IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v8y2025i1d10.1007_s42001-024-00331-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term care comparative studies by agent-based simulation: a computational framework and a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Shuang Chang

    (Fujitsu Research)

  • Koji Maruhashi

    (Fujitsu Research)

Abstract

Long-term care (LTC) services provide various types of assistance to elderly persons who may have difficulty conducting daily activities due to deterioration in health. There has been a growing interest in comparing different LTC designs to generate knowledge on how to deal with the diverse needs of such services. However, the system complexity arising from micro-level interactions among involved stakeholders complicates the comparison and creates the urgent need for deploying new approaches. This work aims to formalize and construct a computational framework that enables the deployment of bottom-up simulation approaches to compare and evaluate LTC models. It can be used to investigate the extent to which various LTC designs may influence LTC system outcomes, particularly in terms of equity and efficiency. To illustrate the application of this framework, we present a comparison of the effects of four different LTC designs considering the heterogeneity of individuals and their interactions with care providers using an agent-based simulation approach. This framework is among the first to support such comparative LTC studies by bottom-up simulation approaches. It is expected to be extended and customized by LTC domain experts for comparing the policy alternatives of their interests and thus to shed light on designing better LTC systems for benefiting the elderly.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuang Chang & Koji Maruhashi, 2025. "Long-term care comparative studies by agent-based simulation: a computational framework and a case study," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00331-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-024-00331-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-024-00331-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-024-00331-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jun’ichi Kotoku & Asuka Oyama & Kanako Kitazumi & Hiroshi Toki & Akihiro Haga & Ryohei Yamamoto & Maki Shinzawa & Miyae Yamakawa & Sakiko Fukui & Keiichi Yamamoto & Toshiki Moriyama, 2020. "Causal relations of health indices inferred statistically using the DirectLiNGAM algorithm from big data of Osaka prefecture health checkups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Elmar Kiesling & Markus Günther & Christian Stummer & Lea Wakolbinger, 2012. "Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(2), pages 183-230, June.
    3. Kutzin, Joseph, 2001. "A descriptive framework for country-level analysis of health care financing arrangements," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 171-204, June.
    4. Karlsson, Martin & Mayhew, Les & Rickayzen, Ben, 2007. "Long term care financing in 4 OECD countries: fiscal burden and distributive effects," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 34405, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Chang, Shuang & Yang, Wei & Deguchi, Hiroshi, 2020. "Care providers, access to care, and the Long-term Care Nursing Insurance in China: An agent-based simulation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    6. Lee, Ju-Sung & Filatova, Tatiana & Ligmann-Zielinska, Arika & Hassani-Mahmooei, Behrooz & Stonedahl, Forrest & Lorscheid, Iris & Voinov, Alexey & Polhill, J. Gareth & Sun, Zhanli & Parker, Dawn C., 2015. "The complexities of agent-based modeling output analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 18(4).
    7. Marcel Kvassay & Peter Krammer & Ladislav Hluchý & Bernhard Schneider, 2017. "Causal Analysis of an Agent-Based Model of Human Behaviour," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Niamir, Leila & Filatova, Tatiana & Voinov, Alexey & Bressers, Hans, 2018. "Transition to low-carbon economy: Assessing cumulative impacts of individual behavioral changes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 325-345.
    2. Régis Chenavaz & Corina Paraschiv & Gabriel Turinici, 2017. "Dynamic Pricing of New Products in Competitive Markets: A Mean-Field Game Approach," Working Papers hal-01592958, HAL.
    3. Balint, T. & Lamperti, F. & Mandel, A. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2017. "Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 252-265.
    4. Pablo Gottret & George Schieber, 2006. "Health Financing Revisited : A Practitioner's Guide," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7094.
    5. Constanza Fosco, 2012. "Spatial Difusion and Commuting Flows," Documentos de Trabajo en Economia y Ciencia Regional 30, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2012.
    6. Lea Sonderegger-Wakolbinger & Christian Stummer, 2015. "An agent-based simulation of customer multi-channel choice behavior," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(2), pages 459-477, June.
    7. Claudia Dislich & Elisabeth Hettig & Jan Salecker & Johannes Heinonen & Jann Lay & Katrin M Meyer & Kerstin Wiegand & Suria Tarigan, 2018. "Land-use change in oil palm dominated tropical landscapes—An agent-based model to explore ecological and socio-economic trade-offs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Corrado Monti & Marco Pangallo & Gianmarco De Francisci Morales & Francesco Bonchi, 2022. "On learning agent-based models from data," Papers 2205.05052, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    9. Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea & Sani, Amir, 2018. "Agent-based model calibration using machine learning surrogates," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 366-389.
    10. Giorgio Fagiolo & Mattia Guerini & Francesco Lamperti & Alessio Moneta & Andrea Roventini, 2017. "Validation of Agent-Based Models in Economics and Finance," LEM Papers Series 2017/23, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    11. Zila, Eric & Kukacka, Jiri, 2023. "Moment set selection for the SMM using simple machine learning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 366-391.
    12. Xiong, Hang & Payne, Diane & Kinsella, Stephen, 2016. "Peer effects in the diffusion of innovations: Theory and simulation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-13.
    13. Paolo Pellizzari & Elena Sartori & Marco Tolotti, 2015. "Trade-In Programs in the Context of Technological Innovation with Herding," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Frédéric Amblard & Francisco J. Miguel & Adrien Blanchet & Benoit Gaudou (ed.), Advances in Artificial Economics, edition 127, pages 219-230, Springer.
    14. Les Mayhew, 2017. "Means Testing Adult Social Care in England," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 42(3), pages 500-529, July.
    15. Hossein Sabzian & Mohammad Ali Shafia & Ali Maleki & Seyeed Mostapha Seyeed Hashemi & Ali Baghaei & Hossein Gharib, 2019. "Theories and Practice of Agent based Modeling: Some practical Implications for Economic Planners," Papers 1901.08932, arXiv.org.
    16. Kremastioti Vasiliki & Anastasiou Athanasios & Liargovas Panagiotis & Komninos Dimitrios & Dermatis Zacharias, 2018. "Economic Evaluation of Health Programs – Health Expenditures in the European Union," Valahian Journal of Economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 109-118, April.
    17. Kailun Feng & Weizhuo Lu & Thomas Olofsson & Shiwei Chen & Hui Yan & Yaowu Wang, 2018. "A Predictive Environmental Assessment Method for Construction Operations: Application to a Northeast China Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    18. Lei Xu & Ronggui Ding & Lei Wang, 2022. "How to facilitate knowledge diffusion in collaborative innovation projects by adjusting network density and project roles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1353-1379, March.
    19. Abedi, Vahideh Sadat, 2019. "Compartmental diffusion modeling: Describing customer heterogeneity & communication network to support decisions for new product introductions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 536(C).
    20. Lixin Zhou & Jie Lin & Yanfeng Li & Zhenyu Zhang, 2020. "Innovation Diffusion of Mobile Applications in Social Networks: A Multi-Agent System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:8:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s42001-024-00331-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.