IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jglopt/v59y2014i2p209-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Globally convergent DC trust-region methods

Author

Listed:
  • Hoai Le Thi
  • Van Huynh
  • Tao Dinh
  • A. Vaz
  • L. Vicente

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the use of DC (Difference of Convex functions) models and algorithms in the application of trust-region methods to the solution of a class of nonlinear optimization problems where the constrained set is closed and convex (and, from a practical point of view, where projecting onto the feasible region is computationally affordable). We consider DC local models for the quadratic model of the objective function used to compute the trust-region step, and apply a primal-dual subgradient method to the solution of the corresponding trust-region subproblems. One is able to prove that the resulting scheme is globally convergent to first-order stationary points. The theory requires the use of exact second-order derivatives but, in turn, the computation of the trust-region step asks only for one projection onto the feasible region (in comparison to the calculation of the generalized Cauchy point which may require more). The numerical efficiency and robustness of the proposed new scheme when applied to bound-constrained problems is measured by comparing its performance against some of the current state-of-the-art nonlinear programming solvers on a vast collection of test problems. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Hoai Le Thi & Van Huynh & Tao Dinh & A. Vaz & L. Vicente, 2014. "Globally convergent DC trust-region methods," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 209-225, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:59:y:2014:i:2:p:209-225
    DOI: 10.1007/s10898-014-0170-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10898-014-0170-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10898-014-0170-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Le An & Pham Tao, 2005. "The DC (Difference of Convex Functions) Programming and DCA Revisited with DC Models of Real World Nonconvex Optimization Problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 23-46, January.
    2. A. Schwartz & E. Polak, 1997. "Family of Projected Descent Methods for Optimization Problems with Simple Bounds," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 1-31, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Min Tao & Jiang-Ning Li, 2023. "Error Bound and Isocost Imply Linear Convergence of DCA-Based Algorithms to D-Stationarity," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 205-232, April.
    2. Hoai An Le Thi & Van Ngai Huynh & Tao Pham Dinh, 2018. "Convergence Analysis of Difference-of-Convex Algorithm with Subanalytic Data," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 103-126, October.
    3. João Carlos O. Souza & Paulo Roberto Oliveira & Antoine Soubeyran, 2016. "Global convergence of a proximal linearized algorithm for difference of convex functions," Post-Print hal-01440298, HAL.
    4. Yuan, Quan & Liu, Binghui, 2021. "Community detection via an efficient nonconvex optimization approach based on modularity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. J. X. Cruz Neto & P. R. Oliveira & A. Soubeyran & J. C. O. Souza, 2020. "A generalized proximal linearized algorithm for DC functions with application to the optimal size of the firm problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 313-339, June.
    6. Crystal T. Nguyen & Daniel J. Luckett & Anna R. Kahkoska & Grace E. Shearrer & Donna Spruijt‐Metz & Jaimie N. Davis & Michael R. Kosorok, 2020. "Estimating individualized treatment regimes from crossover designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 778-788, September.
    7. M. Bierlaire & M. Thémans & N. Zufferey, 2010. "A Heuristic for Nonlinear Global Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 59-70, February.
    8. Ming Huang & Li-Ping Pang & Zun-Quan Xia, 2014. "The space decomposition theory for a class of eigenvalue optimizations," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 423-454, June.
    9. Bai, Jushan & Liao, Yuan, 2016. "Efficient estimation of approximate factor models via penalized maximum likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 1-18.
    10. Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico, 2020. "Essentials of numerical nonsmooth optimization," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-47, March.
    11. William Haskell & J. Shanthikumar & Z. Shen, 2013. "Optimization with a class of multivariate integral stochastic order constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 147-162, July.
    12. H. Le Thi & A. Vaz & L. Vicente, 2012. "Optimizing radial basis functions by d.c. programming and its use in direct search for global derivative-free optimization," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(1), pages 190-214, April.
    13. Jean-Paul Penot, 2011. "The directional subdifferential of the difference of two convex functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 505-519, March.
    14. Annabella Astorino & Antonio Fuduli & Manlio Gaudioso, 2012. "Margin maximization in spherical separation," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 301-322, October.
    15. Jeon, Jong-June & Kwon, Sunghoon & Choi, Hosik, 2017. "Homogeneity detection for the high-dimensional generalized linear model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 61-74.
    16. Kaisa Joki & Adil M. Bagirov & Napsu Karmitsa & Marko M. Mäkelä, 2017. "A proximal bundle method for nonsmooth DC optimization utilizing nonconvex cutting planes," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 501-535, July.
    17. Tao Pham Dinh & Nam Nguyen Canh & Hoai Le Thi, 2010. "An efficient combined DCA and B&B using DC/SDP relaxation for globally solving binary quadratic programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 595-632, December.
    18. Hoai Le Thi & Tao Pham Dinh & Moulay Belghiti, 2014. "DCA based algorithms for multiple sequence alignment (MSA)," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 22(3), pages 501-524, September.
    19. M. V. Dolgopolik, 2023. "DC semidefinite programming and cone constrained DC optimization II: local search methods," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 993-1031, July.
    20. Stefan Sremac & Fei Wang & Henry Wolkowicz & Lucas Pettersson, 2019. "Noisy Euclidean distance matrix completion with a single missing node," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 973-1002, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jglopt:v:59:y:2014:i:2:p:209-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.