IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v44y2022i5d10.1007_s10878-022-00862-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A DC programming approach for solving a centralized group key management problem

Author

Listed:
  • Hoai An Le Thi

    (Université de Lorraine
    Institut Universitaire de France (IUF))

  • Thi Tuyet Trinh Nguyen

    (Université de Lorraine)

  • Hoang Phuc Hau Luu

    (Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

A single trusted entity known as a Key Server is in charge of key generation, distribution, and management in centralized key management schemes. To prevent eavesdropping and protect the exchange content, a group key is used to encrypt the group communication. This management mechanism is typically based on a binary tree structure. When the membership of a group changes dynamically, the group key must be changed, triggering a certain updated cost. This paper addresses an important problem in centralized dynamic group key management. It consists in finding a set of leaf nodes in a binary key tree to insert new members with minimal insertion cost and keeping the tree as balanced as possible. The two mentioned important objectives are combined into a unified (deterministic) optimization model whose objective function contains discontinuous step functions with binary variables, which is known to be NP-hard. We then reformulate the problem as a combinatorial optimization program with continuous objective by introducing new binary variables. Applying penalty techniques, it results in a standard DC (Difference of Convex functions) program that can be solved efficiently by DCA (DC algorithm). Besides, the insertion nodes must be the leaf nodes, we introduce a two-step algorithm to reduce the model complexity: the first is to find the set of leaf nodes, while the second is to solve the simplified optimization problem. Numerical experiments have been studied intensively to justify the merit of our proposed model as well as the corresponding DCA.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoai An Le Thi & Thi Tuyet Trinh Nguyen & Hoang Phuc Hau Luu, 2022. "A DC programming approach for solving a centralized group key management problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 3165-3193, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00862-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-022-00862-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-022-00862-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-022-00862-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tao Pham Dinh & Nam Nguyen Canh & Hoai Le Thi, 2010. "An efficient combined DCA and B&B using DC/SDP relaxation for globally solving binary quadratic programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 595-632, December.
    2. Le An & Pham Tao, 2005. "The DC (Difference of Convex Functions) Programming and DCA Revisited with DC Models of Real World Nonconvex Optimization Problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 23-46, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Pham Dinh & Yi-Shuai Niu, 2011. "An efficient DC programming approach for portfolio decision with higher moments," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 525-554, December.
    2. Le Thi, H.A. & Pham Dinh, T. & Le, H.M. & Vo, X.T., 2015. "DC approximation approaches for sparse optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 26-46.
    3. Hoai Le Thi & Tao Pham Dinh & Huynh Ngai, 2012. "Exact penalty and error bounds in DC programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 509-535, March.
    4. Min Tao & Jiang-Ning Li, 2023. "Error Bound and Isocost Imply Linear Convergence of DCA-Based Algorithms to D-Stationarity," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 205-232, April.
    5. Hoai An Le Thi & Van Ngai Huynh & Tao Pham Dinh, 2018. "Convergence Analysis of Difference-of-Convex Algorithm with Subanalytic Data," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 103-126, October.
    6. João Carlos O. Souza & Paulo Roberto Oliveira & Antoine Soubeyran, 2016. "Global convergence of a proximal linearized algorithm for difference of convex functions," Post-Print hal-01440298, HAL.
    7. Yuan, Quan & Liu, Binghui, 2021. "Community detection via an efficient nonconvex optimization approach based on modularity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Laura Girometti & Martin Huska & Alessandro Lanza & Serena Morigi, 2024. "Convex Predictor–Nonconvex Corrector Optimization Strategy with Application to Signal Decomposition," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 1286-1325, September.
    9. J. X. Cruz Neto & P. R. Oliveira & A. Soubeyran & J. C. O. Souza, 2020. "A generalized proximal linearized algorithm for DC functions with application to the optimal size of the firm problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 313-339, June.
    10. Crystal T. Nguyen & Daniel J. Luckett & Anna R. Kahkoska & Grace E. Shearrer & Donna Spruijt‐Metz & Jaimie N. Davis & Michael R. Kosorok, 2020. "Estimating individualized treatment regimes from crossover designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 778-788, September.
    11. M. Bierlaire & M. Thémans & N. Zufferey, 2010. "A Heuristic for Nonlinear Global Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 59-70, February.
    12. Gary Kochenberger & Jin-Kao Hao & Fred Glover & Mark Lewis & Zhipeng Lü & Haibo Wang & Yang Wang, 2014. "The unconstrained binary quadratic programming problem: a survey," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 58-81, July.
    13. Ming Huang & Li-Ping Pang & Zun-Quan Xia, 2014. "The space decomposition theory for a class of eigenvalue optimizations," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 423-454, June.
    14. Bai, Jushan & Liao, Yuan, 2016. "Efficient estimation of approximate factor models via penalized maximum likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 1-18.
    15. Manlio Gaudioso & Giovanni Giallombardo & Giovanna Miglionico, 2020. "Essentials of numerical nonsmooth optimization," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 1-47, March.
    16. William Haskell & J. Shanthikumar & Z. Shen, 2013. "Optimization with a class of multivariate integral stochastic order constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 147-162, July.
    17. H. Le Thi & A. Vaz & L. Vicente, 2012. "Optimizing radial basis functions by d.c. programming and its use in direct search for global derivative-free optimization," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(1), pages 190-214, April.
    18. Jean-Paul Penot, 2011. "The directional subdifferential of the difference of two convex functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 505-519, March.
    19. Annabella Astorino & Antonio Fuduli & Manlio Gaudioso, 2012. "Margin maximization in spherical separation," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 301-322, October.
    20. Jeon, Jong-June & Kwon, Sunghoon & Choi, Hosik, 2017. "Homogeneity detection for the high-dimensional generalized linear model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 61-74.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1007_s10878-022-00862-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.