IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v15y2024i1d10.1007_s13132-023-01315-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Driving Open Innovation Capability Through New Knowledge Diffusion of Integrating Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations in Organizations: Moderator of Individual Absorptive Capacity

Author

Listed:
  • Mai-Lun Chiu

    (National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism)

  • Tsung-Sheng Cheng

    (Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology)

  • Chun-Nan Lin

    (National Taitung University)

Abstract

Open innovation within an organization focuses on the dissemination of new knowledge among employees in different departmental units. When the willingness to share knowledge with colleagues increases, new knowledge dissemination can be achieved. Therefore, it is vital to understand which factors can influence knowledge flow in an organization. Human behavior is strongly influenced by internal and external motivations. The technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework can be considered an extrinsic motivation associated with the sharing behavior and the diffusion of new knowledge. Furthermore, individuals have innate psychological needs that support knowledge exchange, making them eager to interact with others. Based on the internal and external motivations and the TOE model, this study proposes an innovative and complete research model to explore the factors which affect open innovation capability within an organization. There were 217 responses to this research questionnaire from 600 organizations, and PLS was used to validate the model. Empirical findings indicate: (1) the importance of extrinsic motivation such as organizational culture and disruptive technology, having strong effects as intrinsic motivation like interactive desire is also concerned; (2) new knowledge diffusion has a significant effect on open innovation capability; (3) the moderating factor of individual absorptive capacity may strengthen the connection between new knowledge diffusion and open innovation capability. The results increase our understanding for what motivations actually drive new knowledge diffusion in transmitting open innovation capability in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mai-Lun Chiu & Tsung-Sheng Cheng & Chun-Nan Lin, 2024. "Driving Open Innovation Capability Through New Knowledge Diffusion of Integrating Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations in Organizations: Moderator of Individual Absorptive Capacity," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 3685-3717, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01315-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-023-01315-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01315-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-023-01315-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siddharth Gaurav Majhi & Saurav Snehvrat & Sanjay Chaudhary & Arindam Mukherjee, 2020. "The Synergistic Role Of Individual Absorptive Capacity And Individual Ambidexterity In Open Innovation: A Moderated-Mediation Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(07), pages 1-30, October.
    2. Pirkkalainen, Henri & Pawlowski, Jan M. & Bick, Markus & Tannhäuser, Anne-Christin, 2018. "Engaging in knowledge exchange: The instrumental psychological ownership in open innovation communities," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 277-287.
    3. Marco Tortoriello, 2015. "The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 586-597, April.
    4. Pereira, Vijay & Bamel, Umesh, 2021. "Extending the resource and knowledge based view: A critical analysis into its theoretical evolution and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 557-570.
    5. Aboelmaged, Mohamed Gamal, 2014. "Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 639-651.
    6. Ikujiro Nonaka & Ryoko Toyama, 2003. "The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 2-10, July.
    7. Emre Yildiz, H. & Murtic, Adis & Klofsten, Magnus & Zander, Udo & Richtnér, Anders, 2021. "Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Yavuz Ağan & Mehmet Fatih Acar & Eren Erdogan, 2018. "Knowledge management, supplier integration, and new product development," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 105-117, January.
    9. Schmidthuber, Lisa & Maresch, Daniela & Ginner, Michael, 2020. "Disruptive technologies and abundance in the service sector - toward a refined technology acceptance model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Stella Tomasi & David Schuff & Ozgur Turetken, 2018. "Understanding novelty: how task structure and tool familiarity moderate performance," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 406-418, April.
    11. Chengli Shu & Mengli Zhao & Jinxin Liu & Wendy Lindsay, 2020. "Why firms go green and how green impacts financial and innovation performance differently: An awareness-motivation-capability perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 795-821, September.
    12. One-Ki (Daniel) Lee & Mo (Winnie) Wang & Kai H. Lim & Zeyu (Jerry) Peng, 2009. "Knowledge Management Systems Diffusion in Chinese Enterprises: A Multistage Approach Using the Technology-Organization-Environment Framework," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 17(1), pages 70-84, January.
    13. Wu, Ing-Long & Chiu, Mai-Lun, 2018. "Examining supply chain collaboration with determinants and performance impact: Social capital, justice, and technology use perspectives," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 5-19.
    14. Zhen Shao & Yuqiang Feng & Tienan Wang, 2017. "Charismatic leadership and tacit knowledge sharing in the context of enterprise systems learning: the mediating effect of psychological safety climate and intrinsic motivation," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 194-208, February.
    15. SUN, Yu-tao & ZHANG, Chen & WANG, Jin-min, 2022. "How to Benefit from Balancing External Knowledge Acquisition? A Chinese EIT Industry Case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    16. Wenting Chen & Chunjia Han & Lei Wang & Petros Ieromonachou & Xiaochen Lu, 2021. "Recognition of entrepreneur’s social ties and firm innovation in emerging markets: explanation from the industrial institutional environment and survival pressure," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 491-518, June.
    17. Haaker, Timber & Ly, Pham Thi Minh & Nguyen-Thanh, Nhan & Nguyen, Hanh Thi Hong, 2021. "Business model innovation through the application of the Internet-of-Things: A comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 126-136.
    18. Juan Manuel Ramon-Jeronimo & Raquel Florez-Lopez & Maria Angeles Ramon-Jeronimo, 2017. "Understanding the Generation of Value along Supply Chains: Balancing Control Information and Relational Governance Mechanisms in Downstream and Upstream Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-31, August.
    19. Qiao, Tong & Shan, Wei & Zhang, Mingli & Liu, Chen, 2019. "How to facilitate knowledge diffusion in complex networks: The roles of network structure, knowledge role distribution and selection rule," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 152-167.
    20. Kim, Minkyun & Chai, Sangmi, 2017. "The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 42-52.
    21. Ullah, Fahim & Qayyum, Siddra & Thaheem, Muhammad Jamaluddin & Al-Turjman, Fadi & Sepasgozar, Samad M.E., 2021. "Risk management in sustainable smart cities governance: A TOE framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    22. Zhong, Lina & Verma, Rohit & Wei, Wenqi & Morrsion, Alastair M. & Yang, Liyu, 2022. "Multi-stakeholder perspectives on the impacts of service robots in urban hotel rooms," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    23. repec:igg:jkm000:v:17:y:2021:i:2:p:23-49 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Naqshbandi, M. Muzamil & Jasimuddin, Sajjad M., 2018. "Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 701-713.
    25. Schweisfurth, Tim G. & Raasch, Christina, 2018. "Absorptive Capacity for Need Knowledge: Antecedents and Effects for Employee Innovativeness," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 687-699.
    26. Zhou, Min & Govindan, Kannan & Xie, Xiongbiao & Yan, Liang, 2021. "How to drive green innovation in China's mining enterprises? Under the perspective of environmental legitimacy and green absorptive capacity," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zahid Sarwar & Jingmei Gao & Adnan Khan, 2024. "Nexus of digital platforms, innovation capability, and strategic alignment to enhance innovation performance in the Asia Pacific region: a dynamic capability perspective," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 867-901, June.
    2. Lei Xu & Ronggui Ding & Lei Wang, 2022. "How to facilitate knowledge diffusion in collaborative innovation projects by adjusting network density and project roles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1353-1379, March.
    3. Ayyildiz, Ahu Yazici & Baykal, Muhammed & Koc, Erdogan, 2022. "Attitudes of hotel customers towards the use of service robots in hospitality service encounters," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Qianru Liu & Jianmei Liu & Cheng Gong, 2023. "Digital transformation and corporate innovation: A factor input perspective," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2159-2174, June.
    5. Amna Manzoor & Bowen Zhang & Hongguang Ma, 2023. "Knowledge-Oriented Leadership in Powering Team Performance and Sustainable Competitive Advantages through Innovation: Evidence from Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Bouguerra, Abderaouf & Mellahi, Kamel & Glaister, Keith & Sadeghi, Arash & Temouri, Yama & Tatoglu, Ekrem, 2022. "Absorptive capacity and organizational performance in an emerging market context: Evidence from the banking industry in Turkey," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1575-1587.
    7. Anlan Chen & Yong Lin & Marcello Mariani & Yongyi Shou & Yufeng Zhang, 2023. "Entrepreneurial growth in digital business ecosystems: an integrated framework blending the knowledge-based view of the firm and business ecosystems," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1628-1653, October.
    8. Mahroof, Kamran, 2019. "A human-centric perspective exploring the readiness towards smart warehousing: The case of a large retail distribution warehouse," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 176-190.
    9. Sabrinah Adam & Nursyazwani Mohd Fuzi & Mohamad Rohieszan Ramdan & Rosmah Mat Isa & Albert Feisal Muhd Feisal Ismail & Mohd Yussni Hashim & Sharon Yong Yee Ong & Shah Iskandar Fahmie Ramlee, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Performance of Online Business in Malaysia: The Mediating Role of the Knowledge Management Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Romasanta, Angelo K.S. & van der Sijde, Peter & de Esch, Iwan J.P., 2022. "Absorbing knowledge from an emerging field: The role of interfacing by proponents in big pharma," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    11. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    12. Javed, Hasnain & Du, Jianguo & Iqbal, Shuja & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Basheer, Muhammad Farhan, 2024. "The impact of mineral resource abundance on environmental degradation in ten mineral- rich countries: Do the green innovation and financial technology matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    13. Yildiz, H. Emre & Murtic, Adis & Zander, Udo, 2024. "Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Sujan Piya & Ahm Shamsuzzoha & Mohammad Khadem & Nasr Al-Hinai, 2020. "Identification of Critical Factors and Their Interrelationships to Design Agile Supply Chain: Special Focus to Oil and Gas Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 263-281, September.
    17. Fracarolli Nunes, Mauro & Lee Park, Camila & Shin, Hyunju, 2021. "Corporate social and environmental irresponsibilities in supply chains, contamination, and damage of intangible resources: A behavioural approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    18. Wei Zhang & Xiuli Zhong & Xue Li, 2024. "The impact of degree of internationalization of MNEs on green innovation performance: The moderating role of absorptive capacity and global dynamic management capability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 659-675, January.
    19. Philipp Wetzel & Erik Hofmann, 2020. "Toward a Multi-Sided Model of Service Quality for Logistics Service Providers," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, October.
    20. Zhang-Zhang, YingYing & Rohlfer, Sylvia & Varma, Arup, 2022. "Strategic people management in contemporary highly dynamic VUCA contexts: A knowledge worker perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 587-598.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:15:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s13132-023-01315-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.