IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v63y2015i4p633-652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new preference handling technique for interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off

Author

Listed:
  • Kaisa Miettinen
  • Dmitry Podkopaev
  • Francisco Ruiz
  • Mariano Luque

Abstract

Because the purpose of multiobjective optimization methods is to optimize conflicting objectives simultaneously, they mainly focus on Pareto optimal solutions, where improvement with respect to some objective is only possible by allowing some other objective(s) to impair. Bringing this idea into practice requires the decision maker to think in terms of trading-off, which may limit the ability of effective problem solving. We outline some drawbacks of this and exploit another idea emphasizing the possibility of simultaneous improvement of all objectives. Based on this idea, we propose a technique for handling decision maker’s preferences, which eliminates the necessity to think in terms of trade-offs. We incorporate this technique into an interactive trade-off-free method for multiobjective optimization. We call the resulting method NAUTILUS 2, which is also suitable for negotiation support. We demonstrate the applicability of the new method with an example problem. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Kaisa Miettinen & Dmitry Podkopaev & Francisco Ruiz & Mariano Luque, 2015. "A new preference handling technique for interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 633-652, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:63:y:2015:i:4:p:633-652
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-015-0301-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10898-015-0301-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-015-0301-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Abel, Ami & Korhonen, Pekka, 1996. "Using aspiration levels in an interactive interior multiobjective linear programming algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 193-201, February.
    3. Kaliszewski, Ignacy, 2004. "Out of the mist--towards decision-maker-friendly multiple criteria decision making support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 293-307, October.
    4. Francisco Ruiz & Mariano Luque & Kaisa Miettinen, 2012. "Improving the computational efficiency in a global formulation (GLIDE) for interactive multiobjective optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 47-70, August.
    5. Aloysius, John A. & Davis, Fred D. & Wilson, Darryl D. & Ross Taylor, A. & Kottemann, Jeffrey E., 2006. "User acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: The impact of preference elicitation techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 273-285, February.
    6. Ehtamo, Harri & Kettunen, Eero & Hamalainen, Raimo P., 2001. "Searching for joint gains in multi-party negotiations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 54-69, April.
    7. Luque, Mariano & Miettinen, Kaisa & Eskelinen, Petri & Ruiz, Francisco, 2009. "Incorporating preference information in interactive reference point methods for multiobjective optimization," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 450-462, April.
    8. Miettinen, Kaisa & Eskelinen, Petri & Ruiz, Francisco & Luque, Mariano, 2010. "NAUTILUS method: An interactive technique in multiobjective optimization based on the nadir point," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 426-434, October.
    9. J. Cabello & M. Luque & F. Miguel & A. Ruiz & F. Ruiz, 2014. "A multiobjective interactive approach to determine the optimal electricity mix in Andalucía (Spain)," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 109-127, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaisa Miettinen & Francisco Ruiz, 2016. "NAUTILUS framework: towards trade-off-free interaction in multiobjective optimization," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 5-21, January.
    2. Piercy, Craig A. & Steuer, Ralph E., 2019. "Reducing wall-clock time for the computation of all efficient extreme points in multiple objective linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 653-666.
    3. Ana B. Ruiz & Francisco Ruiz & Kaisa Miettinen & Laura Delgado-Antequera & Vesa Ojalehto, 2019. "NAUTILUS Navigator: free search interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 213-231, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaisa Miettinen & Francisco Ruiz, 2016. "NAUTILUS framework: towards trade-off-free interaction in multiobjective optimization," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 5-21, January.
    2. Ana B. Ruiz & Francisco Ruiz & Kaisa Miettinen & Laura Delgado-Antequera & Vesa Ojalehto, 2019. "NAUTILUS Navigator: free search interactive multiobjective optimization without trading-off," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 213-231, June.
    3. Ruiz, Ana B. & Sindhya, Karthik & Miettinen, Kaisa & Ruiz, Francisco & Luque, Mariano, 2015. "E-NAUTILUS: A decision support system for complex multiobjective optimization problems based on the NAUTILUS method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 218-231.
    4. Miettinen, Kaisa & Eskelinen, Petri & Ruiz, Francisco & Luque, Mariano, 2010. "NAUTILUS method: An interactive technique in multiobjective optimization based on the nadir point," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 426-434, October.
    5. Vesa Ojalehto & Kaisa Miettinen & Timo Laukkanen, 2014. "Implementation aspects of interactive multiobjective optimization for modeling environments: the case of GAMS-NIMBUS," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 757-779, July.
    6. Piotr Wojewnik & Tomasz Szapiro, 2010. "Bireference Procedure fBIP for Interactive Multicriteria Optimization with Fuzzy Coefficients," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 2(3), pages 169-193, June.
    7. Bhupinder Singh Saini & Michael Emmerich & Atanu Mazumdar & Bekir Afsar & Babooshka Shavazipour & Kaisa Miettinen, 2022. "Optimistic NAUTILUS navigator for multiobjective optimization with costly function evaluations," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 865-889, August.
    8. Rafael Rodríguez & Mariano Luque & Mercedes González, 2011. "Portfolio selection in the Spanish stock market by interactive multiobjective programming," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(1), pages 213-231, July.
    9. Jiménez, Mariano & Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar, 2021. "Incorporating preferential weights as a benchmark into a Sequential Reference Point Method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 575-585.
    10. Korhonen, Pekka J. & Wallenius, Jyrki & Genc, Tolga & Xu, Peng, 2021. "On rational behavior in multi-attribute riskless choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 331-342.
    11. J. Cabello & M. Luque & F. Miguel & A. Ruiz & F. Ruiz, 2014. "A multiobjective interactive approach to determine the optimal electricity mix in Andalucía (Spain)," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 109-127, April.
    12. Ziho Kang & Thomas Morin, 2016. "Multi-Attribute Decision Making in a Bidding Game with Imperfect Information and Uncertainty," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 63-81, January.
    13. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.
    14. Herrmann, Tabea & Hübler, Olaf & Menkhoff, Lukas & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2016. "Allais for the poor," Kiel Working Papers 2036, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    15. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.
    16. Berg, Joyce E. & Rietz, Thomas A., 2019. "Longshots, overconfidence and efficiency on the Iowa Electronic Market," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 271-287.
    17. Reckers, Philip M.J. & Sanders, Debra L. & Roark, Stephen J., 1994. "The Influence of Ethical Attitudes on Taxpayer Compliance," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 47(4), pages 825-836, December.
    18. Bier, Vicki & Gutfraind, Alexander, 2019. "Risk analysis beyond vulnerability and resilience – characterizing the defensibility of critical systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 626-636.
    19. Sitinjak Elizabeth Lucky Maretha & Haryanti Kristiana & Kurniasari Widuri & Sasmito Yohanes Wisnu Djati, 2019. "Investor behavior based on personality and company life cycle," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 23-38, August.
    20. Theo Arentze & Tao Feng & Harry Timmermans & Jops Robroeks, 2012. "Context-dependent influence of road attributes and pricing policies on route choice behavior of truck drivers: results of a conjoint choice experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1173-1188, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:63:y:2015:i:4:p:633-652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.