IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v34y2017i2d10.1007_s10878-016-0089-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recoverable robust spanning tree problem under interval uncertainty representations

Author

Listed:
  • Mikita Hradovich

    (Wrocław University of Technology)

  • Adam Kasperski

    (Wrocław University of Technology)

  • Paweł Zieliński

    (Wrocław University of Technology)

Abstract

This paper deals with the recoverable robust spanning tree problem under interval uncertainty representations. A strongly polynomial time, combinatorial algorithm for the recoverable spanning tree problem is first constructed. This problem generalizes the incremental spanning tree problem, previously discussed in literature. The algorithm built is then applied to solve the recoverable robust spanning tree problem, under the traditional interval uncertainty representation, in polynomial time. Moreover, the algorithm allows to obtain several approximation results for the recoverable robust spanning tree problem under the Bertsimas and Sim interval uncertainty representation and the interval uncertainty representation with a budget constraint.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikita Hradovich & Adam Kasperski & Paweł Zieliński, 2017. "Recoverable robust spanning tree problem under interval uncertainty representations," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 554-573, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:34:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-016-0089-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-016-0089-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-016-0089-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-016-0089-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aissi, Hassene & Bazgan, Cristina & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2007. "Approximation of min-max and min-max regret versions of some combinatorial optimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 281-290, June.
    2. Onur Şeref & Ravindra K. Ahuja & James B. Orlin, 2009. "Incremental Network Optimization: Theory and Algorithms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 586-594, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hradovich, Mikita & Kasperski, Adam & Zieliński, Paweł, 2019. "Robust recoverable 0–1 optimization problems under polyhedral uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 136-148.
    2. Goerigk, Marc & Lendl, Stefan & Wulf, Lasse, 2022. "Recoverable robust representatives selection problems with discrete budgeted uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 567-580.
    3. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc & Kasperski, Adam & Zieliński, Paweł, 2018. "On recoverable and two-stage robust selection problems with budgeted uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 423-436.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alireza Amirteimoori & Simin Masrouri, 2021. "DEA-based competition strategy in the presence of undesirable products: An application to paper mills," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(2), pages 5-21.
    2. Hradovich, Mikita & Kasperski, Adam & Zieliński, Paweł, 2019. "Robust recoverable 0–1 optimization problems under polyhedral uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(1), pages 136-148.
    3. Klamroth, Kathrin & Köbis, Elisabeth & Schöbel, Anita & Tammer, Christiane, 2017. "A unified approach to uncertain optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 403-420.
    4. Fragkos, Ioannis & Cordeau, Jean-François & Jans, Raf, 2021. "Decomposition methods for large-scale network expansion problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 60-80.
    5. J. Puerto & A. M. Rodríguez-Chía & A. Tamir, 2009. "Minimax Regret Single-Facility Ordered Median Location Problems on Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 77-87, February.
    6. Baldo, Alessandro & Boffa, Matteo & Cascioli, Lorenzo & Fadda, Edoardo & Lanza, Chiara & Ravera, Arianna, 2023. "The polynomial robust knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1424-1434.
    7. Fabrice Talla Nobibon & Roel Leus, 2014. "Complexity Results and Exact Algorithms for Robust Knapsack Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 533-552, May.
    8. Botte, Marco & Schöbel, Anita, 2019. "Dominance for multi-objective robust optimization concepts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 430-440.
    9. Adam Kasperski & Paweł Zieliński, 2009. "A randomized algorithm for the min-max selecting items problem with uncertain weights," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 221-230, November.
    10. Choi, Byung-Cheon & Chung, Kwanghun, 2016. "Min–max regret version of a scheduling problem with outsourcing decisions under processing time uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 367-375.
    11. Büsing, Christina & Goetzmann, Kai-Simon & Matuschke, Jannik & Stiller, Sebastian, 2017. "Reference points and approximation algorithms in multicriteria discrete optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 829-840.
    12. Roy, Bernard, 2010. "Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: A multi-faceted issue," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 629-638, February.
    13. Bendotti, Pascale & Chrétienne, Philippe & Fouilhoux, Pierre & Pass-Lanneau, Adèle, 2021. "Dominance-based linear formulation for the Anchor-Robust Project Scheduling Problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 22-33.
    14. Kalaı¨, Rim & Lamboray, Claude & Vanderpooten, Daniel, 2012. "Lexicographic α-robustness: An alternative to min–max criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 722-728.
    15. Ximing Wang & Panos M. Pardalos, 2017. "A modified active set algorithm for transportation discrete network design bi-level problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 325-342, January.
    16. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc & Kasperski, Adam & Zieliński, Paweł, 2018. "On recoverable and two-stage robust selection problems with budgeted uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 423-436.
    17. Ali Koç & David P. Morton, 2015. "Prioritization via Stochastic Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 586-603, March.
    18. Chassein, André B. & Goerigk, Marc, 2015. "A new bound for the midpoint solution in minmax regret optimization with an application to the robust shortest path problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 739-747.
    19. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc, 2017. "Minmax regret combinatorial optimization problems with ellipsoidal uncertainty sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 58-69.
    20. Shashi Mittal & Andreas S. Schulz, 2013. "A General Framework for Designing Approximation Schemes for Combinatorial Optimization Problems with Many Objectives Combined into One," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 386-397, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:34:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10878-016-0089-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.