IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jclass/v36y2019i3d10.1007_s00357-018-9299-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization for Parameter Optimization of Support Vector Machine

Author

Listed:
  • Alaa Tharwat

    (Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences)

  • Aboul Ella Hassanien

    (Cairo University
    Scientific Research Group in Egypt (SRGE))

Abstract

Support vector machine (SVM) parameters such as penalty parameter and kernel parameters have a great influence on the complexity and accuracy of SVM model. In this paper, quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) has been employed to optimize the parameters of SVM, so that the classification error can be reduced. To evaluate the proposed model (QPSO-SVM), the experiment adopted seven standard classification datasets which are obtained from UCI machine learning data repository. For verification, the results of the QPSO-SVM algorithm are compared with the standard PSO, and genetic algorithm (GA) which is one of the well-known optimization algorithms. Moreover, the results of QPSO are compared with the grid search, which is a conventional method of searching parameter values. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed model is capable to find the optimal values of the SVM parameters. The results also showed lower classification error rates compared with standard PSO and GA algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaa Tharwat & Aboul Ella Hassanien, 2019. "Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization for Parameter Optimization of Support Vector Machine," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(3), pages 576-598, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:36:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s00357-018-9299-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s00357-018-9299-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00357-018-9299-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00357-018-9299-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asa Ben-Hur & Cheng Soon Ong & Sören Sonnenburg & Bernhard Schölkopf & Gunnar Rätsch, 2008. "Support Vector Machines and Kernels for Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(10), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Gaige Wang & Lihong Guo, 2013. "A Novel Hybrid Bat Algorithm with Harmony Search for Global Numerical Optimization," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiaozhen Guo & Huanhuan Wu & Huiyi Jin & Guang Yang & Xiaoxu Wu, 2022. "Remote Sensing Inversion of Suspended Matter Concentration Using a Neural Network Model Optimized by the Partial Least Squares and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Qinghe Zhao & Zifang Zhang & Yuchen Huang & Junlong Fang, 2022. "TPE-RBF-SVM Model for Soybean Categories Recognition in Selected Hyperspectral Bands Based on Extreme Gradient Boosting Feature Importance Values," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emily S W Wong & Margaret C Hardy & David Wood & Timothy Bailey & Glenn F King, 2013. "SVM-Based Prediction of Propeptide Cleavage Sites in Spider Toxins Identifies Toxin Innovation in an Australian Tarantula," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Lior Shamir & John D Delaney & Nikita Orlov & D Mark Eckley & Ilya G Goldberg, 2010. "Pattern Recognition Software and Techniques for Biological Image Analysis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Kay H Brodersen & Thomas M Schofield & Alexander P Leff & Cheng Soon Ong & Ekaterina I Lomakina & Joachim M Buhmann & Klaas E Stephan, 2011. "Generative Embedding for Model-Based Classification of fMRI Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Shweta Bhandare & Debra S Goldberg & Robin Dowell, 2017. "Discriminating between HuR and TTP binding sites using the k-spectrum kernel method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Gülnur Yildizdan & Ömer Kaan Baykan, 2020. "A New Hybrid BA_ABC Algorithm for Global Optimization Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-36, October.
    6. Cheng-Long Wei & Gai-Ge Wang, 2020. "Hybrid Annealing Krill Herd and Quantum-Behaved Particle Swarm Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Wei Shui & Yiyi Zhang & Xinggui Wang & Yuanmeng Liu & Qianfeng Wang & Fei Duan & Chaowei Wu & Wanyu Shui, 2022. "Does Tibetan Household Livelihood Capital Enhance Tourism Participation Sustainability? Evidence from China’s Jiaju Tibetan Village," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Marina M -C Vidovic & Nico Görnitz & Klaus-Robert Müller & Gunnar Rätsch & Marius Kloft, 2015. "SVM2Motif—Reconstructing Overlapping DNA Sequence Motifs by Mimicking an SVM Predictor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    9. Emili Balaguer-Ballester & Christopher C Lapish & Jeremy K Seamans & Daniel Durstewitz, 2011. "Attracting Dynamics of Frontal Cortex Ensembles during Memory-Guided Decision-Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    10. A Ivanenko & P Watkins & M A J van Gerven & K Hammerschmidt & B Englitz, 2020. "Classifying sex and strain from mouse ultrasonic vocalizations using deep learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-27, June.
    11. Yue Deng & Yanyu Zhao & Yebin Liu & Qionghai Dai, 2013. "Differences Help Recognition: A Probabilistic Interpretation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-10, June.
    12. Charlotte Soneson & Sarah Gerster & Mauro Delorenzi, 2014. "Batch Effect Confounding Leads to Strong Bias in Performance Estimates Obtained by Cross-Validation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-13, June.
    13. Igor O Korolev & Laura L Symonds & Andrea C Bozoki & Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, 2016. "Predicting Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Dementia Using Clinical, MRI, and Plasma Biomarkers via Probabilistic Pattern Classification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Stephen J Gilmore, 2018. "Automated decision support in melanocytic lesion management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    15. Juan A G Ranea & Ian Morilla & Jon G Lees & Adam J Reid & Corin Yeats & Andrew B Clegg & Francisca Sanchez-Jimenez & Christine Orengo, 2010. "Finding the “Dark Matter” in Human and Yeast Protein Network Prediction and Modelling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    16. Kundan Kumar & Rajeev Arya, 2023. "A hybrid approach for cluster head determination of unmanned aerial vehicle in flying ad-hoc networks," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(3), pages 759-773, July.
    17. S. Camelo & M. González-Lima & A. Quiroz, 2015. "Nearest neighbors methods for support vector machines," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 85-101, December.
    18. Takaya Saito & Marc Rehmsmeier, 2015. "The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jclass:v:36:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s00357-018-9299-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.