IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v60y2014i1p25-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local reduction based SQP-type method for semi-infinite programs with an infinite number of second-order cone constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Takayuki Okuno
  • Masao Fukushima

Abstract

The second-order cone program (SOCP) is an optimization problem with second-order cone (SOC) constraints and has achieved notable developments in the last decade. The classical semi-infinite program (SIP) is represented with infinitely many inequality constraints, and has been studied extensively so far. In this paper, we consider the SIP with infinitely many SOC constraints, called the SISOCP for short. Compared with the standard SIP and SOCP, the studies on the SISOCP are scarce, even though it has important applications such as Chebychev approximation for vector-valued functions. For solving the SISOCP, we develop an algorithm that combines a local reduction method with an SQP-type method. In this method, we reduce the SISOCP to an SOCP with finitely many SOC constraints by means of implicit functions and apply an SQP-type method to the latter problem. We study the global and local convergence properties of the proposed algorithm. Finally, we observe the effectiveness of the algorithm through some numerical experiments. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Takayuki Okuno & Masao Fukushima, 2014. "Local reduction based SQP-type method for semi-infinite programs with an infinite number of second-order cone constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 25-48, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:60:y:2014:i:1:p:25-48
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-013-0063-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10898-013-0063-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-013-0063-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lopez, Marco & Still, Georg, 2007. "Semi-infinite programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 491-518, July.
    2. Dong-Hui Li & Liqun Qi & Judy Tam & Soon-Yi Wu, 2004. "A Smoothing Newton Method for Semi-Infinite Programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 169-194, November.
    3. Yun Wang & Liwei Zhang, 2009. "Properties of equation reformulation of the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition for nonlinear second order cone optimization problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 70(2), pages 195-218, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li-Ping Pang & Qi Wu & Jin-He Wang & Qiong Wu, 2020. "A discretization algorithm for nonsmooth convex semi-infinite programming problems based on bundle methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 125-153, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. Mishra & M. Jaiswal & H. Le Thi, 2012. "Nonsmooth semi-infinite programming problem using Limiting subdifferentials," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 285-296, June.
    2. Bo Wei & William B. Haskell & Sixiang Zhao, 2020. "An inexact primal-dual algorithm for semi-infinite programming," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 91(3), pages 501-544, June.
    3. Mengwei Xu & Soon-Yi Wu & Jane Ye, 2014. "Solving semi-infinite programs by smoothing projected gradient method," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 591-616, December.
    4. Li-Ping Pang & Jian Lv & Jin-He Wang, 2016. "Constrained incremental bundle method with partial inexact oracle for nonsmooth convex semi-infinite programming problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 433-465, June.
    5. Ping Jin & Chen Ling & Huifei Shen, 2015. "A smoothing Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm for semi-infinite programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 675-695, April.
    6. Bo Wei & William B. Haskell & Sixiang Zhao, 2020. "The CoMirror algorithm with random constraint sampling for convex semi-infinite programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(2), pages 809-841, December.
    7. Stein, Oliver, 2012. "How to solve a semi-infinite optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 312-320.
    8. Liwei Zhang & Shengzhe Gao & Saoyan Guo, 2019. "Statistical Inference of Second-Order Cone Programming," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(02), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Souvik Das & Ashwin Aravind & Ashish Cherukuri & Debasish Chatterjee, 2022. "Near-optimal solutions of convex semi-infinite programs via targeted sampling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 129-146, November.
    10. Aguiar, Victor H. & Kashaev, Nail & Allen, Roy, 2023. "Prices, profits, proxies, and production," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 666-693.
    11. Li Wang & Feng Guo, 2014. "Semidefinite relaxations for semi-infinite polynomial programming," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 133-159, May.
    12. Xiaojiao Tong & Soon-Yi Wu & Renjun Zhou, 2010. "New approach for the nonlinear programming with transient stability constraints arising from power systems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 495-520, April.
    13. Shaojian Qu & Mark Goh & Soon-Yi Wu & Robert Souza, 2014. "Multiobjective DC programs with infinite convex constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 41-58, May.
    14. Cao Thanh Tinh & Thai Doan Chuong, 2022. "Conic Linear Programming Duals for Classes of Quadratic Semi-Infinite Programs with Applications," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(2), pages 570-596, August.
    15. Yong-Jin Liu & Li Wang, 2016. "Properties associated with the epigraph of the $$l_1$$ l 1 norm function of projection onto the nonnegative orthant," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 84(1), pages 205-221, August.
    16. Josef Kallrath & Steffen Rebennack, 2014. "Cutting ellipses from area-minimizing rectangles," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 405-437, July.
    17. Duarte, Belmiro P.M. & Sagnol, Guillaume & Wong, Weng Kee, 2018. "An algorithm based on semidefinite programming for finding minimax optimal designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 99-117.
    18. Ashkan Mohammadi & Boris S. Mordukhovich & M. Ebrahim Sarabi, 2020. "Superlinear Convergence of the Sequential Quadratic Method in Constrained Optimization," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 731-758, September.
    19. Nazih Abderrazzak Gadhi, 2019. "Necessary optimality conditions for a nonsmooth semi-infinite programming problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 161-168, May.
    20. He, Li & Huang, Guo H. & Lu, Hongwei, 2011. "Bivariate interval semi-infinite programming with an application to environmental decision-making analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 452-465, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:60:y:2014:i:1:p:25-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.