IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcsosc/v2y2019i2d10.1007_s42001-019-00044-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personal stories matter: topic evolution and popularity among pro- and anti-vaccine online articles

Author

Listed:
  • Zhan Xu

    (Northern Arizona University)

Abstract

People tend to read health articles that have gone viral online. A large portion of online popular vaccine articles are against vaccines, which lead to increased exemption rates and recent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Since anti-vaccine articles’ themes and persuasive strategies change fast, their effects on viewers’ behaviors may change over time. This study examined how pro- and anti-vaccine topics and public interests have changed from 2007 to 2017. Computational methods (e.g., topic modeling) were used to analyze 923 online vaccine articles and over 4 million shares, reactions, and comments that they have received on social media. Pro-vaccine messages (PVMs) that used personal stories received the most heated discussion online and pure scientific knowledge received the least attention. PVMs that present vaccine disagreements and limitations were not popular. These findings indicate the importance of narratives and directly attacking opposing arguments in health message design. Anti-vaccine messages (AVMs) that discussed flu shots and government conspiracy received the most attention. Since April 2015, even though more PVMs appeared online, AVMs, especially those about vaccine damage, were increasingly more popular than PVMs. Some social events and disease outbreaks might contribute to the popularity of AVMs. Newly emerged anti-vaccine topics (e.g., false rumors of CDC conspiracy) should be noted. This study shows that certain topics can be more popular online and can potentially reach a larger population. It also reveals the evolution of vaccine-related topics and public’s interest. Findings can help to design effective interventions and develop programs to track and combat misinformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhan Xu, 2019. "Personal stories matter: topic evolution and popularity among pro- and anti-vaccine online articles," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 207-220, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:2:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-019-00044-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s42001-019-00044-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42001-019-00044-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s42001-019-00044-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cornelia Betsch & Corina Ulshöfer & Frank Renkewitz & Tilmann Betsch, 2011. "The Influence of Narrative v. Statistical Information on Perceiving Vaccination Risks," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(5), pages 742-753, September.
    2. Ali Faraji-Rad & Michel Tuan Pham, 2017. "Uncertainty Increases the Reliance on Affect in Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(1), pages 1-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Argyris, Young Anna & Kim, Yongsuk & Roscizewski, Alexa & Song, Won, 2021. "The mediating role of vaccine hesitancy between maternal engagement with anti- and pro-vaccine social media posts and adolescent HPV-vaccine uptake rates in the US: The perspective of loss aversion in," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Freling, Traci H. & Yang, Zhiyong & Saini, Ritesh & Itani, Omar S. & Rashad Abualsamh, Ryan, 2020. "When poignant stories outweigh cold hard facts: A meta-analysis of the anecdotal bias," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 51-67.
    2. Eger, Jens & Kaplan, Lennart & Sternberg, Henrike, 2022. "How to reduce vaccination hesitancy? The relevance of evidence and its communicator," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 433, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    3. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu & Nüfer Yasin Ateş, 2022. "Arguing to Defeat: Eristic Argumentation and Irrationality in Resolving Moral Concerns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 519-535, January.
    4. Aydinli, Aylin & Gu, Yangjie & Pham, Michel Tuan, 2017. "An experience-utility explanation of the preference for larger assortments," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 746-760.
    5. Eelen, Jiska & Özturan, Peren & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2017. "The differential impact of brand loyalty on traditional and online word of mouth: The moderating roles of self-brand connection and the desire to help the brand," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 872-891.
    6. Kim, Aekyoung & Briley, Donnel, 2020. "Finding the self in chance events," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 853-867.
    7. Martina Raue & Lisa A. D'Ambrosio & Carley Ward & Chaiwoo Lee & Claire Jacquillat & Joseph F. Coughlin, 2019. "The Influence of Feelings While Driving Regular Cars on the Perception and Acceptance of Self‐Driving Cars," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 358-374, February.
    8. repec:wrk:wrkemf:22 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Cornelia Betsch & Niels Haase & Frank Renkewitz & Philipp Schmid, 2015. "The narrative bias revisited: What drives the biasing influence of narrative information on risk perceptions?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(3), pages 241-264, May.
    10. Zheng, Dan & Chen, Yuxin & Zhang, Zhe & Che, Hai, 2022. "Retail price discount depth and perceived quality uncertainty," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 542-557.
    11. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:241-264 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Halbauer, Ingo & Klarmann, Martin, 2022. "How voice retailers can predict customer mood and how they can use that information," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 77-95.
    13. Natalie Nitsche & D. Susie Lee, 2022. "Emotion and fertility in times of disaster: conceptualizing fertility responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2022-020, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    14. Yilmaz, Tuba & Sagfossen, Sofie & Velasco, Carlos, 2023. "What makes NFTs valuable to consumers? Perceived value drivers associated with NFTs liking, purchasing, and holding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    15. Xia, Lan & Roggeveen, Anne L., 2022. "How collective stress affects price fairness perceptions: The role of nostalgia," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 361-371.
    16. Robert Oxoby & William G. Morrison, "undated". "Asset Integration, Risk Taking and Loss Aversion in the Laboratory," Working Papers 2019-04, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, revised 30 Jan 2019.
    17. Hutchings, Siobhan, 2024. "Individuals perceptions of electric vehicles and related policy : Findings from an online experiment," Warwick-Monash Economics Student Papers 74, Warwick Monash Economics Student Papers.
    18. Mariela E Jaffé & Leonie Reutner & Rainer Greifeneder, 2019. "Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Claudio Deiana & Andrea Geraci & Gianluca Mazzarella & Fabio Sabatini, 2022. "Perceived risk and vaccine hesitancy: Quasi‐experimental evidence from Italy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 1266-1275, June.
    20. Luyang Zhou & Shengxiao Li & Lianxi Zhou & Hong Tao & Dave Bouckenooghe, 2023. "The effects of perceived organizational support on employees’ sense of job insecurity in times of external threats: an empirical investigation under lockdown conditions in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1567-1591, September.
    21. Pieter Vanhuysse & Michael Jankowski & Markus Tepe, 2021. "Vaccine alliance building blocks: a conjoint experiment on popular support for international COVID-19 cooperation formats," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(3), pages 493-506, September.
    22. Kyra L Wiggin & Martin Reimann & Shailendra P Jain & Darren W Dahl & Margaret C Campbell & Paul M Herr, 2019. "Curiosity Tempts Indulgence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(6), pages 1194-1212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcsosc:v:2:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s42001-019-00044-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.