IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infsem/v14y2016i4d10.1007_s10257-014-0250-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding process change management in electronic health record implementations

Author

Listed:
  • Amit V. Deokar

    (Pennsylvania State University)

  • Surendra Sarnikar

    (Dakota State University)

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR) implementations involve changes to core organizational processes, and management of these changes is critical to the success of such implementation efforts. This research describes how process change issues relate to implementation of large IT projects in healthcare settings. Specifically, we draw on extant literature and conduct directed content analysis on project reports by past HIMSS Davies Award recipients to present process change related best practices occurring in EHR implementations. The results from this study can influence implementation strategies for future health information technology implementation efforts in the healthcare sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Amit V. Deokar & Surendra Sarnikar, 2016. "Understanding process change management in electronic health record implementations," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 733-766, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:14:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10257-014-0250-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10257-014-0250-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-014-0250-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10257-014-0250-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blake, R. Todd & Massey, Anne P. & Bala, Hillol & Cummings, Jeff & Zotos, Angela, 2010. "Driving health IT implementation success: Insights from The Christ Hospital," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 131-138, March.
    2. Cynthia Mathis Beath & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1994. "The Contradictory Structure of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-User Relationship in Information Engineering," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 350-377, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maha Syed Ibrahim & Aamer Hanif & Faheem Qaisar Jamal & Ali Ahsan, 2019. "Towards successful business process improvement – An extension of change acceleration process model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Thai-Minh Truong & Lam-Son Lê & Elda Paja & Paolo Giorgini, 2021. "A data-driven, goal-oriented framework for process-focused enterprise re-engineering," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 683-747, June.
    3. Elina Laukka & Moona Huhtakangas & Tarja Heponiemi & Outi Kanste, 2020. "Identifying the Roles of Healthcare Leaders in HIT Implementation: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blackburn, Nivea & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse & Hooper, Val, 2014. "A dialogical framing of AIS–SEA design," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 83-101.
    2. Shahla Ghobadi & John Campbell & Stewart Clegg, 2017. "Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 397-409, April.
    3. Mähring, Magnus, 2002. "IT Project Governance: A Process-Oriented Study of Organizational Control and Executive Involvement," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration 2002:15, Stockholm School of Economics.
    4. Wanda J. Orlikowski & C. Suzanne Iacono, 2001. "Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 121-134, June.
    5. Müller, Sune Dueholm & Mathiassen, Lars & Balshøj, Hans Henrik, 2008. "Organizational Change Perspectives on Software Process Improvement," Informatics Research Group Working Papers I-2008-02, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    6. Klein, Jonathan H., 2009. "Ackoff's Fables revisited: stories to inform operational research practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 615-623, June.
    7. D.M. Eriksson, 1998. "Managing Problems of Postmodernity: Some Heuristics for Evaluation of Systems Approaches," Working Papers ir98060, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    8. Likoebe M. Maruping & Viswanath Venkatesh & Ritu Agarwal, 2009. "A Control Theory Perspective on Agile Methodology Use and Changing User Requirements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 377-399, September.
    9. Shahla Ghobadi & John Campbell & Stewart Clegg, 0. "Pair programming teams and high-quality knowledge sharing: A comparative study of coopetitive reward structures," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    10. Avgerou, Chrisanthi & McGrath, Kathy, 2007. "Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-technical change," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 2353, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Mauro, Marianna & Cardamone, Emma & Cavallaro, Giusy & Minvielle, Etienne & Rania, Francesco & Sicotte, Claude & Trotta, Annarita, 2014. "Teaching hospital performance: Towards a community of shared values?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 107-112.
    12. Goles, Tim & Hirschheim, Rudy, 2000. "The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead...long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 249-268, June.
    13. Angel L. Meroño-Cerdan & Carolina López-Nicolas, 2013. "Understanding the drivers of organizational innovations," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(13-14), pages 1312-1325, October.
    14. Russell L. Purvis & V. Sambamurthy & Robert W. Zmud, 2001. "The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 117-135, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infsem:v:14:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s10257-014-0250-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.