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 238-254.
    3. Saima Javed & Yu Rong & Babar Nawaz Abbasi, 2024. "Convergence analysis of artificial intelligence research capacity: Are the less developed catching up with the developed ones?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 2172-2192, May.
    4. Sophie Hennekam & Dawn Bennett & Sally Macarthur & Cat Hope & Talisha Goh, 2018. "An international perspective on managing career as a woman composer," Post-Print hal-03232754, HAL.
    5. Zhai, Li & Yan, Xiangbin, 2022. "A directed collaboration network for exploring the order of scientific collaboration," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    6. Ming‐Lang Tseng & Hien Minh Ha & Thi Phuong Thuy Tran & Tat‐Dat Bui & Chih‐Cheng Chen & Chun‐Wei Lin, 2022. "Building a data‐driven circular supply chain hierarchical structure: Resource recovery implementation drives circular business strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2082-2106, July.
    7. Moyo Lincolyn & Mukomana Saziso, 2021. "The use of experiential learning in effective provision of skills to secondary school learners in Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(6), pages 155-159, June.
    8. Sandra Cristina Oliveira & Juliana Cobre & Danilo Florentino Pereira, 2021. "A measure of reliability for scientific co-authorship networks using fuzzy logic," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4551-4563, June.
    9. Alireza Abbasi & Mahdi Jalili & Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki, 2018. "Influence of network-based structural and power diversity on research performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(1), pages 579-590, October.
    10. Theocharis Kromydas, 2017. "Rethinking higher education and its relationship with social inequalities: past knowledge, present state and future potential," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Sameer Kumar & Jariah Mohd. Jan, 2013. "Mapping research collaborations in the business and management field in Malaysia, 1980–2010," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(3), pages 491-517, December.
    12. Kim Allen & Sumi Hollingworth, 2013. "‘Sticky Subjects’ or ‘Cosmopolitan Creatives’? Social Class, Place and Urban Young People’s Aspirations for Work in the Knowledge Economy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(3), pages 499-517, February.
    13. Yichi Zhang & Zhiliang Dong & Sen Liu & Peixiang Jiang & Cuizhi Zhang & Chao Ding, 2021. "Forecast of International Trade of Lithium Carbonate Products in Importing Countries and Small-Scale Exporting Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Johanna L Waters, 2009. "In Pursuit of Scarcity: Transnational Students, ‘Employability’, and the MBA," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(8), pages 1865-1883, August.
    15. Kwangsu Cho & Sehee Han & Ting-Ting Rachel Chung & Patrick J. Bateman, 2017. "The Influence of an Integrated View of Source’s Expertise on Knowledge Transfer," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Carlo D'Ippoliti, 2021. "“Many‐Citedness”: Citations Measure More Than Just Scientific Quality," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 1271-1301, December.
    17. Jungwon Yoon & Joshua SungWoo Yang & Han Woo Park, 2017. "Quintuple helix structure of Sino-Korean research collaboration in science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 61-81, October.
    18. Xiaojun Hu & Ronald Rousseau & Jin Chen, 2012. "Structural indicators in citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 451-460, May.
    19. Lei Hou & Jiashan Luo & Xue Pan, 2022. "Research Topic Specialization of Universities in Information Science and Library Science and Its Impact on Inter-University Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Chao Lu & Yingyi Zhang & Yong‐Yeol Ahn & Ying Ding & Chenwei Zhang & Dandan Ma, 2020. "Co‐contributorship network and division of labor in individual scientific collaborations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(10), pages 1162-1178, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01677-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.